Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Motorcycles / December 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

It's not just GM/Ford/Chrysler

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
BryanUT - 20 Nov 2008 00:54 GMT
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1

Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
eggs and meat?
Twibil - 20 Nov 2008 01:04 GMT
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

Been doing it for years. Works fine (and keeps bugs out of the garden
as well) so long as the neighborhood dogs and/or coyotes can't get
into your yard.

We lost a couple of geese to a bobcat as well, but that's what you get
for living out in the sagebrush.
S'mee - 20 Nov 2008 01:25 GMT
> >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> We lost a couple of geese to a bobcat as well, but that's what you get
> for living out in the sagebrush.

That's why we have working dogs. A dog for each job...security,
herding etc. Haven't found a breed that brews beer yet but I'm looking
for one.
--
Keith
BryanUT - 20 Nov 2008 01:35 GMT
> > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> --
> Keith

I live in 1940s suburbia, small single story brick homes. 1/4 acre
lots. All fenced. And I have 4 dogs [1]. What could go wrong?  Besides
code violations?

[1] If by work you mean eating, sleeping and barking at the mail man.
Twibil - 20 Nov 2008 01:40 GMT
> I live in 1940s suburbia, small single story brick homes. 1/4 acre
> lots. All fenced. And I have 4 dogs [1]. What could go wrong?  Besides
> code violations?

Well, the dogs *could* eat the chickens.

They do that, you know.
S'mee - 20 Nov 2008 02:52 GMT
> > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> lots. All fenced. And I have 4 dogs [1]. What could go wrong?  Besides
> code violations?

I just have a double lot, detached garage (two cars OR 4+motorcycles)
full basement huge deck out front.

> [1] If by work you mean eating, sleeping and barking at the mail man.

No I mean REAL work like herding, property protection, personal
protection, security, mental hygiene, venison bone disposal etc.
--
Keith
BiffB - 20 Nov 2008 02:54 GMT
>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>>>> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> [1] If by work you mean eating, sleeping and barking at the mail man.
Raccoons.
Or whatever the NZ equivalent of raccoons is.
Twibil - 20 Nov 2008 01:37 GMT
> > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> That's why we have working dogs.

So do we. But a startled bobcat can cover the fifty yards to our fence
faster than a dog* can cover the same distance.

*Yes, this includes our greyhounds. (Whippets are even quicker over
short sprints, but you don't want one closing with a bobcat...)
S'mee - 20 Nov 2008 02:57 GMT
> > > >http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> So do we. But a startled bobcat can cover the fifty yards to our fence
> faster than a dog* can cover the same distance.

True, but the bobcat wouldn't even consider getting on in our yard.
We're more likely to see cougar or coyote. Though neither have come to
our part of town in a while. Grizzly and black bear are possible
though unlikely. BUT if any of the above were stupid enough...I've one
dog that could deal with the issue no problem. The grizzly he'd run
off, the rest die if they get stupid. I linked his pictures some time
back...want to see a refresher?

> *Yes, this includes our greyhounds. (Whippets are even quicker over
> short sprints, but you don't want one closing with a bobcat...)

I dunno I've seen greyhounds run down a healthy coyote. Not something
I reccomend watching. Think 5 little girls fighting over a barbi and
each has a limb or the head. eww

--
Keith
Twibil - 20 Nov 2008 03:42 GMT
> I dunno I've seen greyhounds run down a healthy coyote. Not something
> I reccomend watching. Think 5 little girls fighting over a barbi and
> each has a limb or the head. eww

Yeah, people make the mistake of thinking those big skinny dogs must
be wimps, forgetting that they were bred to run down and kill semi-big
game such as deer and antelope; and that they've lost neither the
skills nor the instincts. At 80 pounds, my male Greyhound used to beat
the crap out of our neighbor's 110 pound German Sheperd "Sparky"
whenever he'd come wandering into our yard. Sparky, being so inbred
that he was *born* with displasia, was never bright enough to learn to
stay in his own territory.

Good Greyhound story: One day I was hiking out in the canyon behind
our home, with our 3 greyhounds ranging about 50 yards ahead of me;
looking for trouble. A cotton-tail suddenly broke cover and headed up
the side of a hogback ridge, with the dogs about 40 yards behind;
stretched out in line abreast, and closing fast.

The cotton-tail beat the dogs to the ridge-line by about twenty yards,
soared over it, pivoted hard left into a bush, and froze.

