 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
| HomeDiscussion Groups General MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnicalCountry Specific Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)Related Topics CarsBoatsMore Topics ... |
Motorcycle Forum / General / Motorcycles / September 2008Will you take "The Pledge"?
Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put it politely, "whacked". Then he went over the top and started threatening lawsuits. At that point many of us took "the pledge". And thus all his posts were just ignored, not kill filed, just ignored. Conservatives, Liberals, Harley riders, Duc riders, many of us put aside our differences and took the pledge. There are relapses, but for the most part the pledge has been kept. A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he has kicked a well respected man while he was down. [1] Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] [1] further explanation should not be necessary. [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put > it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. who? >> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > who? Which who? The AMS poster or the reeky poster? >> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put >> it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >> A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he has >> kicked a well respected man while he was down. [1] f.ck off, little bitch. >> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] f.ck off, little bitch. >> [1] further explanation should not be necessary. >> [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. And to your regularly scheduled f.cking off, you little bitch. BTW, Paul R understands my posts a damned sight better than you do. So f.ck off, little bitch.  SignatureClick here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put > it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > There are relapses, but for the most part the pledge has been kept. LOL I had forgotten about that.....I see TTT still posting so he didn't end up in jail. :) Who was that and what are they posting under at the moment? > A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he has > kicked a well respected man while he was down. [1] [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. >> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > Who was that and what are they posting under at the moment? The AMS poster (to give him a little credit) does not morph his on-line name. I know it is hard, but take the new pledge. Please. >>> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >>> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > I know it is hard, but take the new pledge. Please. who? > LOL I had forgotten about that.....I see TTT still posting so he > didn't > end up in jail. :) Couldn't even get an attorney after I posted my phone number either. Crazy blowhards just ain't what they used to be I guess. > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to > put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. What a pompous, hollow, meaningless gesture. Will you chastise and make pariahs of reneg'ers? Frame the list of pledges as a petition against insanity? No thanks. As with matters of worship, I'll practice censorship as I see fit and according to my conscience. I don't see a need for your guidance or consent. >> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > What a pompous, hollow, meaningless gesture. As is every post on usenet. >Will you chastise and make pariahs of reneg'ers? What is a "reneg'ers"? >Frame the list of pledges as a petition against insanity? I didn't make a list. > No thanks. As with matters of worship, I'll practice censorship as I see > fit and according to my conscience. As we all should. >I don't see a need for your guidance or consent. I didn't ask you to do that. So I guess you aren't taking the pledge? You are welcome to continue to indulge THE non riding pissant. >>> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >>> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > So I guess you aren't taking the pledge? You are welcome to continue to > indulge THE non riding pissant. f.ck you. Pompous twit. I don't need your welcome. He doesn't need your consent. >>>> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >>>> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] >f.ck you. Pompous twit. I don't need your welcome. He doesn't need your >consent. Rock on, dude ;-) SignatureClick here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:08:32 -0500, "MikeWhy" > > >Pompous twit. I don't need your welcome. He doesn't need your > >consent. > > Rock on, dude ;-) Paul, believe it or not, this ain't about you, and maybe this isn't the best time to let you know, but you've been KF'ed for years. I haven't a clue what you said to get me noogie lumped by Brian's ball bat. This is about your freedom of speech, and I would kindly like to not have to remember why I put you in the looney bin in the first place. >> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:08:32 -0500, "MikeWhy" >> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >Paul, believe it or not, this ain't about you, and maybe this isn't >the best time to let