Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / Country Specific / Australian Group / September 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

It lives!!!!!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fraser Johnston - 19 Sep 2008 12:34 GMT
My K7 GSX-R 1000 I picked up at the auctions finally lives.  After iks
post about security systems and new Suzukis I jumped on Perth Street
Bikes to see if I could find the key for it.  As luck would have it the
previous owner contacted me and he still had both keys.  Saving me $2300
for a new ecu and lockset. : )  I was a happy camper.  Today my radiator
arrived from the states and I installed it.  After addding coolant it
fired up first push of the button and purred.  So now all I need is a
headlight, my plastics from Hong Kong and maybe a rear subframe and it
should be on the road.  Can't wait.  I reckon it is about 4 weeks away.
 After a country ride on the Triumph this week I've decided to get rid
of it and keep the gixxer.  It just fits me better and the Trumpy kills
my wrists after 50kms.

Fraser
Biggus :)~ - 19 Sep 2008 12:53 GMT
>  It just fits me better and the Trumpy kills my wrists after 50kms.
LOL! Wait till u see what the GSXR does to ya wrists then! Bloke I
raced with has one, he only does short shots as it f.cks his wrists,
the leaning angle on them.
Fraser Johnston - 20 Sep 2008 09:40 GMT
>>  It just fits me better and the Trumpy kills my wrists after 50kms.
> LOL! Wait till u see what the GSXR does to ya wrists then! Bloke I
> raced with has one, he only does short shots as it f.cks his wrists,
> the leaning angle on them.

Way better fit for my body type on the gixxer.  Horses for courses and
all that.  The gixxer is a lot lower as well.  You really perch on the
Daytona.  Plus I miss the mid range stonk of the Blackbird and the
Suzuki should have that in spades.

Fraser
Johno - 19 Sep 2008 13:03 GMT
>My K7 GSX-R 1000 I picked up at the auctions finally lives.  After iks
>post about security systems and new Suzukis I jumped on Perth Street
>Bikes to see if I could find the key for it.  

> As luck would have it the previous owner contacted me and he still had both keys.  Saving me $2300
>for a new ecu and lockset. : )

Is that suzuki's quote?

> I was a happy camper.  Today my radiator arrived from the states and I installed it.

A lot cheaper than a aussie dealer?

>and maybe a rear subframe and it should be on the road.

Subframe? you know Maggie then?

Can't wait.  I reckon it is about 4 weeks away.
>  After a country ride on the Triumph this week I've decided to get rid
>of it and keep the gixxer.  It just fits me better and the Trumpy kills
>my wrists after 50kms.

What Trumpy?

Johno

Beer?
Knobdoodle - 19 Sep 2008 15:12 GMT
> What Trumpy?

Fraser's a 675 Date-owner.
Signature

Clem

CrazyCam - 20 Sep 2008 09:47 GMT
>> What Trumpy?
>>
> Fraser's a 675 Date-owner.

Owning a Daytona 675 is OK, but riding one takes a committed masochist.

    regards,
        CrazyCam
atec77 - 20 Sep 2008 09:51 GMT
>>> What Trumpy?
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     regards,
>         CrazyCam
Are you under 6' ?
CrazyCam - 20 Sep 2008 10:00 GMT
>>>> What Trumpy?
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>>         CrazyCam
> Are you under 6' ?

Well under.   I used to be 5'10" before the operation.

    regards,
        CrazyCam
atec77 - 20 Sep 2008 11:53 GMT
>>>>> What Trumpy?
>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>     regards,
>         CrazyCam
I have ridden one for some distance but I have long limbs and stall much
taller than you , perhaps if you use top gear and stay moving it will
ease the wrists ?
CrazyCam - 21 Sep 2008 00:52 GMT
>>>>>> What Trumpy?
>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> taller than you , perhaps if you use top gear and stay moving it will
> ease the wrists ?

Mate, I can't even sit on a Daytona in the showroom, which is why I have
the Street Triple.

I can do the curled up leg bit, since I've got the Daytona pegs fitted,
but having the hands that far forward and down is way too much for me.

I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
reckon that doing a 1,000kms in a day would require serious amounts of
masochism.

I can imagine, from how the Striple goes, that the Daytona is a really
nice sports bike, but it'll never, sensibly, be called a sports/tourer. :-)

    regards,
        CrazyCam
Fraser Johnston - 21 Sep 2008 01:27 GMT
>>>>>>> What Trumpy?
>>>>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> I can imagine, from how the Striple goes, that the Daytona is a really
> nice sports bike, but it'll never, sensibly, be called a sports/tourer. :-)

I concurr.  At 5'10" as well the riding position is truly awful for me.
That is the main reason I am getting rid of it.

Fraser
Toosmoky - 21 Sep 2008 05:18 GMT
> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
> reckon that doing a 1,000kms in a day would require serious amounts of
> masochism.

If your weight is on your wrists, then you're doing it wrong.

Signature

Toosmoky
Work to ride, Ride to Work...
http://users.tpg.com.au/smokey61

CrazyCam - 21 Sep 2008 06:06 GMT
>> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
>> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
>> reckon that doing a 1,000kms in a day would require serious amounts of
>> masochism.
>
> If your weight is on your wrists, then you're doing it wrong.

Thanks mate, but I have a wife to tell me that sort of stuff.

    regards,
        CrazyCam
Johno - 21 Sep 2008 11:04 GMT
>>> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
>>> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>    regards,
>        CrazyCam

And they seem to have the knack to do it so well!

Johno <under the thumb>

Stout mate? tis Southwark
CrazyCam - 21 Sep 2008 23:19 GMT
<snip>

> Stout mate? tis Southwark

Cheers, mate.

BTW I had a bottle of the Coopers "hi-octane" ale yesterday (7.5%), and
it was very nice.

    regards,
        CrazyCam
BT Humble - 22 Sep 2008 04:19 GMT
> >> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
> >> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Thanks mate, but I have a wife to tell me that sort of stuff.