The dogs -who couldn't see where the rabbit had gone from their
viewpoint- cleared the ridge still under hard acceleration and covered
about another 50 yards in a straight line before it occurred to them
that there was no longer any visible prey out in front of them.....and
slowed to a confused halt; casting about unsuccessfully to see where
he'd gone.

Meanwhile, Brer Rabbit slipped off into the dense brush; no doubt
thinking "Dumb-a.s dogs!" to himself.

So if you've ever wondered why it is that Brer Rabbit hasn't been
hunted to extinction by Brer Coyote, now you know: Brer Rabbit isn't
totally brainless.
S'mee - 20 Nov 2008 05:10 GMT
SNIP

> Meanwhile, Brer Rabbit slipped off into the dense brush; no doubt
> thinking "Dumb-a.s dogs!" to himself.

lol, I think you'd agree that if they'd been trained to course hare it
wouldn't have come out that way. Though I suppose I could be wrong...I
don't know how bright the dogs were. ;^)

> So if you've ever wondered why it is that Brer Rabbit hasn't been
> hunted to extinction by Brer Coyote, now you know: Brer Rabbit isn't
> totally brainless.

Naw Bre'r Rabbit isn't that smart he just has the one redeeming
personality trait that good officers have. He's cunning!
--
Keith
Jujitsu Lizard - 20 Nov 2008 02:31 GMT
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

Thanks for the link.  The article is sobering.

Since I'm a control systems guy from way back, I find a couple of the
ramifications ugly.

First, economic output seems unstable once you get outside of a normal
range.  Once you get outside of a normal range and people begin to fear for
their futures, they cut back on spending.  This causes more job losses,
causing more people to fear for their futures, causing even less spending,
causing even more job losses, etc.  That spiral isn't cool.

Second, there are some really large time delays and possibly non-linear
elements in the system.  All those vehicles on the dock ... even when demand
increases, it will be a while before that causes a production increase.

The chicken idea looks good.  Myself, I'm going to bury Spam, Twinkies, and
gold coins at random locations in Michigan.  They have an unlimited shelf
life.

The Lizard
MikeWhy - 20 Nov 2008 07:36 GMT
> The chicken idea looks good.  Myself, I'm going to bury Spam, Twinkies,
> and gold coins at random locations in Michigan.  They have an unlimited
> shelf life.

5.56 NATO is better currency. You can spend it, or you can barter it. Either
way, I'll have your spam.

Twinkies?
Twibil - 20 Nov 2008 07:48 GMT
> > The chicken idea looks good.  Myself, I'm going to bury Spam, Twinkies,
> > and gold coins at random locations in Michigan.  They have an unlimited
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Twinkies?

Well, I don't *think* he was being personal...
Jujitsu Lizard - 20 Nov 2008 14:34 GMT
>> The chicken idea looks good.  Myself, I'm going to bury Spam, Twinkies,
>> and gold coins at random locations in Michigan.  They have an unlimited
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Twinkies?

I'm not sure which side of which ocean you're on.  I'm referring to Hostess
Twinkies--those little cake snacks.

They can also advise one in difficult situations (kind of an AI device),
see:

http://www.twinkiesproject.com/turing.html

Although they fail the Turing test, I feel that the methods employed were
flawed.

The Lizard
tomorrow@erols.com - 20 Nov 2008 04:43 GMT
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

I don't know.   Will you be flying to Washington to seek low interest
federal loans for your capitalization needs?  (If so, one piece of
advice: fly commercial, leave your private jet at home!)

;-)
Jujitsu Lizard - 20 Nov 2008 05:49 GMT
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>;-)

One of the funny things about today's (or technically, yesterday's)
discourse was that there was speculation that GM's company policy had them
flying private jets for safety reasons.

I believe the stats say that your typical Southwest or Northwest commercial
flight is safer than a small jet flight.  I don't understand the phrase
"safety" in that context.  Except for Air Force One, commercial flights are
as safe as it gets.  I think.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/1206/p02s02-usgn.html

The Lizard
Chuck Rhode - 20 Nov 2008 16:11 GMT
> One of the funny things about today's (or technically, yesterday's)
> discourse was that there was speculation that GM's company policy
> had them flying private jets for safety reasons.

> I believe the stats say that your typical Southwest or Northwest
> commercial flight is safer than a small jet flight.  I don't
> understand the phrase "safety" in that context.