you know, but you've been KF'ed for years. I No prob. That's what they're there for. Too bad Bryan doesn't know how to use his. I don't morph ( except in the RARE case, as a few years ago, when some a.shole decided to flood-forge me all over the place, thus I ended up with the variation I use ever since then ), because I respect everyone's right to not have to read my bullshit if they don't want to. >haven't a clue what you said to get me noogie lumped by Brian's ball I wasn't aware Brian noogies anyone over me. I think it was probably George Bush's doing. Him or Rove, most likely. >bat. This is about your freedom of speech, and I would kindly like to >not have to remember why I put you in the looney bin in the first >place. It's not because I'm f.cking nuts, I'm sure. The doctors told me so. They said I'm perfectly normal, it's just everyone else that's a little bit 'off'. SignatureClick here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm > >haven't a clue what you said to get me noogie lumped by Brian's ball > > I wasn't aware Brian noogies anyone over me. I think it was > probably George Bush's doing. Him or Rove, most likely. <Reads exchange> <fx: scratches head> <Re-reads exchange> <Gives up> Whoever described the US and Britain as two nations separated by a common language got it exactly right. I have *no idea* what the above means. Would anyone care to enlighten me? Otherwise, me ol' Chinas, me loaf will be buzzing until I head up the old apples tonight. SignatureBMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XT600E Honda CB400F & SH50 GHPOTHUF#1 chateaudotmurrayatidnetdotcom Nothing is more dangerous than an ignoramus with a workshop manual, a 'can-do' attitude and a cheap set of tools >> >haven't a clue what you said to get me noogie lumped by Brian's ball >> I wasn't aware Brian noogies anyone over me. I think it was >> probably George Bush's doing. Him or Rove, most likely. > <Reads exchange> > <fx: scratches head> > <Re-reads exchange> > <Gives up> > Whoever described the US and Britain as two nations separated by a > common language got it exactly right. I have *no idea* what the above > means. > Would anyone care to enlighten me? Otherwise, me ol' Chinas, me loaf > will be buzzing until I head up the old apples tonight. It's clear as mud to me, too, but, considering the source, I don't see your problem it. Signature.. Be Seeing You, .. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA .. Weather: http://LacusVeris.com/WX .. 60° — Wind NNW 3 mph On Sep 24, 9:18�pm, totallydeadmail...@yahoo.co.uk (The Older Gentleman) wrote: > > >haven't a clue what you said to get me noogie lumped by Brian's ball > Would anyone care to enlighten me? Otherwise, me ol' Chinas, me loaf > will be buzzing until I head up the old apples tonight. .p.jm should have said, "get my *noggin* lumped by Brian's ball". http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=noogie http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=noggin Loaf of Bread = Head Apples and Pears = Stairs > Nothing is more dangerous than an ignoramus with a workshop > manual, a 'can-do' attitude and a cheap set of tools Nothing ventured, nothing gained. What if a newbie mechanic screws up an old crock instead of letting it rust in a wretched condition? > "MikeWhy" <boat042-nospam@yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> Will you chastise and make pariahs of reneg'ers? > > What is a "reneg'ers"? <Governor William J. Le Petomane> Do you realize that that man is a rene... </Governor William J. Le Petomane> Signature"Outback" Jon - KC2BNE outback_jon@ver.no.sp.am.izon.net AMD Opteron 165 (@2.5) and 6.1 GHz of other AMD power... http://folding.stanford.edu - got folding? Team 53560 2006 ZG1000A Concours "Blueline" COG# 7385 CDA# 0157 > > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to > > put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Oh shut up f.ck face...he's talking about P. Personally I agree he's a little piece of sh.t. You don't like it fine, deal with your little attitude and piss off. -- Keith On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: > "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message > [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > > - Show quoted text - Oh shut up f.ck face...he's talking about P. Personally I agree he's a little piece of sh.t. You don't like it fine, deal with your little attitude and piss off. -- I don't care for him either way. That ain't the point is it? Are we choosing sides in the schoolyard now? > On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > little piece of sh.t. You don't like it fine, deal with your little > attitude and piss off. If thats the case I'm off to the sports shed for a softball bat...... :) >> On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>> "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > If thats the case I'm off to the sports shed for a softball bat...... > :) Not me , I'm gonna make some popcorn an' watch the show ! SignatureSnag '90 Ultra "Strider" '39 WLDD "Popcycle" Buncha cars and a truck >>> On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>> "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] > > Not me , I'm gonna make some popcorn an' watch the show ! Gimme your popcorn (waving softball bat in a menacing manner)..... >>>> On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: >>>>> "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Gimme your popcorn (waving softball bat in a menacing manner)..... I made enough to share ... SignatureSnag '90 Ultra "Strider" '39 WLDD "Popcycle" Buncha cars and a truck > >> On Sep 23, 5:58 pm, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: > >>> "BryanUT" <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in message [quoted text clipped - 43 lines] > > Not me , I'm gonna make some popcorn an' watch the show ! I'll get the beer then... > > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to > > put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > I see fit and according to my conscience. I don't see a need for your > guidance or consent. It's not censorship. The person being shunned is not prohibited from posting. Merely (most of) the rest of the community decides to not listen. I've seen this applied in other newsgroups, especially to hysterical one-issue posters who thrive on attention. You don't have to participate in the shunning, but at the risk of ending up as one who contributes to the reasons for it. SignatureTimberwoof <me at timberwoof dot com> faq: http://www.timberwoof.com/motorcycle/faq.shtml Ten Steps to Fascism: http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2064157,00.html >> > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, >> > to [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > participate in the shunning, but at the risk of ending up as one who > contributes to the reasons for it. Sure. But a pledge? Is this kindergarten or what? > Sure. But a pledge? Is this kindergarten or what? You read this group regularly and feel some doubt about it ? >> > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, >> > to [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > participate in the shunning, but at the risk of ending up as one who > contributes to the reasons for it. Sorry about the one liner. I owe you better. I should trust more in group dynamics, but something about Bryan... This isn't the first time I've reacted "violently" to his remarks. Pompous almost sums it up, but I still can't quite put my finger on just what it is. I didn't even know I had a button wired that way. The tempest in a teapot was P's comment -- singular -- about a certain Jag and antique bike collection. That's hardly a cause for censureship, certainly less so than calling on others to join sides in a strictly personal disagreement. The hoped for result is to silence the voice, or at least render it irrelevant. If that's not censorship, I don't what it means to censor. I'll stand by my "pompous," and raise it a "petty". <nods> I think that sums it up. Thanks for listening. > The tempest in a teapot was P's comment -- singular -- about a certain Jag > and antique bike collection. That's hardly a cause for censureship, > certainly less so than calling on others to join sides in a strictly > personal disagreement. It isn't "strictly personal" at all: Brian would have to be alone in detesting .p for that to be true, and this thread should demonstrate clearly that *that's* not the case. > The hoped for result is to silence the voice, or at > least render it irrelevant. If that's not censorship, I don't what it means > to censor. Easy one: to shun someone is to simply stop listening -and replying- to his rants. To censor him is to not allow him to post those rants in the first place. Since this is an unmoderated newsgroup, we don't have the power -not should we- to censor him, but shunning is a tradition that goes way back before the advent of newsgroups, and you even proposed a mini- version of it yourself not long ago when you suggested that you and I agree to plonk each other. On Sep 24, 12:24 am, "MikeWhy" <boat042-nos...@yahoo.com> wrote: > The tempest in a teapot was P's comment -- singular -- about a certain Jag > and antique bike collection. That's hardly a cause for censureship, > certainly less so than calling on others to join sides in a strictly > personal disagreement. It isn't "strictly personal" at all: Brian would have to be alone in detesting .p for that to be true, and this thread should demonstrate clearly that *that's* not the case. > The hoped for result is to silence the voice, or at > least render it irrelevant. If that's not censorship, I don't what it > means > to censor. Easy one: to shun someone is to simply stop listening -and replying- to his rants. To censor him is to not allow him to post those rants in the first place. Since this is an unmoderated newsgroup, we don't have the power -not should we- to censor him, but shunning is a tradition that goes way back before the advent of newsgroups, and you even proposed a mini- version of it yourself not long ago when you suggested that you and I agree to plonk each other. ------- Yup. Self moderation works, emphasis on self. Who can object to that? Yep, also, to the unmoderated group. And therein is the "problem". How do you censor an unmoderated group, short of defacing it by cancelling messages? When stuffing his literal fingers into his literal ears, if he even tried, didn't work; when logical discourse showed him less well equipped; and