Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Motorcycles / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

1980 Honda Goldwing vs. newer models

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mike_in_Nebraska - 29 Aug 2007 14:06 GMT
I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.

I find that it cruises best at 60-65 mph and gets the best fuel
efficiency.  When I push it to 75 mph for the interstate, it feels
like it's "pushing" - rpm's are at ~5100 and fuel efficiency drops by
8-10 mpg.  My assumption is that it was made for a time when lower
speed limits were in place, so the gearing is made for lower speeds.
Am I right?

And what about newer models (2001 and newer)?  Do they cruise better
at interstate speeds?

Many thanks in advance from a new rider (kids are out of the house
(finally) so the wife and I can have fun again),

Mike
Nebraska
Mark Olson - 29 Aug 2007 14:34 GMT
> I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
> miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> speed limits were in place, so the gearing is made for lower speeds.
> Am I right?

No.

> And what about newer models (2001 and newer)?  Do they cruise better
> at interstate speeds?
>
> Many thanks in advance from a new rider (kids are out of the house
> (finally) so the wife and I can have fun again),

Your GL1100 should be perfectly happy at 75 mph.  Gas mileage will go
down a bit, but an 8-10 mpg drop from your 60-65 mph mileage sounds
excessive to me.  My GL1200 would get close to 50 if I rode *very*
slowly (50 mph max), 45 mpg at normal highway speeds (60-65), and
about 40 mpg at freeway speeds (~75 mph).  These numbers are in US
gallons.

I have no first hand experience of gas mileage, other than short test
rides on GL1500s and GL1800s, but from what I hear they get no better
mpg than the four cylinder wings.

I suspect you may have a carburetor issue.  I would check fuel levels,
perhaps strip and clean the carbs, verify the jets haven't been swapped
for bigger ones, and check the air filter to see if it's dirty.

Signature

'01 SV650SK1  '99 EX250-F13  '98 ZG1000-A13
OMF #7

Mike_in_Nebraska - 29 Aug 2007 14:47 GMT
Thanks for the input.  My mileage is about 44-48 mpg at 60-65 and
drops to 35-37 at 75.  Hadn't thought about carbuerator issues; I'll
get it into the shop for a check.  I could certainly be wrong, but I
feel that bike should just purr at interstate speeds - and it doesn't;
it purrs at 60-65.

> > I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
> > miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
> '01 SV650SK1  '99 EX250-F13  '98 ZG1000-A13
> OMF #7
ottguit@hotmail.com - 29 Aug 2007 21:06 GMT
> Thanks for the input.  My mileage is about 44-48 mpg at 60-65 and
> drops to 35-37 at 75.  Hadn't thought about carbuerator issues; I'll
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> > > speed limits were in place, so the gearing is made for lower speeds.
> > > Am I right?

Are you using the Stock dimension sized tires, nothing too different?
Bg
Chuck Rhode - 29 Aug 2007 21:19 GMT
From: Chuck Rhode <CRhode@LacusVeris.com>
Subject: Re: 1980 Honda Goldwing vs. newer models
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 15:18:26 -0500
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
    moment of clarity.)
Message-Id: <pan.2007.08.29.20.18.26.717279@LacusVeris.com>
References: <1188392819.825731.187040@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
    <13datejdnjee6d7@corp.supernews.com>
    <1188395267.911632.24400@w3g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
To: Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_webb@whoopingcrane.org>
X-Pan-Internal-Attribution: Mike_in_Nebraska wrote this on Wed, 29 Aug 2007
    06:47:47 -0700.  My reply is below.
X-Pan-Internal-Sendlater-To: Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_webb@whoopingcrane.org>
X-Pan-Internal-Post-Server: Excel.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Mike_in_Nebraska wrote this on Wed, 29 Aug 2007 06:47:47 -0700.  My
reply is below.

> Thanks for the input.  My mileage is about 44-48 mpg at 60-65 and
> drops to 35-37 at 75.  Hadn't thought about carbuerator issues; I'll
> get it into the shop for a check.  I could certainly be wrong, but I
> feel that bike should just purr at interstate speeds - and it
> doesn't; it purrs at 60-65.

I'm running an engine with about 30K miles.  I used to run an engine
with 100K miles.  Both worked noticeably harder at 75 mph than at 65.
However, I, too, have had carburetor issues.