It may have something to do with unreasonable search and seizure.  I
imagine these folks carry company proprietary info on their persons.

It could mean, OTOH, that they are at less risk of contracting
communicable diseases than when boarding a commercial flight.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 30° — Wind NNW 21 mph

J. Clarke - 20 Nov 2008 17:18 GMT
>> One of the funny things about today's (or technically, yesterday's)
>> discourse was that there was speculation that GM's company policy
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> It could mean, OTOH, that they are at less risk of contracting
> communicable diseases than when boarding a commercial flight.

Every year 400 or so executives are kidnapped in the US (and a lot
more than that worldwide).  Travelling on a commercial airliner means
pretty much abandoning security for part of the trip, and their
security team may arrive at the destination without their weapons
(thanks to their being pilfered from checked baggage by the TSA).

Not an issue on a private flight.

Then there's the whole issue of efficient use of time.  No hour
standing in line going through security, no changing planes in
Atlanta, etc.

And there's a control issue--no having some stranger rummage through
your baggage, no arriving with just the clothes on your back, etc.

In any case, if you run the numbers comparing first class tickets for
several people with operating costs for a bizjet I think you'll find
that if there are several people travelling (like exec, secretary,
corporate counsel, and security team) it breaks even pretty fast.

Signature

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Chuck Rhode - 20 Nov 2008 16:16 GMT
> Except for Air Force One, commercial flights are as safe as it gets.
> I think.

I should mention that Sheboygan County has no commercial air passenger
service.  However, the airport does a land-office business in private
service for a number of big companies headquartered here.  It has been
expanding (in runway length and hangar capacity), which is quite a
stunt for airports in general.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 30° — Wind NNW 21 mph

[none] - 20 Nov 2008 12:13 GMT
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> ;-)

Fly private planes. Ask for a hand out. Proclaim that the corporate
jets are non-negotiable. Have the vote on free money canceled and get
sent packing. With attitudes like that they deserve to fail.
tomorrow@erols.com - 20 Nov 2008 15:29 GMT
> tomor...@erols.com wrote:
> >>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> jets are non-negotiable. Have the vote on free money canceled and get
> sent packing. With attitudes like that they deserve to fail.

Other than the "free money" part, you are spot on.   The funny thing
is that all the people excoriating them are as guilty of high flying
excesses (without producing anything of value) as they are.  Kathy
Lee, on this morning's talks shows, for one.  Never saw anything
funnier than her whiny a.s complaints that those auto executives just
get paid WAY too much money!
TOG@Toil - 20 Nov 2008 10:22 GMT
> http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/business/economy/19ports.html?_r=1
>
> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

We have three. We bought one of these:

http://www.omlet.co.uk/products_services/products_services.php?view=Chickens

Genius contraption. It is utterly fox-proof, and God knows the buggers
have tried. I dunno if there's an equivalent product in the US. The
company has been written up in the main papers here, because they're
making *millions*.

One of our chooks is too old to lay now, but we keep her anyway, as
she rules the roost and keeps the other two in order. We get an egg
per day per bird, except sometimes in the depths of winter.

They're very therapeutic, somehow. They're also as stupid as it's
possible to be without actually stopping breathing. Great  fun.

All the local cats have tried their luck because, well, they know what
chicken is, and these things, ipso facto, smell of.... well, chicken.
They have all discovered that the chooks have very sharp beaks and
work together. It's always amusing when there's a new cat in town, and
it hasn't had the word yet, and comes into the garden to have a go at
a ready-made chicken dinner.
Chuck Rhode - 20 Nov 2008 16:50 GMT
> http://www.omlet.co.uk/products_services/products_services.php?view=Chickens

> Genius contraption. It is utterly fox-proof, and God knows the
> buggers have tried. ... It's always amusing when there's a new cat
> in town, and it hasn't had the word yet, and comes into the garden
> to have a go at a ready-made chicken dinner.

I can readily appreciate that the Eglu is fox-proof.  It seems to me
that the hens would thereby be prevented from harassing wayward cats.

o Do you let the chickens out at times?  

o Don't you have any municipal-code authorities on the prowl ... or
meddlesome neighbors to maintain community standards?

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 30° — Wind NNW 21 mph

The Older Gentleman - 20 Nov 2008 19:11 GMT
> o Do you let the chickens out at times?  

