Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Motorcycles / June 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Tiered license follow-up

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BryanUT - 21 Jun 2008 00:15 GMT
Ok, I feel duped by the MSF.

Several friends at work pay close attention to which representatives vote
for which legislation.

Upon futher investigation, we can't find any reference to any recent laws
passed that mention the previously mentioned regulations.

In other words, utahridered.com is full of sh.t.  Yes there are changes but
not as reported by the local MSF web site.

So as far as I am concerned, the MSF (local) is a fear mongering
organization.  So f.ck them and their ERC.  I'll just do another track day.

Sorry Tim, but the MSF is an extorcionest (sp?) organization.  At this point
I don't think they are about safety, I think they are about profit.  Do your
own google search, I am not the first to make this observation.
Mark Olson - 21 Jun 2008 00:20 GMT
> Ok, I feel duped by the MSF.

Are you just getting to this point now?  MCN readers have known
about this for quite some time.

From memory, Wendy Moon and David L. Hough have had some less than
complimentary things to say about the MSF.

Signature

'07 FJR13AW  '99 EX250-F13
OMF #7

BryanUT - 21 Jun 2008 00:30 GMT
=>
> Are you just getting to this point now?  MCN readers have known
> about this for quite some time.

Not really, out of respect for Tim, I've never brought this up in this
forum.  Also, I had a very good experience with my MSF beginner course.

Wow, we agree again, somthing must be wrong. :)
AlFire - 21 Jun 2008 00:39 GMT
> Not really, out of respect for Tim, I've never brought this up in this
> forum.  Also, I had a very good experience with my MSF beginner course.

my memories from BRC I took in 2004 are very positive and in spite quite
ridiculous choice of first bike (with help of AMS :-) I ended up with
over 20,000 happy (s)miles (tm) and one minor crash which was only due
to my fault.

many things I learned and saw are still in my head as a constant
reminder what the riding is about.

Signature

Andy
'04 FZ-1

BryanUT - 21 Jun 2008 01:07 GMT
>> Not really, out of respect for Tim, I've never brought this up in this
>> forum.  Also, I had a very good experience with my MSF beginner course.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> many things I learned and saw are still in my head as a constant reminder
> what the riding is about.

Yes, same here, though (knock on wood, no crashes).
Mark Olson - 21 Jun 2008 00:46 GMT
> =>
>> Are you just getting to this point now?  MCN readers have known
>> about this for quite some time.
>
> Not really, out of respect for Tim, I've never brought this up in this
> forum.  Also, I had a very good experience with my MSF beginner course.

I'm entirely not sure what you mean by "out of respect for Tim".

IIRC Tim's tenure as an MSF instructor did not coincide with
the 'new and improved' MSF.  In other words I am pretty sure
Tim's opinion of the MSF's current direction is aligned pretty
well with that of most motorcyclists who are in the know.

I had a good experience with the MSF ERC, too, but that was
probably in spite of the policies coming down from the top
rather than because of them.

Signature

'07 FJ13AW  '99 EX250-F13
OMF #7

BryanUT - 21 Jun 2008 01:05 GMT
=>
> I'm entirely not sure what you mean by "out of respect for Tim".

Despite my reputation, and Tim's boasting about his life long experience as
an MSF instructor,
I am not a troll and I'd rather not go looking for flame wars.

That is what I meant.
Mark Olson - 21 Jun 2008 01:24 GMT
> =>
>> I'm entirely not sure what you mean by "out of respect for Tim".
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> That is what I meant.

I still don't get it.  Apparently, you think that if you dissed
the MSF, that Tim would take that as a personal affront.  Why?

As I said, my understanding is that there is no love lost between
Tim and the MSF, but you seem to think that is not the case.

Signature

'07 FJ13AW  '99 EX250-F13
OMF #7

BryanUT - 21 Jun 2008 01:39 GMT
>> =>
>>> I'm entirely not sure what you mean by "out of respect for Tim".
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> I still don't get it.  Apparently, you think that if you dissed
> the MSF, that Tim would take that as a personal affront.  Why?