I believe your 1980 GW is a GL1100 with electronic ignition and
conventional carburetion.  These things are tuned at idle.  If spark
timing is off a little, that might manifest itself as loss of power at
high speeds.  I should think that anything wrong with the idle
circuits in the carbs wouldn't affect high-speed operation all that
much, though, and after all your mileage is nominal.  If float levels
are not consistent, float-valve sieves are plugged, the fuel filter is
plugged, or the fuel pump is weak, you may be running lean on one or
more cylinders at speed, but these are marginal possibilities.  (The
fuel filter is cake to replace, and you ought to do it right away on a
new used bike and check the condition of the fuel hoses and clamps,
too.)

My money is on poor carburetor synchronization as the diagnosis of
your problem.  Carb sync'ing can be done at home with vacuum gauges.
It needs to be done frequently because the Oldwings don't stay
synchronized very well for more than a few hundred miles.  When all
cylinders are pulling together, you'll have much more pep.  You'll
feel smarter acceleration, but the effect on high-speed operation is
less profound.

Concerning fuel additives -- one word: Marvel Mystery Oil. MMO is
kerosene with oil of wintergreen for customer appeal.  An
ounce/tankful of gasoline will lube your carb sliders as well or
better than leaded gas used to.

Signature

.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. 1979 Honda Goldwing GL1000 (Geraldine)
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 68° — Wind NNE 10 mph — Sky overcast. Light rain; mist.

sleazy rider - 29 Aug 2007 15:21 GMT
On Aug 29, 9:06 am, Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_w...@whoopingcrane.org>
wrote:
> I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
> miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Mike
> Nebraska

First off, try some Seafoam in the gas to clean any easy to remove
gunk from the carbs.  Your mileage is about spot on from my
experience.  I've owned a GL1100, 1200 and 1800 at some point.  The
1100 was purchased with 21k on the clock and got what you're
describing for mileage.  The 1200 was a little hard to estimate, as it
had a sidecar attached.  ;)  The GL1800 got 44mpg at any speeds over
65 and if I kept it under 65, it was a tad better.  The best I ever
got was riding with the GWRRA Chapter out to Americade.  One tank
netted 51mpg!  Yeah, they were that slow.  To answer the last
question, yes, it cruised all day at 75+ without breathing hard and
got 40 mpg at those speeds.  There might be another in my near future
if the two current bikes sell by spring.  Its either that or a new
Connie.  <g>
Mike_in_Nebraska - 29 Aug 2007 15:25 GMT
Great info!  I'll do that with the Seafoam (I assume it's readily
available at car parts stores?)  And then get it into the shop for a
once-over on the carb.
We just got this one (our first in over 15 years) in May and are
already thinking of a newer model.  Love the Goldwings!

Mike

> First off, try some Seafoam in the gas to clean any easy to remove
> gunk from the carbs.  Your mileage is about spot on from my
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> if the two current bikes sell by spring.  Its either that or a new
> Connie.  <g>
sleazy rider - 29 Aug 2007 15:29 GMT
On Aug 29, 10:25 am, Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_w...@whoopingcrane.org>
wrote:
> Great info!  I'll do that with the Seafoam (I assume it's readily
> available at car parts stores?)  And then get it into the shop for a
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mike

Yes, any major auto parts store should have it.  Most dealers won't
touch your bike anymore.  It's too old and a carb rebuild is nearly
$600 from them.  Parts are not readily available from Honda either.
Ride it a couple tanks with the additive and enjoy.
Unrevealed Source - 30 Aug 2007 12:25 GMT
I have a GL1200 ('84 Standard) and my local Honda dealer doesn't even bat an
eye servicing it.  Never had a problem with them getting parts either.  They
may not want to work on an old 750 or something like that, but I think the
Goldwings are pretty much supported for life.

> On Aug 29, 10:25 am, Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_w...@whoopingcrane.org>
> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> $600 from them.  Parts are not readily available from Honda either.
> Ride it a couple tanks with the additive and enjoy.
Chuck Rhode - 30 Aug 2007 13:54 GMT
Unrevealed Source wrote this on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:25:14 -0400.  My
reply is below.

> I have a GL1200 ('84 Standard) and my local Honda dealer doesn't
> even bat an eye servicing it.  Never had a problem with them getting
> parts either.  They may not want to work on an old 750 or something
> like that, but I think the Goldwings are pretty much supported for
> life.

I've had a dealer play hard to get about servicing Geraldine (1979).
What a difference five years makes, eh?  There are parts that are no
longer in stock for her: Centrifugal spark advance, brake pistons, and
swing-arm bearing collars come to mind.  Brake pistons are available
from third parties.  Swing-arm bearing collars can be fabricated by
your local machine shop.