Yes

> o Don't you have any municipal-code authorities on the prowl ... or
> meddlesome neighbors to maintain community standards?

It's not illegal

Signature

BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XTZ660 Tenere Honda CB400F CB250N SH50
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
"What you're proposing to do will involve a lot of time
and hassle for no tangible benefit."

Chuck Rhode - 21 Nov 2008 00:54 GMT
> It's not illegal

<splutter>Well ... what about the possibility of poultry viruses
crossing the species barrier?</splutter>

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 23° — Wind NNW 17 mph — Sky overcast.

Susan (CobbersMom) - 20 Nov 2008 12:21 GMT
"BryanUT" <> wrote in message > Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in
the backyard.  We do pretty> well with the garden, how hard can it be to
raise a few chickens for> eggs and meat?

Most people get a dog or cat for their kids, I got the each of the girls a
chicken when they were little.  The egg part was good (from the female,
Chickadee) but the male (Rooster Cogburn) crowed every morning before the
sun came up.  Got a couple more chickens after that but never got around to
culling them for meat.  A couple of them actually liked being held and
petted.  They made a soft cooing sound.
We lived outside of Green Bay, Wisconsin at the time and had a dog (lab,
doberman, something mix) who would run out and round them up into the barn
at night.  He tried that with the horses too but ended up getting chased by
them.
Sue
Minocqua, WI
Yamaha '00 VStar 650
             '04 TW200 (mud = fun)
Kawasaki '95 Vulcan 1500  V#15937
Feminine Protection:
Light days - Glock 27 w/ Crimson Trace
Heavy days - Ruger Redhawk .44 mag
TOG@Toil - 20 Nov 2008 12:56 GMT
On 20 Nov, 12:21, "Susan \(CobbersMom\)" <dittohead1...@yahoo.com>
wrote:

> Rooster Cogburn

*Splendid* name for a cockerel
Susan (CobbersMom) - 20 Nov 2008 14:06 GMT
"TOG@Toil" <> wrote in message > *Splendid* name for a cockerel

Daughter was about 8 years old and I don't recall any of us being a John
Wayne fan but somehow she came up with it.  Go figure, but yes, it was a
good name.  Hated him tho...
He was a small rooster and the girls would chase him until he'd turn on them
and chase back.
Sue
Minocqua, WI
Yamaha '00 VStar 650
             '04 TW200 (mud = fun)
Kawasaki '95 Vulcan 1500  V#15937
Feminine Protection:
Light days - Glock 27 w/ Crimson Trace
Heavy days - Ruger Redhawk .44 mag
BrianNZ - 20 Nov 2008 19:39 GMT
> "TOG@Toil" <> wrote in message > *Splendid* name for a cockerel
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> Light days - Glock 27 w/ Crimson Trace
> Heavy days - Ruger Redhawk .44 mag

    Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
    Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip. I
shot him in it.
    Quincy: In the lip? What was you aiming at?
    Rooster: His upper lip.
The Older Gentleman - 20 Nov 2008 19:57 GMT
>      Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
>      Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip. I
> shot him in it.
>      Quincy: In the lip? What was you aiming at?
>      Rooster: His upper lip.

One of my *favourite* westerns. Along with Cat Ballou.

Signature

BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XTZ660 Tenere Honda CB400F CB250N SH50
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
"What you're proposing to do will involve a lot of time
and hassle for no tangible benefit."

J. Clarke - 20 Nov 2008 20:12 GMT
>>      Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
>>      Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> One of my *favourite* westerns. Along with Cat Ballou.

Amen.  "Rat writ writ for a rat" still cracks me up every time.

Signature

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

BrianNZ - 20 Nov 2008 20:13 GMT
>>      Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
>>      Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip. I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> One of my *favourite* westerns. Along with Cat Ballou.

Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
Western for me has to be Blazing Saddles.
Doug Payne - 20 Nov 2008 20:51 GMT
> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
> Western for me has to be Blazing Saddles.

Come on, boys! The way you're lollygaggin' around here with them picks
and them shovels, you'd think it was a hunnert'n twenty degrees. Can't
be more than a hunnert'n fourteen.
.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com - 20 Nov 2008 21:49 GMT
>> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
>> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>and them shovels, you'd think it was a hunnert'n twenty degrees. Can't
>be more than a hunnert'n fourteen.

( visions of Brobama's Inaugural dancing in my head )

    Wait a minute while I whip this out ....