My lovely wife's crook back means that she's not getting much use out
of her Hyosung GT650R.  After looking at the website pix of the GT650R
and GT650S, it seems to me that replacing the clip-ons with riser bars
should be quite doable:

http://www.hyosung.com.au/Products/GT650R.html
http://www.hyosung.com.au/Products/GT650S-Tourer.html

Swapping the screen, handlebar brackets, upper brake line, clutch &
throttle cables should do the trick.  Now I just have to get her to
test ride a GT650S before I start spending money...

BTH
Fraser Johnston - 22 Sep 2008 01:22 GMT
>> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
>> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
>> reckon that doing a 1,000kms in a day would require serious amounts of
>> masochism.
>
> If your weight is on your wrists, then you're doing it wrong.

Tell us how to do it right.

Fraser
Zebee Johnstone - 22 Sep 2008 03:39 GMT
In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:22:44 +0800

>>> I can understand that most folk riding them are younger, fitter and
>>> bendier than I am...... not a big ask! .....but even at that, I still
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Tell us how to do it right.

THe spine is a rope.  to keep the shoulders up you have to brace the
spine to make it a braced rope.

If you just tense the back muscles then it might pull the shoulders
back but it will pull the back ino a curve and most of the body will
still be forward.

So you engage the core muscles - abs and obliques and corset - to
stabilise the lower back in neutral spine position so it's not
overarched and the spinal erector muscles have something to pull
against to keep the upper body where it's supposed to be.

You then brace the hips in neutral position by using the lower abs and
hip flexors and upper quads so the legs help to position and stabilise
the torso.

The end result is holding the upper body up the way you are supposed
to rather than leaning on your hands and putting silly steering inputs
in.

(And the ability to hold the body straight and where you want it without
putting too much weight on your hands while bracing the hips and steering
straight has other uses....)

Zebee
Kevin Gleeson - 22 Sep 2008 07:47 GMT
>In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 08:22:44 +0800
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
>Zebee

Or you just ride ridiculously fast so air pressure takes the weight
off your wrists. Works for me.
bikerbetty - 22 Sep 2008 08:02 GMT
>>THe spine is a rope.  to keep the shoulders up you have to brace the
>>spine to make it a braced rope.
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> Or you just ride ridiculously fast so air pressure takes the weight
> off your wrists. Works for me.

Well.... when you have a bike, anyway..... <evil wicked grin>

betty, running away
PS does that really work? And does it help with the shoulder twinges, or are
they just a consequence of me being old and arthritic? Wrists be fine, lower
back be fine.... shoulders seem stuffed...
JL - 22 Sep 2008 08:24 GMT
> "Kevin Gleeson" <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au> wrote in message

> > Or you just ride ridiculously fast so air pressure takes the weight
> > off your wrists. Works for me.

> PS does that really work?

Yes, and on a naked bike it requires lower speeds than a faired bike

JL
Andrew McKenna - 22 Sep 2008 08:38 GMT
>> "Kevin Gleeson" <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> JL

In fact, on a sufficiently powerful naked bike, it is possible to
achieve a complete sense of weightlessness. [1]

Signature

Regards

Andrew

[1] Sometimes followed by a complete sense of death.

sharkey - 23 Sep 2008 11:43 GMT
> In fact, on a sufficiently powerful naked bike, it is possible to
> achieve a complete sense of weightlessness. [1]

Oh yeah, I remember that ... shortly followed by a complete sense of
ambulancedness.

-----sharks
IK Laboratories - 23 Sep 2008 12:23 GMT
>> In fact, on a sufficiently powerful naked bike, it is possible to
>> achieve a complete sense of weightlessness. [1]
>
> Oh yeah, I remember that ... shortly followed by a complete sense of
> ambulancedness.

That's only a transient state; once the morphine takes effect, the sense
 of weightlessness returns.
Kevin Gleeson - 22 Sep 2008 08:38 GMT
>>>THe spine is a rope.  to keep the shoulders up you have to brace the
>>>spine to make it a braced rope.
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
>Well.... when you have a bike, anyway..... <evil wicked grin>

I'm coming to Canberra to steal an SV and turbocharge it.

>betty, running away
>PS does that really work? And does it help with the shoulder twinges, or are
>they just a consequence of me being old and arthritic? Wrists be fine, lower
>back be fine.... shoulders seem stuffed...

Oh yes, it works. And it sorta goes in reverse at certain speeds that
we won't talk about here.
bikerbetty - 22 Sep 2008 08:43 GMT
>>>>THe spine is a rope.  to keep the shoulders up you have to brace the
>>>>spine to make it a braced rope.
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
>
> I'm coming to Canberra to steal an SV and turbocharge it.

HA! (gee, that was a snappy comeback, hey?)

>>betty, running away
>>PS does that really work? And does it help with the shoulder twinges, or
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Oh yes, it works. And it sorta goes in reverse at certain speeds that
> we won't talk about here.

LOL, touche! <muttering>
JL - 22 Sep 2008 09:43 GMT
On Sep 22, 5:38 pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:02:19 +1000, "bikerbetty"
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Oh yes, it works. And it sorta goes in reverse at certain speeds that
> we won't talk about here.

Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)
- I can tell you that on a X Raptor the relevant speeds are ~130 and
about 220-230 (tucked in in the latter case - much lower I would
expect if you were silly enough to sit up)

JL
bikerbetty - 22 Sep 2008 10:33 GMT
On Sep 22, 5:38 pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:02:19 +1000, "bikerbetty"
>
[quoted text clipped - 44 lines]
> Oh yes, it works. And it sorta goes in reverse at certain speeds that
> we won't talk about here.

Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)
- I can tell you that on a X Raptor the relevant speeds are ~130 and
about 220-230 (tucked in in the latter case - much lower I would
expect if you were silly enough to sit up)

JL

So... at those "other speeds" which shall never be mentioned, is the wrist
pain from leaning on the wrists, or desperately hanging on and hoping
they're not snapped off by your own body weight as it tries to fly off the
back of the bike???

betty, not ever likely to
find out for herself
jl - 22 Sep 2008 12:02 GMT
> On Sep 22, 5:38 pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> they're not snapped off by your own body weight as it tries to fly off the
> back of the bike???

Well both and neither ! :-)

Below 130 if you're not following Zebee's advice then yes you can get
wrist pain (although the riding position on the X Rap isn't at all hard
on the wrists anyway - well at the moment - that may change with the
rearsets).

Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even tucked
down it's getting scarily strong

> betty, not ever likely to
> find out for herself

JL
1 Which is pretty much flat stick with the stock gearing, and with the
new higher ratios the straight at Eastern Creek isn't long enough to
find out about any faster even assuming it's able to pull above that (it
now has more rpm left but I suspect would take a lot of runway to go
above it)
Yeebok - 22 Sep 2008 13:23 GMT
>> On Sep 22, 5:38 pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> now has more rpm left but I suspect would take a lot of runway to go
> above it)
Makes my 148 flat chat seem paltry ! :)
jl - 22 Sep 2008 13:47 GMT
>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even tucked
>> down it's getting scarily strong

>> 1 Which is pretty much flat stick with the stock gearing, and with the
>> new higher ratios the straight at Eastern Creek isn't long enough to
>> find out about any faster even assuming it's able to pull above that
>> (it now has more rpm left but I suspect would take a lot of runway to
>> go above it)
> Makes my 148 flat chat seem paltry ! :)

148 flat is a bit ordinary for a modern 250. Ally's 10yr old GPX with
lots of Km's on it was good for 160+

Are you scrunching yourself down(1) and knees in to get out of the wind
? It's worth at least 10K on a low HP bike ! Sometimes more.

JL

1 known as "tucking in" nothing to do with putting the kids to bed
Fraser Johnston - 23 Sep 2008 02:35 GMT
>>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even
>>> tucked down it's getting scarily strong
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> 1 known as "tucking in" nothing to do with putting the kids to bed

My VTR was only good for about 150 flat out with me on it.

Fraser
JL - 23 Sep 2008 03:34 GMT
On Sep 23, 11:35 am, Fraser Johnston <fra...@cjmanagement.com.au>
wrote:
> >>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even
> >>> tucked down it's getting scarily strong
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> My VTR was only good for about 150 flat out with me on it.

Time to lose weight ?

JL
Fraser Johnston - 23 Sep 2008 04:02 GMT
> On Sep 23, 11:35 am, Fraser Johnston <fra...@cjmanagement.com.au>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> JL

No kidding.  I'm 95kg at the moment.  I should be 80.  I need to get
back on the bike I have to pedal.  Or buy a Harley and push it everywhere.

Fraser
Johno - 23 Sep 2008 04:29 GMT
>> On Sep 23, 11:35 am, Fraser Johnston <fra...@cjmanagement.com.au>
>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
>Fraser

No ute?

Johno
Fraser Johnston - 23 Sep 2008 05:02 GMT
>>> On Sep 23, 11:35 am, Fraser Johnston <fra...@cjmanagement.com.au>
>>> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
>
> Johno

Nope.  But I do have a bike trailer coming.

Fraser
Yeebok - 23 Sep 2008 07:24 GMT
>>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even
>>> tucked down it's getting scarily strong
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> 1 known as "tucking in" nothing to do with putting the kids to bed

To be honest I can't recall, *now* when I go fast I definitely tuck
myself in but way back then (pre-stack) I was a bit more gung ho I
guess. I presume 28.5 is "low HP" :) I'm 65Kg and about 170cm tall.
jl - 23 Sep 2008 23:01 GMT
>>>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even
>>>> tucked down it's getting scarily strong
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>> Are you scrunching yourself down(1) and knees in to get out of the
>> wind ? It's worth at least 10K on a low HP bike ! Sometimes more.

>> 1 known as "tucking in" nothing to do with putting the kids to bed
>
> To be honest I can't recall, *now* when I go fast I definitely tuck
> myself in but way back then (pre-stack) I was a bit more gung ho I
> guess. I presume 28.5 is "low HP" :)

By modern standards yes. In the 50's that would be a good middleweight :-)

> I'm 65Kg and about 170cm tall.

Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I asked
whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about having
gotten porky :-)

Wind drag is a big issue for low HP bikes - after about 120Km/hr or so
you lose a lot of your top speed to drag - hence a even a little
flyscreen will make more difference on a 125 or 250 than it does for a
larger bike.

Put it this way, on a mid 80's 750 cruiser (ie modest HP - 50 or so HP I
guess and no fairing). 10Kg and tucking in made 40Km/hr difference to
the top speed - I could get 210 (flat stick with a tailwind and a long
road) with my face on the tank and feet on the rear pegs. My father
weighed 10Kg more and would only hunch down - he could only get 170

JL
Nigel Allen - 23 Sep 2008 23:10 GMT
>>>>> Above 220, yes you're hanging on for dear life - at 250(1) even
>>>>> tucked down it's getting scarily strong
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> Wind drag is a big issue for low HP bikes - after about 120Km/hr or so
> you lose a lot of your top speed to drag

Try wearing a smaller frock with less frills.

(I used to go drag racing but could never get enough traction in those
high heels).

N/
jl - 23 Sep 2008 23:36 GMT
>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Try wearing a smaller frock with less frills.