Are you serious?

OK, here is the deal.  I respect teachers, no matter where/what they teach.
I have a degree in Elementary Education, I taught Red Cross swimming lessons
through High School, I became a Certified Ski Instructor.

My mother and both my sisters were teachers.

Tim instructed motorcyclists for many years and I just felt better leaving
it at that.

> As I said, my understanding is that there is no love lost between
> Tim and the MSF, but you seem to think that is not the case.

Interesting.  You've met and ridden with Tim, I haven't, I may have missed
this.
Mark Olson - 21 Jun 2008 01:48 GMT
> "Mark Olson" <olsonm@tiny.invalid> wrote in message

>> I still don't get it.  Apparently, you think that if you dissed
>> the MSF, that Tim would take that as a personal affront.  Why?
>
> Are you serious?

Totally.

> OK, here is the deal.  I respect teachers, no matter where/what they teach.

OK...

> Tim instructed motorcyclists for many years and I just felt better leaving
> it at that.

It sounds like you've got something bad to say about the MSF but
you were afraid to say it because you didn't want to offend Tim.

I still don't get why you think that.  Since you say you've never
met Tim, it's a safe bet you can't have been taught by Tim, so
whatever you have to say about the MSF, it won't have much to do
with your opinion of Tim's competency as a teacher.

>> As I said, my understanding is that there is no love lost between
>> Tim and the MSF, but you seem to think that is not the case.

> Interesting.  You've met and ridden with Tim, I haven't, I may have missed
> this.

I think you're worrying too much about what someone you've never
met might think about what you have to say about something that
concerns you.  If you have an honest critique of the MSF or the
MSF curriculum, why not air it, and don't worry about what Tim
thinks?  He's an adult and can accept the fact that people have
legitimate differences of opinion.

Signature

'07 FJ13AW  '99 EX250-F13
OMF #7

tomorrow@erols.com - 22 Jun 2008 02:57 GMT
> > "Mark Olson" <ols...@tiny.invalid> wrote in message
> >> I still don't get it.  Apparently, you think that if you dissed
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
> thinks?  He's an adult and can accept the fact that people have
> legitimate differences of opinion.

I am not, and I can not!!    WAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
P. Roehling - 21 Jun 2008 08:42 GMT
> Despite my reputation, and Tim's boasting about his life long experience
> as an MSF instructor,
> I am not a troll and I'd rather not go looking for flame wars.

Bryan,

As you may be aware, Tim and I seldom see eye to eye, but I cannot recall
him ever "boasting" about having been an MSF instructor, any more than I can
recall you "boasting" about your work with computers. Yes, both of you have
mentioned those facts when they legitimately bear on the subjects at hand,
but in both cases that's simply a matter of bringing your personal expertise
to bear in backing your online opinions. As such, it's not "boasting" in
either party's case; simply a bald statement of having been there, done
that, and wrung out the tee-shirt afterwards.

One of the advantages (and yes, there are a few) of newsgroups is that it
gives you a chance to learn from people who have expertise in fields that
you have never encountered, and so long as people don't begin their posts
with "Hi! My name is so-on-and-so-forth and I'm better than *ANYBODY* at
(insert subject of your choice)" I don't see a problem with them using their
legitimate backgrounds as a big club with which to whack the folks who don't
know what they're talking about.

I, for instance, have never taught an MSF class, or, for that matter, taken
one. So you'll seldom see me posting on the subject except to say that I
think they're a good idea.
I *was*, on the other hand, a track instructor at the late-lamented L.A.
MSF's track days, and when someone makes an outrageous claim such as (just
picking one out of the hat here...) stating that motorcycles steer via
leaning, and that you don't need to learn how to countersteer until you've
already been riding for a few years, I've not been reticent about stating my
qualifications for telling them why I think they're nuts.

Boasting, in my mind, is bragging about how good you are at something
*without provocation*. But if we're to call it bragging whenever someone
states their bona-fides as qualifications for their opinions, then we're
left in a situation where everyone's opinion is just as good as anyone
else's. And while that may be a worthwhile goal in the minds of some
psychologists, it sheds no light on reality.