Signature

Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

Chuck Rhode - 21 Nov 2008 01:05 GMT
"Number 6?" I'm afraid I'm not familiar with that one....

Well, that's where we go a-ridin' into town, a whompin' and a whalin'
on every livin' thing that moves. Except the women folks, of course.

You spare the women?

NAW. We rape the sh.t out of them at the Number 6 Dance later on.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 23° — Wind NNW 17 mph — Sky overcast.

The Older Gentleman - 20 Nov 2008 22:08 GMT
> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
> Western for me has to be Blazing Saddles.

I never found it funny. Guess it must be just me.

Signature

BMW K1100LT Ducati 750SS Yamaha XTZ660 Tenere Honda CB400F CB250N SH50
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com
"What you're proposing to do will involve a lot of time
and hassle for no tangible benefit."

BrianNZ - 20 Nov 2008 23:14 GMT
>> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
>> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
>> Western for me has to be Blazing Saddles.
>
> I never found it funny. Guess it must be just me.

For me there is a huge difference between American and English humor.
The poms will just do/say stupid stuff with a straight face, where the
yanks chuck in more slapstick and push the joke too far until it's
almost painful, rather than funny.
 But, that could be just me too.

I used to stay up late and listen to "This is the
BBC.....presenting...The Goon Show". TV had the likes of Benny Hill,
Morcombe and Wise,Porridge,The Two Ronnies, Dave Allen at large with
Kenny Everret, Red dwarf,Black Books coming along later.

Can't remember the name of the show, but Archie Bunker and his wife
Eduth?...harsh but funny...Bill Cosby's a funny man, Cheers, a couple of
the sit-com type comedies were a copy of earlier pommie series.
Sienfield makes my skin crawl.

I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)
Twibil - 21 Nov 2008 01:12 GMT
> For me there is a huge difference between American and English humor.
> The poms will just do/say stupid stuff with a straight face, where the
> yanks chuck in more slapstick and push the joke too far until it's
> almost painful, rather than funny.

Two words: Benny Hill.
.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com - 21 Nov 2008 02:13 GMT
>>> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
>>> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>Can't remember the name of the show, but Archie Bunker and his wife
>Eduth?...harsh but funny...

    That's Edith, meathead.

>Bill Cosby's a funny man, Cheers, a couple of
>the sit-com type comedies were a copy of earlier pommie series.
>Sienfield makes my skin crawl.
>
>I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)

Signature

Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

BrianNZ - 21 Nov 2008 03:15 GMT
>>>> Back when movies didn't just rely on special effects.
>>>> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>     That's Edith, meathead.

Glad you figured that one out all by yourself, you'll make pet detective
one day.

If you look, 'i' & 'u' are next to each other and maybe you could have
figured out it was a typo......?

>> Bill Cosby's a funny man, Cheers, a couple of
>> the sit-com type comedies were a copy of earlier pommie series.
>> Sienfield makes my skin crawl.
>>
>> I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)
.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com - 21 Nov 2008 03:35 GMT
>>> Can't remember the name of the show, but Archie Bunker and his wife
>>> Eduth?...harsh but funny...
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>Glad you figured that one out all by yourself, you'll make pet detective
>one day.

    Just call me Ace.

>If you look, 'i' & 'u' are next to each other and maybe you could have
>figured out it was a typo......?

    And if you remembered the show, you should recall that
'meathead' was Archie's favorite tag line, as well as his 'pet name'
for his son-in-law :-)

>>> Bill Cosby's a funny man, Cheers, a couple of
>>> the sit-com type comedies were a copy of earlier pommie series.
>>> Sienfield makes my skin crawl.
>>>
>>> I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)

    The one with the penguin on it ?


Signature

Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

Outback Jon - 21 Nov 2008 03:55 GMT
>>>> I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)
>
>     The one with the penguin on it ?
>  

No, the penguin exploded.

I'm tired of all this sex on the telly.

I mean, I keep falling off.

Signature

"Outback" Jon  -  KC2BNE
outback_jon@ver.no.sp.am.izon.net
AMD Opteron 165 (@2.5) and 6.1 GHz of other AMD power...
http://folding.stanford.edu - got folding?  Team 53560

2006 ZG1000A Concours "Blueline" COG# 7385 CDA# 0157

Chuck Rhode - 21 Nov 2008 04:28 GMT
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:35:00 -0500, .p.jm wrote:

>>>> I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)

> The one with the penguin on it ?