when outright flamage and taunting fails, where does he turn? Does he look to himself and maybe pick his game elsewhere? No, Bryan picked up his cellphone and appealed to the authorities -- us, in this case -- to settle his dispute. It's the cry of the weak willed, weak minded, and self-righteous. Ultimately, it's not far at all from the thinking that polarized us so strongly on the cigarette missile incident. Was he looking for moral support on a matter of importance? No. Simply, P gets under his skin, apparently in much the same way Bryan's sniveling gets under mine. In my mind, it comes down to this: the rightness of your position doesn't matter when you can fetch your big brother to come kick some butts. It's the gangsta mentality, and I won't brook it. Would it matter if I agreed even the slightest with his position? You already know the answer to that. How much prompting do *you* need to speak your mind? So, what's the point in asking for a group wide boycott if not to censor? And I do mean censor, not just censure. I can't find one. > So, what's the point in asking for a group wide boycott if not to censor? > And I do mean censor, not just censure. I can't find one. Obviously, to encourage a change in behavior. And as has already been mentioned, it can't possibly be "censorship" unless you have some way to prevent someone from speaking their mind. It's just a reminder that none of the rest of us HAVE to listen, or to encourage certain behaviors by responding to them. Bob M. On Sep 23, 8:53 pm, Timberwoof <timberwoof.s...@infernosoft.com> wrote: > It's not censorship. The person being shunned is not prohibited from > posting. Merely (most of) the rest of the community decides to not > listen. I've seen this applied in other newsgroups, especially to > hysterical one-issue posters who thrive on attention. You don't have to > participate in the shunning, but at the risk of ending up as one who > contributes to the reasons for it. Good post. But you forgot to mention the most important thing: shunning works. :A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he has :kicked a well respected man while he was down. Since I try to avoid most worthless pissing contests, I honestly have no clue who you are talking about. Is it me? Cogito Ergo Spam - I think therefore I ham As an alleged adult, I tend to ignore the nut jobs without prompting. That said, sometimes they are fun. If the Sheriff pulls a Jesus I will taunt him a second time. SignatureStupendous Man, Defender of Freedom, Advocate of Liberty > As an alleged adult, I tend to ignore the nut jobs without prompting. > That said, sometimes they are fun. If the Sheriff pulls a Jesus I will > taunt him a second time. Nice!! :) SNIP SO it's either P or me? sh.t that's an easy one... p.s. P don't ride he's a faker. -- Keith >SNIP > >SO it's either P or me? sh.t that's an easy one... >p.s. P don't ride he's a faker. I thought he was talking about Henry! <g> > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to > put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. Haven't been reading Reeky lately, but I assume we are talking Hank v. TTT? SignatureAndrew 00 Daytona 00 Speed Triple 71 Kawi H1 05 Squiddo >> Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to >> put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > >Haven't been reading Reeky lately, but I assume we are talking Hank v. TTT? Thanks for the chuckle, Andrew. Robert >Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put >it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >[1] further explanation should not be necessary. >[2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. Sheeee-it! You - with who you associate with and your history of cross-posting - having the nerve to come here and tell *us* how to deal with someone who's "stepped over the line"? You gotta be f.cking kidding. > Sheeee-it! You - with who you associate with and your history of > cross-posting - having the nerve to come here and tell *us* how to > deal with someone who's "stepped over the line"? Based on available evidence, SOMEONE has to provide functioning neurons and show you guys how to use them.... >> Sheeee-it! You - with who you associate with and your history of >> cross-posting - having the nerve to come here and tell *us* how to >> deal with someone who's "stepped over the line"? > >Based on available evidence, SOMEONE has to provide functioning >neurons and show you guys how to use them.... And, as if on cue, the huge millstone around the neck of Bryan's case steps forward... >>> Sheeee-it! You - with who you associate with and your history of >>> cross-posting - having the nerve to come here and tell *us* how to [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > case > steps forward... You hear that Bryan? Now I'm a millstone. Last time I got touring with you through Utah if thats the kind of rep actual riding gets me....we can't have anyone around here actually riding...lets all post spam, racist crap, whine like Henry about nonsense or diss some guys who don't ride out of their subdivision. Asphalt started on Sept 21 you street riding specialists..... http://eclipse.host-care.com/~teamterr/hpr/images/9-21_03_DL-overview-web.jpg >>> Sheeee-it! You - with who you associate with and your history