??? I'm sure there's a point to your aspersions but it's lost on me - in
what particular way am I being "girly"

JL
CrazyCam - 23 Sep 2008 23:55 GMT
>>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
>>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ??? I'm sure there's a point to your aspersions but it's lost on me - in
> what particular way am I being "girly"

Well, you are admitting to riding "low HP bikes", and everybody knows
what happens to a bloke who does that. ;-)

    regards,
        CrazyCam
JL - 24 Sep 2008 01:47 GMT
> >>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
> >>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Well, you are admitting to riding "low HP bikes", and everybody knows
> what happens to a bloke who does that. ;-)

<Grin> Indeed.

JL
SteveB - 24 Sep 2008 04:59 GMT
> >>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
> >>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>         regards,
>                 CrazyCam

Calling BTH, Calling BTH

Spirrited defence required here!

Calling BTH

SteveB
BT Humble - 25 Sep 2008 23:40 GMT
> > Well, you are admitting to riding "low HP bikes", and everybody knows
> > what happens to a bloke who does that. ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> SteveB

Oh no, he's quite right.  If I didn't have a wife to help me look I'd
*never* be able to find my penis!

BTH
Goaty - 26 Sep 2008 02:32 GMT
>>>Well, you are admitting to riding "low HP bikes", and everybody knows
>>>what happens to a bloke who does that. ;-)
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Oh no, he's quite right.  If I didn't have a wife to help me look I'd
> *never* be able to find my penis!

Don't know about that, I'm sure you'd manage. It's just that it's much
more fun with the domestic assistance ...

Cheers
Goaty
Signature

 _--_|\                   John Lamp - in beautiful downtown Highton
/      \   IRC:Goaty@aus.moto DoD#:1906 Ulysses#:10185 Vulcan Nomad
\_.--._/                                        Phone: 0409 512 254
      v                mailto:John.Lamp@gmail.com Fax: 03 5227 2151

Hear no Evo, See no Evo, Fear no Evo

Yeebok - 24 Sep 2008 07:58 GMT
>>>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
>>>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums
>>>> about having gotten porky :-)

This bit ->
>>>> Wind drag is a big issue for low HP bikes - after about 120Km/hr or
>>>> so you lose a lot of your top speed to drag
<-
>>> Try wearing a smaller frock with less frills.
Got that response above, logical to me. Then again I've had about 4
hours sleep in the last 2 days so ..

>> ??? I'm sure there's a point to your aspersions but it's lost on me -
>> in what particular way am I being "girly"
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>     regards,
>         CrazyCam
I get the feeling the word "Drag" frequently in the sentence (as
highlighted) and the references to frocks go quite well together.
Nigel Allen - 24 Sep 2008 00:01 GMT
>>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
>>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ??? I'm sure there's a point to your aspersions but it's lost on me - in
> what particular way am I being "girly"

Drag? Frock? Heels?

Another espresso sir?
JL - 24 Sep 2008 01:46 GMT
On Sep 24, 9:01 am, Nigel Allen <"dna at edrs dot remove this com dot
au"> wrote:

> >>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I
> >>> asked whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Drag? Frock? Heels?

Far too subtle for the likes of me. You were confusing me with the
witty people on this forum. I'm as subtle as a brick through a window
(and usually about as pleasant :-).

> Another espresso sir?

Certainly, make it a doppio ristretto please

JL
Nigel Allen - 24 Sep 2008 02:32 GMT
> On Sep 24, 9:01 am, Nigel Allen <"dna at edrs dot remove this com dot
> au"> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Certainly, make it a doppio ristretto please

Ahhh.....

A man after my own blood pressure :)

N/
Knobdoodle - 24 Sep 2008 12:33 GMT
>>> Yes I recalled you being relatively small and light, that's why I asked
>>> whether you'd tucked in (as opposed to casting nasturiums about having
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> ??? I'm sure there's a point to your aspersions but it's lost on me - in
> what particular way am I being "girly"

I just saw it as a transparent device to introduce the "drag" pun.
I respect that sorta' behaviour!
Signature

Clem

BT Humble - 23 Sep 2008 23:07 GMT
> To be honest I can't recall, *now* when I go fast I definitely tuck
> myself in but way back then (pre-stack) I was a bit more gung ho I
> guess. I presume 28.5 is "low HP" :) I'm 65Kg and about 170cm tall.

You need to find some of those kilos that Fraser is trying to lose.

BTH
Fraser Johnston - 24 Sep 2008 04:26 GMT
>> To be honest I can't recall, *now* when I go fast I definitely tuck
>> myself in but way back then (pre-stack) I was a bit more gung ho I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> BTH

He's welcome to them. : )

Fraser
Yeebok - 24 Sep 2008 08:00 GMT
>>> To be honest I can't recall, *now* when I go fast I definitely tuck
>>> myself in but way back then (pre-stack) I was a bit more gung ho I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Fraser
Send it over, been trying to put weight on for years.

There should be room in George's shed for it if you don't want to post it.
Zebee Johnstone - 23 Sep 2008 07:38 GMT
In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:47:53 +1000

> 148 flat is a bit ordinary for a modern 250. Ally's 10yr old GPX with
> lots of Km's on it was good for 160+

Ahh memories.

Crawling behind the clocks on the Infamous MZ and burying the tacho in
the red, watching the speedo needle hit the stop....

Downhill.

Was probably about 140kmh.

Zebee
atec77 - 23 Sep 2008 08:08 GMT
> In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:47:53 +1000
>> 148 flat is a bit ordinary for a modern 250. Ally's 10yr old GPX with
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Zebee

I well remember traveling into Wellington from Lower Hutt years ago on
the Rg , 4 leading shoe after market brake and a "race" port jobby with
a pair of chambers  and drop bars with the tacho into the red and "just"
making the 100mph... well thrashed and great fun
JL - 23 Sep 2008 13:33 GMT
> In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:47:53 +1000
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Was probably about 140kmh.

Well it's quicker than a Bantam then !

Slow 250 2 strokes from the 50's & 60's - beats walking ! :-)

Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?