Mark Olson made me post this:

o "The Death of Mary, Queen of Scots." _Monty Python's Flying
Circus_. BBC. 24 Nov. 1970. 21 Sept. 2007
<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k1ccguXiws&mode=related&search=>.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 19° — Wind NNW 17 mph

S'mee - 21 Nov 2008 05:39 GMT
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:35:00 -0500, .p.jm wrote:
> >>>> I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> o "The Death of Mary, Queen of Scots." _Monty Python's Flying

The Death of John Denver was funnier...

--
Keith
.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com - 21 Nov 2008 04:35 GMT
>I think I've spent too much time in front of the telly......  :)

    How long is your shift as a remote control, anyway ?

Signature

Click here every day to feed an animal that needs you today !!!
www.theanimalrescuesite.com/

Paul ( pjm @ pobox . com ) - remove spaces to email me
'Some days, it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.'
'With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine.'
HVAC/R program for Palm PDA's
Free demo online at www.pmilligan.net/palm/
Free 'People finder' program now at www.pmilligan.net/finder.htm

S'mee - 21 Nov 2008 05:37 GMT
> >>      Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
> >>      Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip. I
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Don't think I've seen Cat Ballou (but now it's on my list)....funniest
> Western for me has to be Blazing Saddles.

WHAT IN THE WIDE WIDE WORLD OF SPORTS IS GOING ON HERE? Y'all are
dancing around like a bunch of Kansas city faggots!

or my eldest spawns ringtone (cell phone kept in front pants pocket)

Excuse me while I whip this out...

--
Keith
me no have cell phone, cell phones evil.
Terry Coombs - 20 Nov 2008 22:34 GMT
>>      Quincy: I don't know any Ned Pepper. What's he look like?
>>      Rooster: Short, feisty fella. He's got a messed-up lower lip. I
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> One of my *favourite* westerns. Along with Cat Ballou.

 Dirty Dingus McGee ... howlin' funny .
Signature

Snag
'90 Ultra "Strider"
'39 WLDD "Popcycle"
Buncha cars and a truck

Jujitsu Lizard - 20 Nov 2008 14:39 GMT
> We lived outside of Green Bay, Wisconsin at the time and had a dog (lab,
> doberman, something mix) who would run out and round them up into the barn
> at night.  He tried that with the horses too but ended up getting chased
> by them.

Funny.  I've known horses to bite and kick, but never to chase anything.

Perhaps it is no fun for a horse to chase a biped because it can't run fast
enough and might not run at all.  A dog may be more fun, as it is faster and
more maneuverable.
TOG@Toil - 20 Nov 2008 15:00 GMT
> > We lived outside of Green Bay, Wisconsin at the time and had a dog (lab,
> > doberman, something mix) who would run out and round them up into the barn
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> enough and might not run at all.  A dog may be more fun, as it is faster and
> more maneuverable.

My other half says that when she was at school, the horse in a paddock
adjoining the playing fields used to chase bicycles. And try and shag
them.
S'mee - 20 Nov 2008 16:29 GMT
> > We lived outside of Green Bay, Wisconsin at the time and had a dog (lab,
> > doberman, something mix) who would run out and round them up into the barn
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> enough and might not run at all.  A dog may be more fun, as it is faster and
> more maneuverable.

Good for chickens but couldn't herd a horse? Dumb dog!

 That's why we got ACD's commonly called Heelers. I've got a
red...she's been tested on horses, alpacas haven't tried her on sheep
yet.Keeps kids from fighting and if she doesn't know you
well...Bhudda, the Pope and the Dahli Lama wont be allowed out of the
car.
p.s. yeah she's a red...like most red headed gals she's got an
attitude.
--
Keith
Susan (CobbersMom) - 21 Nov 2008 03:25 GMT
"Jujitsu Lizard" <> wrote in message > Funny.  I've known horses to bite and
kick, but never to chase anything.

> Perhaps it is no fun for a horse to chase a biped because it can't run
> fast enough and might not run at all.  A dog may be more fun, as it is
> faster and more maneuverable.