of >>> cross-posting - having the nerve to come here and tell *us* how to [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >And, as if on cue, the huge millstone around the neck of Bryan's case >steps forward... You know I have met Bryan and ridden with him on a couple of occasions and I like the guy. He is great company on the road and a fun guy to ride with. All of that said my feelings about cross posting are on record and having Troy The Welsher offer up his support really isn't helping his cause much. -- See Ya On The Road 2000 Yamaha Venture Millennium 2004 HD Road King Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away. > On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 21:14:14 -0600, "TroytheTroll" > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > And, as if on cue, the huge millstone around the neck of Bryan's case > steps forward... Since when am I responsible for what Troy posts? > >Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to put > >it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > > - Show quoted text - If you haven't noticed, I haven't crossposted in quite a while, just to keep you happy. Apparently that's not working. Who I associate with? You mean Calgary, Thumper, Turby, Mark O, Chuck R, Sleazy and Troy. Regardless of their feelings toward me I am glad to have met an rode with each and everyone of them. And I didn't "tell" anyone what to do. I made a suggestion, that is all. > There are relapses, but for the most part the pledge has been kept. Hey, there is NO comparison between Filbert and Milligan. Filbert sea- gulled AMS since 2000 with his "lay 'er down" bullshit. Filbert is obsessed with exacting revenge upon on the "church" of Scientology, while Milligan is just an smart aleck most of the time. > A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he has > kicked a well respected man while he was down. Get real. Milligan gave Thumper a well-deserved scolding over his gambling obsession. > Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? Hey, I do ignore his trolls 98% of the time, but he hit the nail on the head this time. > we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. Hey, whatever happened to your private "Actual Riders" newgroup? Couldn't you and Paul arrange to hook up using that group? > A poster here in reeky crossed the line of acceptable behavior, he > has > kicked a well respected man while he was down. [1] WHAT!!! In between all the spam, off topic nonsense and Henry not getting laid anymore ( thereby returning with HIS nonsense to contribute to the general noise level) , I missed a good "kicking a man while he whined alot" fest? > Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] > > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. Good idea. > Over in AMS there was/is a poster that was/is considered to be a bit, to > put it politely, "whacked". [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > [1] further explanation should not be necessary. > [2] we can get back to our internal flame wars amongst real riders. I haven't paid any attention to him in about 3 months, maybe a bit more. Why should I anyway? Nasty, mean-spirited, and he doesn't ride. Case closed, IMO. > Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] Well...yes and no. I'll continue as I've already been doing -- ignoring his wacked-out posts but not necessarily the sane ones, just by way of positive reinforcement. In other words, ignore the posts, not the poster. Signaturesjs >Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] I plonked that anus a long time ago. >>Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] > >I plonked that anus a long time ago. f.ck off, litte pussy bitch. plonk your own damn self, a.shole. SignatureClick here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm >>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] >> [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > plonk your own damn self, a.shole. I've heard it said that foul language is the last resort of a feeble mind ... is it true what they say about you , that you don't actually , like , well , you know , ride ? SignatureSnag '90 Ultra "Strider" I've put more miles on this bike in eighteem months than I did my '71 T500 in seven years ... >>>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I've heard it said that foul language is the last resort of a feeble mind I've heard it said that feeble minds like to repeat little mantras and platitudes that 'they've heard said'. >... is it true what they say about you , that you don't actually , like , >well , you know , ride ? Is it true that you don't actually, like , have any business sticking your overly large nose into my business ? SignatureClick here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!! www.theanimalrescuesite.com/ Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me 'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.' 'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.' HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/ Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm > On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:34:07 -0500, "Terry Coombs" > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > I've heard it said that feeble minds