Fact is, some of us *are* experts in some fields, and I'd much rather see
posters sharing their specialized knowledge with us rather than saying to
themselves, "Gee, maybe I shouldn't mention my PhD in nuclear physics even
though the subject is nuclear waste. Bryan might think I was boasting..."

(Okay. I'm exaggerating for effect. But you get the point.)
Nate Bargmann - 24 Jun 2008 19:00 GMT
A sage once said something along the lines of, "It ain't braggin' if you
can do it!"

- Nate >>

Signature

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds,
the pessimist fears this is true."

tomorrow@erols.com - 22 Jun 2008 02:56 GMT
> =>
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> That is what I meant.

I don't recall boasting about my life long experience as an MSF
instructor.   Perhaps you can refresh my memory on that.  Like, maybe
with a cite?

Not a request for a flamewar, either, but I would rather like to see a
bit of decorum when people are talking about me.
Road Glidin' Don - 24 Jun 2008 19:57 GMT
On Jun 21, 7:56 pm, "tomor...@erols.com" <tomor...@erols.com> wrote:

> Not a request for a flamewar, either, but I would rather like to see a
> bit of decorum when people are talking about me.

Truthfullness is nice too, if you can get it.
Stephen! - 21 Jun 2008 05:28 GMT
> In other words, utahridered.com is full of sh.t.  Yes there are
> changes but not as reported by the local MSF web site.

 As may have already been pointed out to you, I think you'll find that
"utahridered.com" is *NOT* an MSF web site.  It may be run by folks who are
MSF certified and provide MSF classes, but it is not an MSF web site.

 It is © of "utah motorcycle association"(sic)

Signature

RCOS #7
IBA# 11465
http://imagesdesavions.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

tomorrow@erols.com - 22 Jun 2008 03:01 GMT
> > In other words, utahridered.com is full of sh.t.  Yes there are
> > changes but not as reported by the local MSF web site.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>   It is © of "utah motorcycle association"(sic)

The distinction between the MSF and its national curriculum design
(and RiderCoach training & certification procedures) and the rider
training programs of the various states is one that I have laboriously
attempted to point out for more than a decade on usenet, seldom with
any apparent effect.

Nice try, and I wish you the best of luck in your attempt.
Stephen! - 29 Jun 2008 04:25 GMT
"tomorrow@erols.com" <tomorrow@erols.com> wrote in news:9fd107dc-c13a-
43d2-8aa8-625fdd19f05c@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:

> The distinction between the MSF and its national curriculum design
> (and RiderCoach training & certification procedures) and the rider
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Nice try, and I wish you the best of luck in your attempt.

 Far be it from me to be an apologist for MSF[1], but I do have a
distaste for miscast dispersions, regardless the target.

[1]  We had a bit of a one-sided falling out when they got more
interested in "happy graduates" rather than successful riders.

Signature

RCOS #7
IBA# 11465
http://imagesdesavions.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

tomorrow@erols.com - 29 Jun 2008 17:26 GMT
> "tomor...@erols.com" <tomor...@erols.com> wrote in news:9fd107dc-c13a-
> 43d2-8aa8-625fdd19f...@t54g2000hsg.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> [1]  We had a bit of a one-sided falling out when they got more
> interested in "happy graduates" rather than successful riders.

I don't care for the current curriculum; I think it is a step down
from the previous one, and I didn't like the revamp of the instructors
as coaches, and I don't like the power political hegemony games that
the MSF has (apparently, based on some accounts) been playing within
the realm of motorcycle safety.

That said, I think we both agree that there remains a lot of
misperceptions and outright misunderstandings of the role that the MSF
has played and does play in motorcycle rider training in the U.S., and
there remains the fact that the MSF STILL does more in what I consider
to be a "diominished capacity" to save motorcycle riders lives in the
U.S. than any other organization, and does so by a huge margin.

That doesn't pretend to say that there is not room for improvement,
but some of the criticisms and many of the critics go far beyond
offering constructive advice for improvements.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.