I think you've got it.  Although the horses had fun running around when I
threw dried horse turds at them, they had more fun playing with the dog.  He
would chase them full length of the pen then they'd all turn and chase the
dog.  However the dog caught on real fast and could stop and turn faster
than them, then get behind them again before they knew it.
Sue
Minocqua, WI
Yamaha '00 VStar 650
             '04 TW200 (mud = fun)
Kawasaki '95 Vulcan 1500  V#15937
Feminine Protection:
Light days - Glock 27 w/ Crimson Trace
Heavy days - Ruger Redhawk .44 mag
Chuck Rhode - 20 Nov 2008 17:21 GMT
> I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

I just dug up a deteriorating sidewalk leading from my back door to
the end of my lot (to make room for apple trees).  I always imagined
it used to lead to the privy.  However, I have cause to doubt this.
The Roto-Router man informs me that the sanitary tile from my house to
the sewer is original from the 1880s, so I suppose indoor plumbing
was, too.  City water didn't start until 1885, though, so there must
have been a cistern someplace.  I have never sought any trace of it.
Perhaps indoor plumbing became practical only after city water was
available, but the tile predates it by a year or two.  I dunno.

Anyway, I'm thinking now that the concrete may have led to a chicken
coop, but my barber assures me that city code has always banned
poultry.  He believes people used to raise doves -- for meat!

My Dad grew up during the Great Depression.  He would never pay money
for chicken when we went out to eat.  In the 1930s everyone raised
chickens in their back yards (in the country and at the edges of small
towns).  Consequently chicken was plentiful -- the next best thing to
free food -- and a monotonous course of fare, too.  It was tainted in
everyone's imagination by its association with hard times.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 30° — Wind NNW 21 mph

Chuck Rhode - 21 Nov 2008 01:11 GMT
> In the 1930s everyone raised chickens in their back yards (in the
> country and at the edges of small towns).  Consequently chicken was
> plentiful -- the next best thing to free food -- and a monotonous
> course of fare, too.  It was tainted in everyone's imagination by
> its association with hard times.

My brother informs me that "everyone raised chickens in *his* back
yard" for *eggs*, and, according to his research, meat of any kind on
the table was a delicacy during the Great Depression, including
chicken.

Signature

.. Be Seeing You,
.. Chuck Rhode, Sheboygan, WI, USA
.. Weather:  http://LacusVeris.com/WX
.. 21° — Wind NNW 14 mph — Sky mostly clear.

S'mee - 21 Nov 2008 05:41 GMT
> > In the 1930s everyone raised chickens in their back yards (in the
> > country and at the edges of small towns).  Consequently chicken was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the table was a delicacy during the Great Depression, including
> chicken.

City boys had it tough I guess.

--
Keith
Mat S - 05 Dec 2008 16:32 GMT
> > In the 1930s everyone raised chickens in their back yards (in the
> > country and at the edges of small towns). Consequently chicken was
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> the table was a delicacy during the Great Depression, including
> chicken.

City boys had it tough I guess.

Well, Keith, maybe in "the days" there was a law for those who kill a
chicken... It was hard times...
And Chuck's brother's back yard mustabeen pretty huge for everybody's
chickens to fit in ;-)
I'm just my usual me - parsing every sentence. Sorry. ;-)
I'd order one on me, but it's not the usual Shirley's place, so - next
time...

MS
Stephen! - 28 Nov 2008 04:07 GMT
BryanUT <nestle12@comcast.net> wrote in news:02180713-d5ed-4bb3-866c-
227f98aaee4d@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com:

> Me?  I'm looking into raising chickens in the backyard.  We do pretty
> well with the garden, how hard can it be to raise a few chickens for
> eggs and meat?

 It's not all it's cracked up to be...  We raised Rhode Island Red's
when I was a yungin.  Although the egs were plentiful and we never needed
to buy chicken from the grocery store, the work is endless and really not
much worth the expense anymore.  Butchering day isn't much fun either.  
Although I did get pretty good at skinning and gutting 'em.  Between my
two brothers and I we could clean up the whole lot of 'em (about 30 a
year) in a matter of a couple hours.  Just gotta make sure you get the
first whack right.  Hitting them a second time with the hatchet can be
difficult.

Signature

RCOS #7
IBA# 11465
http://imagesdesavions.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

BryanUT - 28 Nov 2008 05:56 GMT
> BryanUT <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in news:02180713-d5ed-4bb3-866c-
> 227f98aae...@c22g2000prc.googlegroups.com:
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>   It's not all it's cracked up to be...  

I'm sure you are correct.