Signature

.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. 1979 Honda Goldwing GL1000 (Geraldine)
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 58° — Wind N 8 mph

Mike_in_Nebraska - 30 Aug 2007 13:54 GMT
Thanks to all the posts; great info.

> Unrevealed Source wrote this on Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:25:14 -0400.  My
> reply is below.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> .. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
> .. 58? - Wind N 8 mph
Albrecht - 29 Aug 2007 17:04 GMT
>Great info!  I'll do that with the Seafoam (I assume it's readily
>available at car parts stores?)

Don't waste your time and money with Seafoam. You're not trying to store an
outboard motor. Seafoam has mild solvents and oil to stop the cylinder walls
of a two stroke engine from rusting.

Techron Concentrate is a waste of time too. It's designed to clean deposits
off your intake valves.

Fuel system cleaners won't do the job either. They contain oily solvents that
clean fuel injectors.

Berryman B12 Chemtool Choke and Carburetor Cleaner contains toluene, acetone,
methyl alcohol, xylene, etc, and comes in a handy 15 ounce non-aerosol can.

B12 quickly dissolves the gum and varnish clogging your carburetors.

Just mix 4 or 5 ounces of B12 with a tank of fresh gas and go for a ride and
it will clean your carbs. You'll know the carbs are cleaner when the idle RPM
increases.

If you don't know where your idle speed screw is at, find out, because you'll
be turning the speed down.
Mike_in_Nebraska - 29 Aug 2007 17:15 GMT
Thanks, I didn't know that.

On Aug 29, 11:04 am, "Albrecht via MotorcycleKB.com" <u33665@uwe>
wrote:
> >Great info!  I'll do that with the Seafoam (I assume it's readily
> >available at car parts stores?)
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> --
> Message posted via MotorcycleKB.comhttp://www.motorcyclekb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/bike/200708/1
Unrevealed Source - 30 Aug 2007 12:22 GMT
Incorrect.  Seafoam works great.

>>Great info!  I'll do that with the Seafoam (I assume it's readily
>>available at car parts stores?)
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> you'll
> be turning the speed down.
chateau.murray@btinternet.com - 29 Aug 2007 16:20 GMT
On 29 Aug, 15:06, Mike_in_Nebraska <mike_w...@whoopingcrane.org>
wrote:
> I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
> miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> like it's "pushing" - rpm's are at ~5100 and fuel efficiency drops by
> 8-10 mpg.

I'd expect this.

My assumption is that it was made for a time when lower
> speed limits were in place, so the gearing is made for lower speeds.
> Am I right?

No

> And what about newer models (2001 and newer)?  Do they cruise better
> at interstate speeds?

Yes
Ben Kaufman - 29 Aug 2007 17:43 GMT
>I recently purchased a lovingly cared for 1980 Goldwing with 35,000
>miles.  No complaints, but am curious about it's top end.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>Mike
>Nebraska

Apparently, it wasn't that lovingly taken care of or you would not be
experiencing this problem.  Generally, carburetion problems happen at lower RPMs
and ignition and valve problems manifest at higher RPMs.
Find a good mechanic and get it checked out.  That bike should be able to ride
at  100mph with little effort.

Ben
Mike_in_Nebraska - 29 Aug 2007 17:53 GMT
On Aug 29, 11:43 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-
doll...@pobox.com> wrote:

Will do. The couple I bought it from used it for car/bike shows and
rode it only a couple times a year.

> Apparently, it wasn't that lovingly taken care of or you would not be
> experiencing this problem.  Generally, carburetion problems happen at lower RPMs
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Ben
Ben Kaufman - 29 Aug 2007 21:48 GMT
>On Aug 29, 11:43 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-
>doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>>
>> Ben

Either that or it's actually the 2nd time around the speedo <g>

Ben
Robert Bolton - 30 Aug 2007 02:33 GMT
> On Aug 29, 11:43 am, Ben Kaufman <spaXm-mXe-anXd-paXy-5000-
> doll...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Will do. The couple I bought it from used it for car/bike shows and
> rode it only a couple times a year.

Don't know what you've got for carbs, but the carb slides on my Nighthawk
750 used to stick after sitting all winter.  You might have gummed up
carbs if they seldom rode it, but as others have pointed out you probably
shouldn't expect to get better mileage at 75 than 65.

Robert
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.