From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs 458
lbs.
Just call me old-fashioned, but I always assumed that a larger bike weighs
more ...
What did I miss?
. - 28 Sep 2008 03:41 GMT
> From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs 458
> lbs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What did I miss?
379 pounds seems like a more correct dry weight for the 650.
When the manufacturers weigh their creations, they are *very* dry, no
fluids, no battery.
Steve L - 28 Sep 2008 04:03 GMT
> From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs
> 458 lbs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What did I miss?
Some one stole the toolkit out of the 1K? nah.. seriously, how come?
Last good Zuki was the Water Buffalo, that's my story and I'm stickin
with it.
Andrew - 28 Sep 2008 04:57 GMT
>> From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs 458
>> lbs.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Last good Zuki was the Water Buffalo, that's my story and I'm stickin with
> it.
Yeah Gixxers suck! :-)

Signature
Andrew
00 Daytona
00 Speed Triple
71 Kawi H1
05 Squiddo
Andrzej Rosa - 28 Sep 2008 08:51 GMT
Dnia 2008-09-28 Andrew napisał(a):
>> Some one stole the toolkit out of the 1K? nah.. seriously, how come?
>>
>> Last good Zuki was the Water Buffalo, that's my story and I'm stickin with
>> it.
>
> Yeah Gixxers suck! :-)
I hope you are fast. I wouldn't want to catch you before I cool down a
bit! ;-)

Signature
Andrzej Rosa
ottguit@hotmail.com - 28 Sep 2008 07:49 GMT
> From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs 458
> lbs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What did I miss?
It's a mistake.
bg
CigarSki - 28 Sep 2008 13:50 GMT
> From the Suzuki website, the 650 weighs 479 lbs. but the 1000 weighs 458
> lbs.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> What did I miss?
It looks like the weight specs for the three variations of the Strom have
been written differently.
The 1K is listed as having a "Dry Weight" of 208 kg (458 lbs).
The .65K is listed as having a "Curb Weight" 217 kg (479 lbs).
The .65K ABS is listed as having a "Curb Weight" 220 kg (485 lbs).
The "Curb Weight" Likely includes the battery, oil and fuel.
The "Curb Weight" of the 1K is more like 525 lbs (239 kg).
Wayne aka "CigarSki"
2006 DL1000 V-Strom
Doug Payne - 28 Sep 2008 14:58 GMT
It doesn't. The DL1000 is about 30 lbs heavier than the DL650. At lot of
that is the second exhaust. You obviously didn't read carefully enough
to note that in one case the Web site quoted curb weight whereas in the
other cases it was dry weight.
Steve L - 28 Sep 2008 17:52 GMT
> It doesn't. The DL1000 is about 30 lbs heavier than the DL650. At
> lot of that is the second exhaust. You obviously didn't read
> carefully enough to note that in one case the Web site quoted curb
> weight whereas in the other cases it was dry weight.
Silly you to expect any consistency.
Doug Payne - 29 Sep 2008 13:15 GMT
>> It doesn't. The DL1000 is about 30 lbs heavier than the DL650. At
>> lot of that is the second exhaust. You obviously didn't read
>> carefully enough to note that in one case the Web site quoted curb
>> weight whereas in the other cases it was dry weight.
>
> Silly you to expect any consistency.
Who said I expected anything?
adventuremyk - 29 Sep 2008 13:49 GMT
>It doesn't. The DL1000 is about 30 lbs heavier than the DL650. At lot of
>that is the second exhaust. You obviously didn't read carefully enough
>to note that in one case the Web site quoted curb weight whereas in the
>other cases it was dry weight.
Most of what I recall is it's right at 32-35lbs heavier and all that
weight is up high. There are reasons so many want the 1000 to get
down the freeway to the twisty sections then want the 650 through
those twisties. Frankly, even 2-up with full packs I never needed the
literbike. I'll have more fun with the lighter, more agile Strom. :)
Prior to buying the 650 I have now I was working with a motorcycle
apparell company and talked to a good 120+ V-Strom riders. I asked
them all some pretty similar questions and what I found was very
consistent:
Virtually 95% of those with the 650 were very happy. About 65% of
those with the 1000 were happy.
There were at least 12 who went from the 1000 to the 650 and were much
happier, there were 0 (ZERO) that went from the 650 to the 1000.
Those that were happiest on the 1000 mostly used it for long-distance
2-up touring or similiar riding to that of a Goldwing. A few used it
for commuting.
Those who favored the 650 lived in more winding road area's, did some
mild trail and forest roading, also did the sport touring and a lot of
commuting.
What got me was the consistency of the reasons people used and the
very similar numbers of times that virtually the same phrases were
used.
Using this info I knew what I wanted to look for and I was sold within
the first 5 minutes I was on the bike. I have yet to ever ride the
1000, but if something happened to my '07 650 I'd go out and replace
it with exactly the same thing.
Tuesday Blimpie - 29 Sep 2008 16:01 GMT
> Virtually 95% of those with the 650 were very happy. About 65% of
> those with the 1000 were happy.
I like a bike the size of the VStrom 650, but a little lighter, with
the displacement of the VStrom 1000, but a little more powerful.