JL
(I don't care when your MZ was actually made it's still a 50's
design !)
Knobdoodle - 23 Sep 2008 14:45 GMT
Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"made the MZ a lot quicker "...  does not compute. [1]
Why would you own an MZ if you wanted to travel quicker?
Is there a scenerio where people who have the disposable-income to buy and
fit go-faster bits but are confined to riding MZs?
(since the Berlin Wall came down?)
Signature

Clem
[1] It's about the same as BMW contesting the SBK Superbikes!!

jl - 23 Sep 2008 23:03 GMT
> Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
> get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Is there a scenerio where people who have the disposable-income to buy and
> fit go-faster bits but are confined to riding MZs?

Err yes it's the 70s or 80's and you live on the wrong side of the
Berlin wall, or you're a nutter in Oz :-)

> (since the Berlin Wall came down?)

Ahh see now there's the assumption - I'm talking about history lessons
back in the era when Zebee owned the bike

JL
(although you'd still be better off with the Jap smokers of the time)
Zebee Johnstone - 24 Sep 2008 01:36 GMT
In aus.motorcycles on Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:03:59 +1000
> Ahh see now there's the assumption - I'm talking about history lessons
> back in the era when Zebee owned the bike

It was an 84 but I had it in the early 90s.

Excellent commuter because of the zero maintenance including enclosed
chain, and it took me to Melbourne, Sydney, Lismore, Brisbane.  

Indeed regular trips to a contracting job at Lismore from Adelaide
where what finally made me sell it - 1000km days at redline
slipstreaming trucks (or not if it was wet...) were getting tiring.

Zebee
Nigel Allen - 23 Sep 2008 23:24 GMT
> Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
> get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> fit go-faster bits but are confined to riding MZs?
> (since the Berlin Wall came down?)

I first learned on a "real" MZ 250 - The Trophy (although god only knows
why it was called that. It looked more like my mother's bloody hoover.

I just found one: http://classic-motorcycles.com/mz_trophy.html

Classic!

N/
jl - 23 Sep 2008 23:37 GMT
>> Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
>> get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> I just found one: http://classic-motorcycles.com/mz_trophy.html

Maybe there was a trophy for the poorest taste in motorcycle design ?

> Classic!

Naw that's the GPZ900

JL
Yeebok - 24 Sep 2008 08:02 GMT
>> Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
>> get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> N/
And here I was thinking my ex wife was the ugliest thing I've seen..

I am now revising that opinion.
bill_h - 24 Sep 2008 03:54 GMT
>Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
>get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>"made the MZ a lot quicker "...  does not compute. [1]
>Why would you own an MZ if you wanted to travel quicker?

dunno, there's some strange folk out there...

>Is there a scenerio where people who have the disposable-income to buy and
>fit go-faster bits but are confined to riding MZs?
>(since the Berlin Wall came down?)

http://www.bmzrc.net/

Seems to be the pommie version of bucket racing.

Bill

(proud past owner of an ETZ 250)
Zebee Johnstone - 23 Sep 2008 21:29 GMT
In aus.motorcycles on Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:33:06 -0700 (PDT)

> Well it's quicker than a Bantam then !

well a Bantam was at best a 175, so you'd hope so!

> Slow 250 2 strokes from the 50's & 60's - beats walking ! :-)

125, 150 or 175.  Still slow though.  Good little commuters in heavy
traffic though and the one I commuted on for a bit would do the 80kmh
on Main North Road without difficulty.  Rindinging frantically.

> Wasn't there an aftermarket expansion pipe and CV carb kit you could
> get that made the MZ a lot quicker ?

THey race them in pommy land (or did a few years ago) so yes.  You
could get them ported and polished and a chamber and bigger carbs.
And put the 300cc barrels on too.

> JL
> (I don't care when your MZ was actually made it's still a 50's
> design !)

Damn right.  Piston port 2 stroke, simplest motor there is.

MZs are tough little buggers designed to be maintained by the village
blacksmith and to be willed to your children.  A solid reliable
beastie that would run at redline all day and the only maintenance
needed was to give it a new sparkplug for Christmas and promise it
you'd do the points.

Zebee
JL - 24 Sep 2008 04:11 GMT
> MZs are tough little buggers designed to be maintained by the village
> blacksmith and to be willed to your children.

Who will look at it askance, and then put it with Granny's china
figurines in a back shed for a decade until the guilt about throwing
it out recedes enough to give it St Vinnies

JL
theo - 24 Sep 2008 04:26 GMT
> > MZs are tough little buggers designed to be maintained by the village
> > blacksmith and to be willed to your children.
>
> Who will look at it askance, and then put it with Granny's china
> figurines in a back shed for a decade until the guilt about throwing
> it out recedes enough to give it St Vinnies

There was a glass jug in the news the other day that someone bought
for 25 quid at a 'getting rid of granny's junk' sale. it was then
thougth to be a 18th century French thing and was resold for 200,000.
turns out the astute person who bought it knew it was from the tenth
century, there may be six more like it and they are hoping to get 2
million or more at auction.

Not likely for a 250MZ though.

Theo
JL - 24 Sep 2008 05:12 GMT
> > > MZs are tough little buggers designed to be maintained by the village
> > > blacksmith and to be willed to your children.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Not likely for a 250MZ though.

Nor likely that the owner of an MZ is likely to be hoarding 10th C
glass jugs either. More likely a collection of those jam jars that
became drinking glasses once you'd emptied them.

Or to put it another way the adjective "parsimonious" is more likely
than "aesthete"...