like to repeat little > mantras and platitudes that 'they've heard said'. and bad programmers get pissy when you call them on what they say. > >... is it true what they say about you , that you don't actually , like , > >well , you know , ride ? > > Is it true that you don't actually, like , have any business > sticking your overly large nose into my business ? It's free country. Don't like it? Tough sh.t tinker belle, why don't you do something about it? Hunh punk...do you feel lucky? You aren't worth plonking...why I typed this is beyond me except that maybe I just thought it polite to point out what a obnoxious onager you are. -- Keith > >>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > ... is it true what they say about you , that you don't actually , like , > well , you know , ride ? Never heard such a load of sh.t in my life. I was always told that foul mouths just mean you are so pissed that words escape them...such as when describing that c.nt "P". I'm at a loss to effectively describe a non-riding loser like him in a manner appropriate for such an overblown cockbiting bitch. -- Keith Put 17,000 on my Titan in less than 3 years...then sh.t the top end, who said speed doesn't kill? >>>>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] >> [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > describe a non-riding loser like him in a manner appropriate for such > an overblown cockbiting bitch. -- Keith Put 17,000 on my Titan in less than 3 years...then sh.t the top end, who said speed doesn't kill? Outta curiosity , how fast have you had yours ? Da book said that it topped out at 110-120 , but I had mine up to 130+ one night coming up the San Diego Freeway . Tucked hard into the tank , I wuz !! And I'm not above issuing an expletive or two myself , I just wanted to tweak the non-ridin' pussybitch's nose a bit . sh.t , we got Nathan W. Collier over at RMH , I'd trade him for .p any day . At least .p can be funny from time to time . Gnat is just plain pathetic vitriol . Care for some of this popcorn ? I made plenty ... SignatureSnag '90 Ultra "Strider" '39 WLDD "Popcycle" Buncha cars and a truck > >>>>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > topped out at 110-120 , but I had mine up to 130+ one night coming up the > San Diego Freeway . heh, if that odo is less than 3% optomistic my real name is John Holmes. ;^) Anyway like the nice italian boy in Gumball Rallye said...if it's in the mirror it no longer matters. I'm that way sometimes with teh speedometer. >Tucked hard into the tank , I wuz !! > And I'm not above issuing an expletive or two myself , I just wanted to > tweak the non-ridin' pussybitch's nose a bit . sh.t , we got Nathan W. > Collier over at RMH , I'd trade him for .p any day . At least .p can be > funny from time to time . Gnat is just plain pathetic vitriol . > Care for some of this popcorn ? I made plenty ... heh, you could be right. Oh thanks for the popcorn...don't ask about getting parts for DR370's I might start copping a HUAC attitude. grr...why did I buy a 2 year only dog...grrr, grumble...oh yeah it runs. -- Keith >>>>>>> Will you take the pledge to ignore the pissant non-rider? [2] >> [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > grr...why did I buy a 2 year only dog...grrr, grumble...oh yeah it > runs. Heh , I got SOHC CB750's in the back yard . Well , one CB and a coupla partly-to-mostly disassembled parts bikes . It'd run if I gave it a little attention , but we got two that run , and I'm the only one that rides ... Helluva difference between a Ninja (the baby one , EX 250) and a 700+ pound touring bike ! SignatureSnag '90 Ultra "Strider" '39 WLDD "Popcycle" Buncha cars and a truck SNIP > Helluva difference between a Ninja (the baby one , EX 250) and a 700+ pound > touring bike ! lol, tell me about it my first two were a Titan and a Jawa Trail 90. BIG difference. Bigger difference than between a LS650 and a GL1000 (current ride) I've done distance on the Titan and the GL1000 and felt little difference. Not even the annoying buzz many reported on teh Titan...well I didn't find it annoying anywho. -- Keith >sh.t , we got Nathan W. >Collier over at RMH , I'd trade him for .p any day . At least .p can be >funny from time to time . Gnat is just plain pathetic vitriol . Yeah, .p is opinionated and cutting in his remarks but, really, that can be applied to a lot of people here. I don't follow much of the arguments he gets involved in, but it appears to me that: 1. They're usually on political subjects 2. He does provide facts to back up his points (and they're often ones that wouldn't otherwise be heard in this overwhelmingly liberal setting) As for him being a former (but not current) motorcyclist... Well, if some people want to deluge this *international*, *motorcycle* newsgroup with American political debates, I don't see why being a currently-riding motorcyclist is suddenly so crucial. Quite honestly, we don't exactly have high standards here anyway. There's way worse actors here than .p. But that's just my opinion. > Care for some of this popcorn ? I made plenty ... Battling a bout of the flu right now. I better make a bag of my own. ;) |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2009 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.