>We raised Rhode Island Red's
> when I was a yungin.  Although the egs were plentiful

Yep, that's my sister's experience.

> and we never needed
> to buy chicken from the grocery store, the work is endless and really not
> much worth the expense anymore.

Interesting observation.  "worth the expense"  and yet many preach
"self reliance".

>  Butchering day isn't much fun either.  

No doubt.  But I think Ted Nugent would disagree.

> Although I did get pretty good at skinning and gutting 'em.  

A very good skill.  Share your knowledge.

>Between my
> two brothers and I we could clean up the whole lot of 'em (about 30 a
> year) in a matter of a couple hours.  Just gotta make sure you get the
> first whack right.  Hitting them a second time with the hatchet can be
> difficult.

Hehe,
> --

> RCOS #7
> IBA# 11465http://imagesdesavions.com
> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**
J. Clarke - 28 Nov 2008 11:02 GMT
>> BryanUT <nestl...@comcast.net> wrote in
>> news:02180713-d5ed-4bb3-866c-
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Interesting observation.  "worth the expense"  and yet many preach
> "self reliance".

Many are nuts who will put ludicrous amounts of effort into saving a
penny.  A large perceantage of those (in the US anyway) who preach
"self reliance" are really saying "I'm too poor to actually buy
anything".

>> Butchering day isn't much fun either.
>
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>> IBA# 11465http://imagesdesavions.com
>> ** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**

Signature

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

Stephen! - 29 Nov 2008 08:08 GMT
BryanUT <nestle12@comcast.net> wrote in news:6ebee2fc-5ad3-4c4f-8b08-
ad64f2d7f1d7@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com:

>> to buy chicken from the grocery store, the work is endless and really
>> not much worth the expense anymore.
>
> Interesting observation.  "worth the expense"  and yet many preach
> "self reliance".

 The same folks that will spend several hundred dollars[1] each hunting
season for less than 100 post-processing lbs of deer meat and justify it
by saying, "We gotta eat!"

[1]  License fees, fuel cost, time off from work, wear and tear on the
vehicle, price of processing items, etc etc...  It all counts.  I'm all
for hunting and still have some deer sausage left over from last year's
kill but I ain't about to try to fool myself (or anyone else) and claim
that I saved a bunch of money by killing my own animal.

>> Although I did get pretty good at skinning and gutting 'em. ÿ
>
> A very good skill.  Share your knowledge.

This works for just about any eatin' bird...  Chicken, duck, goose,
pheasent, etc.  You just can't be too beholdin' to the skin.  After
spending literally *days* butchering our birds the first year because we
decided to pluck them all, we quickly lost our desire to salvage the skin
and developed this method:

 Skinning: Use a coat hanger (or baling wire) wrapped just above the
feet to hang it upside down.  Using a *sharp* knife, slice the skin
around the leg right where it turns from feathers to scale.  Slice down
from each of those cuts along the inside of the leg to where the leg
meets the thigh.  Sever the tail.  Grab the bunch of loosened skin in
both hands and *YANK* it straight down in one fast pull.  The skin will
get stuck on the main quills of the wings just past the second joint.  
Cut the wing at that joint.  Total time spent: About 45-60 seconds.

 Gutting:  Cut the abdominal skin following the bottom of the rib cage
down each side and back to the tail.  Reach in as far as you can and grab
the windpipe.  Pull it all out at once scraping the lungs out with your
fingers as you go.  Toss the carcass in the five gallon bucket of water
and grab the next bird soon as it stops running around.

Signature

RCOS #7
IBA# 11465
http://imagesdesavions.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

Stephen! - 29 Nov 2008 08:13 GMT
BryanUT <nestle12@comcast.net> wrote in news:6ebee2fc-5ad3-4c4f-8b08-
ad64f2d7f1d7@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com:

>> ÿButchering day isn't much fun either. ÿ
>
> No doubt.  But I think Ted Nugent would disagree.

 Don't *even* get me started on those a.sholes and their "hunting"
shows...  "Oh look, Bubba!  Thar's a deer!  I can't imagine why that deer
would be coming to the same pile of corn we've been throwing out there
all summer! Let's wait until he gets within 50 yards of this here blind
we're hiding in and blow him away with this .270!"

 Yah...  That's hunting just as much as going up to the counter and
saying "Give me three pounds of salmon." is fishing.

Signature

RCOS #7
IBA# 11465
http://imagesdesavions.com
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.