JL
Yeebok - 24 Sep 2008 08:03 GMT
>>>> MZs are tough little buggers designed to be maintained by the village
>>>> blacksmith and to be willed to your children.
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
>
> JL
LOL :)
Kevin Gleeson - 22 Sep 2008 22:06 GMT
>On Sep 22, 5:38 pm, Kevin Gleeson <kevinglee...@imagine-it.com.au>
>wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 62 lines]
>betty, not ever likely to
>find out for herself

At silly speeds you tend to have to hang on like hell and it becomes
quite physical. I did a run from Horsham to Adelaide in 1984 and was
cruising at a pretty constant 240km/h (apart from towns) and that
seemed to be OK on wrists. Faster than that and you started to have to
wrestle the bike and pull yourself back onto it.
Nev.. - 24 Sep 2008 10:11 GMT
> Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
> Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)

I'm not sure the police could actually mount any sort of case based
merely on heresay they read on usenet and no evidence.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
jl - 24 Sep 2008 12:01 GMT
>> Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
>> Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)
>
> I'm not sure the police could actually mount any sort of case based
> merely on heresay they read on usenet and no evidence.

As a deeply cynical and mistrusting soul I'm not about to allow the
opportunity to arise...

JL
CrazyCam - 24 Sep 2008 21:27 GMT
>> Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
>> Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)
>
> I'm not sure the police could actually mount any sort of case based
> merely on heresay they read on usenet and no evidence.

Well, maybe not for speeding.

    regards,
        CrazyCam
theo - 24 Sep 2008 23:43 GMT
> > I'm not sure the police could actually mount any sort of case based
> > merely on heresay they read on usenet and no evidence.

> Well, maybe not for speeding.

The Fed police can pick you up for suspicion of anything at all, and
hold you for 4 days without notifying any of your family. After they
release you uncharged, and you tell your wife where you've been, they
can jail you.

Theo
Psst, I've got a dozen phone SIM cards in my desk.
JL - 25 Sep 2008 00:26 GMT
> > > I'm not sure the police could actually mount any sort of case based
> > > merely on heresay they read on usenet and no evidence.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> release you uncharged, and you tell your wife where you've been, they
> can jail you.

Indeed, it's supposedly anti-terrorist, but they don't actually have
to prove you have contact with or links to terrorists, they don't even
need a *reasonable suspicion* (which is a specific legal test) or even
any grounds at all, they just have to assert that they (the Feds)
think you're a terrorist. Noice, welcome to the CCCP down under.

> Psst, I've got a dozen phone SIM cards in my desk.

I hope you don't have a cousin in England

JL
(ahh you'll be fine, you've got the right skin colour)
theo - 25 Sep 2008 08:18 GMT
> > Psst, I've got a dozen phone SIM cards in my desk.
>
> I hope you don't have a cousin in England
>
> JL
> (ahh you'll be fine, you've got the right skin colour)

Yes indeed.
I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
them off the street and make us all safer". Mick wanted a 100 point
identity check (cheque, Czech?) for SIM cards to get us all safe. He
didn't seem to be aware that there are 23,000 mobile phones, complete
with SIM cards, lost every week in OZ. :-)
You really gotta laugh.

Theo
Nev.. - 25 Sep 2008 09:28 GMT
> Yes indeed.
> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
> them off the street and make us all safer". Mick wanted a 100 point
> identity check (cheque, Czech?) for SIM cards to get us all safe. He
> didn't seem to be aware that there are 23,000 mobile phones, complete
> with SIM cards, lost every week in OZ. :-)

Hasn't there _always_ been a 100 point identity check to register a SIM
card in Australia?

Nev..
'07 XB12X
Matt Palmer - 25 Sep 2008 10:49 GMT
Nev.. is of the opinion:

>> Yes indeed.
>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Hasn't there _always_ been a 100 point identity check to register a SIM
> card in Australia?

When I got a pre-paid account back around 2002, all I had to do was call up
a number and give my name and whatnot -- and there was no verification or
anything as far as I can tell.  It always struck me as a little... thin.

Obviously, if you're getting a post-paid account it's a bit different, since
there's credit checks and whatnot to be done, but they just want enough info
to make sure that you're at least marginally capable of paying what they're
asking, it's not a 100 point check.

- Matt
Nev.. - 25 Sep 2008 14:14 GMT
> Nev.. is of the opinion:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> to make sure that you're at least marginally capable of paying what they're
> asking, it's not a 100 point check.

Ok so my use of the term '100 point check' was taken too literally.  A
photo drivers licence, a credit card and/or a utility bill with your
name and address on it is 'a 100 point check' in whatever terminology
you wish to use.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
BT Humble - 25 Sep 2008 23:48 GMT
> When I got a pre-paid account back around 2002, all I had to do was call up
> a number and give my name and whatnot -- and there was no verification or
> anything as far as I can tell.  It always struck me as a little... thin.

It's still that way in Fiji.  I went to the phone shop and asked for a
SIM, then was somewhat startled when all they wanted was $20 and no
ID.

It doesn't work in my phone back here, though.

BTH
jl - 25 Sep 2008 12:29 GMT
>> Yes indeed.
>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Hasn't there _always_ been a 100 point identity check to register a SIM
> card in Australia?

No only bank accounts and other financial products

JL
Nev.. - 25 Sep 2008 14:10 GMT
>>> Yes indeed.
>>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> No only bank accounts and other financial products

That's a legal requirement for them, but it doesn't mean other
industries don't require similar amounts of ID.

When I got a prepaid phone back around 1999/2000 I had to produce -the
equivalent of- 100 points of ID at the Telstra shop.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
Johno - 26 Sep 2008 00:07 GMT
>>>> Yes indeed.
>>>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>Nev..
>'07 XB12X

Seeing as it is you Nev, we can understand why :)

Johno

Beer mate?
jonz - 30 Sep 2008 09:25 GMT
>>>> Yes indeed.
>>>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> When I got a prepaid phone back around 1999/2000 I had to produce -the
> equivalent of- 100 points of ID at the Telstra shop.

  bought a vodafone sim card and $18 credit ($20 all up) from woolies
last week....activated it via vodaphone voice recognition, name, address
 and nsw driver lic. no. supplied......up and running.....:^)

> Nev..
> '07 XB12X
Kevin Gleeson - 30 Sep 2008 23:55 GMT
>>>>> Yes indeed.
>>>>> I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>last week....activated it via vodaphone voice recognition, name, address
>  and nsw driver lic. no. supplied......up and running.....:^)

I switched over to prepaid about a year ago after 20 years of
contract. I've used Telstra, Optus and Vodaphone. No credit check,
just your address. They don't care. If you are paying fr the calls
before they use them, why would they? I even got a Telstra pre-paid
while I was in credit default on the contract after I got back from
Britain and was broke and couldn't pay my phone bill which had blown
out to silly proportions. You give them money, they'll give you a SIM.
theo - 26 Sep 2008 00:16 GMT
> > Yes indeed.
> > I was considering sending my Sims to Mick Keelty as a gift to "get
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Hasn't there _always_ been a 100 point identity check to register a SIM
> card in Australia?

If you're opening a new account with a phone service provider they
will certainly want you to prove that the bill will not go to nowhere.
Nothing to do with a SIM card though. They just want you to prove that
you are giving them a real address and that iit is yours.

I have about 25-30 mobile phones all registered to me (as the account
holder). I hand them out to whom I see fit. When I want some more SIM
cards I call my mobile provider and say "I've got no SIM cards", a
half dozen arrive in the mail next day. When I want to activate one I
email the SIM card number, and the phone number I want it attached to,
to my provider and it is working in half an hour. I have a stack of
old SIMs in desk.

Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
SIM card, block the old handset, activate the new SIm with the old
phone number and send him on his way. Did all that without getting out
of my chair.

Theo
jl - 26 Sep 2008 01:36 GMT
> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
> SIM card, block the old handset, activate the new SIm with the old
> phone number and send him on his way. Did all that without getting out
> of my chair.

That's great service - can't possibly be Telstra, surely ?

JL
theo - 26 Sep 2008 05:42 GMT
> > Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
> > had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> That's great service - can't possibly be Telstra, surely ?

Yup Telstra. It's not difficult to deal with Telstra and be treated
reasonably. I get an assigned Telstra rep, and an assigned mobilenet
rep, both of who regularly contact me, and I ahve their emails and
direct phone numbers. We're on a corporate plus plan where all calls
between the office and the 25 odd phones are free both ways as well as
all calls between those mobiles. All you have to do is spend $2500 a
month, and have more than 20 mobiles. OK, that last bit may not be for
everyone.

Theo
Knobdoodle - 26 Sep 2008 15:36 GMT
........ All you have to do is spend $2500 a
month, and have more than 20 mobiles. OK, that last bit may not be for
everyone.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
gNatalie must be close to qualifying!
Signature

Clem

jl - 27 Sep 2008 14:21 GMT
>>> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
>>> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> reasonably. ....All you have to do is spend $2500 a
> month, and have more than 20 mobiles.

<sigh> Well I'm pleased to hear that *someone* gets decent service out
of Telstra

JL
Knobdoodle - 27 Sep 2008 14:28 GMT
<sigh> Well I'm pleased to hear that *someone* gets decent service out
> of Telstra

Hey; they give service.  Just like when a bull "services" a cow!
Signature

Knob

Bill_h - 27 Sep 2008 14:45 GMT
> <sigh> Well I'm pleased to hear that *someone* gets decent service out
>> of Telstra
>>
>Hey; they give service.  Just like when a bull "services" a cow!

Yup, I've been 'serviced' by Telstra...
Toosmoky - 27 Sep 2008 16:23 GMT
> Yup, I've been 'serviced' by Telstra...

Haven't we all? <waddles away bowlegged>...

Signature

Toosmoky
Work to ride, Ride to Work...
http://users.tpg.com.au/smokey61

Marty H - 27 Sep 2008 14:42 GMT
> >>> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
> >>> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> JL

the company I work for are one of Telstra's largest customers with
several hundred of thousands of connections with them and they treat
us like total and utter sh.t...
Nev.. - 27 Sep 2008 15:52 GMT
>>>>> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
>>>>> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> several hundred of thousands of connections with them and they treat
> us like total and utter sh.t...

You're not a customer.  You're a competitor that they're being forced to
share their infrastructure with so that you can make a profit at they're
 expense.  You should be thankful that they treat you that well.  :P

Nev..
'07 XB12X
Nev.. - 27 Sep 2008 16:05 GMT
>>>>>> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
>>>>>> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> share their infrastructure with so that you can make a profit at they're
>  expense.  You should be thankful that they treat you that well.  :P

..and they're expensive !

Nev..
'07 XB12X
I mentioned the war once but I think I got away with it.
GB - 27 Sep 2008 21:36 GMT
> the company I work for are one of Telstra's largest customers with
> several hundred of thousands of connections with them and they treat
> us like total and utter sh.t...

Someone at the top needs to arrange to 'forget' to pay the bill.
Just one month ought to do it :-)

The Australian Government offers a free mediation service that
deals with Telstra on behalf of Telstra customers. They're called
the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman. I use the TIO with (on?)
Telstra quite regularly.

GB
Signature

My friend Steve is an atheist. He has a bumper sticker that reads "Honk
if you love Jesus". When someone honks, he gives them the finger.

Kevin Gleeson - 28 Sep 2008 03:57 GMT
>>>> Last month one of our guys had a phone stolen from his car (Duhh!), I
>>>> had a spare handset and it took all of five minutes to cancel the old
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
><sigh> Well I'm pleased to hear that *someone* gets decent service out
>of Telstra

I've always got decent service out of Telstra. The complaint I have
against them is that they are so much more expensive than the other
carriers. So at the moment I am on Vodaphone, even though they have
sh.t coverage here in Tas. I've just ordered a new phone that I notice
can handle dual SIMs. I haven't investigated it, but am hoping that
means I can put in a Telstra SIM as well and choose which carrier I
call out on. But I'm also thinking that means I'd have to have 2
mobile numbers which I doubt I want to go to. Phone will be here in a
week so I'll suss it out then.
Nev.. - 28 Sep 2008 11:12 GMT
> I've always got decent service out of Telstra. The complaint I have
> against them is that they are so much more expensive than the other
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> mobile numbers which I doubt I want to go to. Phone will be here in a
> week so I'll suss it out then.

A dual-SIM phone should be able to handle SIMs from 2 different networks
simultaneously.  Useful for people who need to carry an on-call work
phone without the need to carry around two handsets.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
GB - 25 Sep 2008 11:20 GMT
theo <theo@bekkers.com.au> wrote in news:2319839f-8ee3-4c59-9653-
f09bacb5886d@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com:
> He
> didn't seem to be aware that there are 23,000 mobile phones, complete
> with SIM cards, lost every week in OZ. :-)
> You really gotta laugh.

"I'll give you a thousand bucks, cash, for that phone of yours if
you don't report it lost for a week".

GB, laughable indeed.
Signature

My friend Steve is an atheist. He has a bumper sticker that reads "Honk
if you love Jesus". When someone honks, he gives them the finger.

GB - 25 Sep 2008 11:22 GMT
theo <theo@bekkers.com.au> wrote in news:72bc29e1-54ad-4f14-aade-
21a026ded2d6@v16g2000prc.googlegroups.com:
> The Fed police can pick you up for suspicion of anything at all, and
> hold you for 4 days without notifying any of your family. After they
> release you uncharged, and you tell your wife where you've been, they
> can jail you.

Insert the joke about the bloke who gets arrested by american military
police for inadvertantly flying his light aeroplane into Area 51. They
hold him for 48 hours, interrogate the crap out of him, eventually send
him on his way with strict instructions not to return and not to tell
anyone where he's been. He returns within 24 hours, this time with his
wife on board. "OK, you bastards explain it to her, she won't believe
me!"

GB
Signature

My friend Steve is an atheist. He has a bumper sticker that reads "Honk
if you love Jesus". When someone honks, he gives them the finger.

Nev.. - 25 Sep 2008 09:29 GMT
>>> Well given that I only recently came back from a ride day at Eastern
>>> Creek (pointed statement for any police orificers that may be viewing)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Well, maybe not for speeding.

Or drug use.  I'm forever astounded at the ability of high profile
media/sports/etc personalities in Australia (and around the world) to
use "I was taking illegal drugs and I'm putting myself in rehab" as
their excuse for behaviour and yet none of these people seem to ever get
charged with drug possession/use.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
theo - 26 Sep 2008 00:19 GMT
> Or drug use.  I'm forever astounded at the ability of high profile
> media/sports/etc personalities in Australia (and around the world) to
> use "I was taking illegal drugs and I'm putting myself in rehab" as
> their excuse for behaviour and yet none of these people seem to ever get
> charged with drug possession/use.

You referring to Malcolm Turnbull's "confession" yesterday?

Theo
Nev.. - 26 Sep 2008 13:39 GMT
>> Or drug use.  I'm forever astounded at the ability of high profile
>> media/sports/etc personalities in Australia (and around the world) to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> You referring to Malcolm Turnbull's "confession" yesterday?

No.  Ben Cousins comes immediately to mind, but there have been others.

Nev..
'07 XB12X
Johno - 22 Sep 2008 10:46 GMT
snip some...

>I'm coming to Canberra to steal an SV and turbocharge it.

And still have a slow girls bike mate!

Johno <hiding from Betty>

Beer?
Bamfy - 22 Sep 2008 12:16 GMT
Who was asking about Sv's old man?

*cough*

Bamfy :P

> snip some...
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Beer?
Zebee Johnstone - 22 Sep 2008 11:28 GMT
In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:02:19 +1000

>> Or you just ride ridiculously fast so air pressure takes the weight
>> off your wrists. Works for me.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> they just a consequence of me being old and arthritic? Wrists be fine, lower
> back be fine.... shoulders seem stuffed...

Which bit of the shoulders?

I found stretching the pecs helped with shoulder difficulties as short
pecs were pulling on them, and stretching the traps did too.

See
http://www.healthline.com/blogs/exercise_fitness/2007/03/nice-neck-stretch.html

and
http://www.healthline.com/blogs/exercise_fitness/2006/10/fixing-upper-back-and-n
eck-pain.html


the whole site has a lot of useful information about posture and it
leading to pain. Has helped me a lot.

The neck stretch was a major factor in dealing with shoulder problems
that referred down to my elbow tendons and meant I ended up selling
the hack Guzzi...

Zebee
- who bought the Norge instead so there's a silver (or red or black,
  but I like the silver) lining.

Zebee
bikerbetty - 22 Sep 2008 12:07 GMT
> In aus.motorcycles on Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:02:19 +1000
>>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> Which bit of the shoulders?

The worst bit to touch is the acromion.  Lifting with palms down is
particularly painful and movement is limited. Not quite so much with palms
upwards. It's in both shoulders, although left one is a recent development
(and has become worse than right one, which has been hurting for MONTHS) Few
months back the GP shrugged and said "arthritis, probably", so I thought no
more of it until the left one suddenly flared up (and HOW!) about 6 weeks
ago.

> I found stretching the pecs helped with shoulder difficulties as short
> pecs were pulling on them, and stretching the traps did too.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Zebee

Thanks for the stretches Zebee - I dragged my sorry self to a massage
therapist who untied some knots and gave me those very same stretches to do.
Yep, they've definitely helped wth the shoulder mobility, but so far, no
help with the pain. Hoping that will come with time. If not, I'm off to have
things seen to when I get back from PI. I know I kid around about being old
and arthritic, but this is bloody ridiculo