I have REAL bad FORM.
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Coleman E. Howard - 23 Jun 2005 10:58 GMT I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since my last trackday. However, I was noticing that when I went into the turns, I was feeling I could go faster, but the way I was positioned wasn't allowing that. I know that sounds funny, but that is the way it was. My girlfriend was my pit-girl and coach because she did a trackday last week, and I didn't. After each session, she would tell me how awkward I was looking in the turns.
Okay, I understood SOME of what I was doing wrong, and I knew I couldn't correct all that on this trackday. So, I just eased back a little and tried to make some very small corrections in my position. Even with that, I was trying to be a little extra carefull because I didn't want to wad my bike either! :) I am still in the novice/beginner class, so I am not going to beat up on myself too much! :)
We will be doing VIR on July 2nd, and July 3rd, and I have already made up my mind, that both of those days, I will be working soley on my body position, and if I can get something going, start trying to get on the gas a little be earlier. This chit is a lot to comprehend, and I need a lot of improvement in ALL AREAS. I plan on taking real small baby steps in trying to solve them.
Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot of work to do when I turn 65 too..:)
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
P.S. both of my bikes have been fully repaired since their crashes. On the RC51, I even fixed my plate in a legal position with a light! :) How about that!!! :)
Yanni c)k - 23 Jun 2005 11:16 GMT >I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson >Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since >my last trackday. <snip> Maybe you should just slow down until you feel totally relaxed and then build up slowly speed from there. I tell you what I just discovered - after a back massage I never felt so relaxed and never rode better! I'm sure you just know too much and feel not enough.
ceh - 23 Jun 2005 14:06 GMT "Yanni c\)k" wrote:
>>I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson >>Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >a back massage I never felt so relaxed and never rode better! I'm sure you >just know too much and feel not enough. That is that route I plan to take. Usually the novice class is broke up into 2 or 3 groups, slow, medium and fast. Lately I have been going in the medium group. This time, I am going to go with the slow group and concentrate on getting myself into a better position.
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
saddlebag@aol.com - 23 Jun 2005 11:59 GMT > Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot > of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg Lookin good Coleman, lookin good.
Coleman E. Howard - 23 Jun 2005 14:08 GMT "Anonymous User" wrote:
>> Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot >> of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > >Lookin good Coleman, lookin good. I wish, I wish!! :)
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
Greek Shipping Magnets - 23 Jun 2005 15:25 GMT >Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot >of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) Upper body's way too stiff. You still have mental block from your last crash.
Concentrate on hanging on with your knees more and forget the deathgrip on the bars.
Coleman E. Howard - 23 Jun 2005 21:11 GMT >Upper body's way too stiff. You still have mental block from your last >crash. > >Concentrate on hanging on with your knees more and forget the >deathgrip on the bars. Thanks, will include those tips when I am at VIR..
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
Andy Burnett - 23 Jun 2005 16:02 GMT <snip many words>
> Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got > a lot of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg Coleman, I agree you ought to work on your body position. You said a lot about that, but you didn't say what you think you should be doing instead. Can you describe the changes you plan to make?
ab
Coleman E. Howard - 24 Jun 2005 16:44 GMT >"Coleman E. Howard" <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote in >Coleman, I agree you ought to work on your body position. You said a lot >about that, but you didn't say what you think you should be doing instead. >Can you describe the changes you plan to make? > >ab Andy, I am starting at the bottom, with my feet. I am going to revamp my whole position the bike. Getting my feet into position has also been a problem. Will concentrate moving off and holding on to the bike with my knees. I will be doing this in very, very small incrediments too. :)
Also, with my upper body, need to move over more to the side with that.. There is so much,so I will just state that I am starting ALL OVER. There should be a "new" Coleman coming out of this too. :)
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
_Bob_Nixon - 23 Jun 2005 16:35 GMT >I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson >Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] >RC51, I even fixed my plate in a legal position with a light! :) How about >that!!! :) Upper body too upright & stiff Coleman. I have more or less the same problem (too many years of street riding). Not so easy to teach an old dog new tricks but all in all you're doing dammed well.
PS. The candid approach here shows your massive strength of character. Few would have the balls to put their a.s on the ASM line as you're doing. You never cease to amaze me -:) BTW, Listen to AB. He teaches this stuff for a living.
Bob Nixon, Chandler AZ 01 Sprint ST "RED" 45K miles
Coleman E. Howard - 24 Jun 2005 16:53 GMT >On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:58:08 GMT, "Coleman E. Howard" > [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Bob Nixon, Chandler AZ >01 Sprint ST "RED" 45K miles Bob, no "ego" stuff here. :).. I see mistakes, I want the world to know, and if possible get all the feedback I can to correct them. IMO, that is not so much strength of character, that is being smart.:) I want to be able to do the real thing. I see what is going on at that tracks. That track seperates the bullchitters quickly. And if you want to go around that track swiftly and smoothly, you better have your chit together. I am the first to say, I don't have my chit together, now I want to find the quickest and fastest route to get it together. And time is not on my side!! (big grin).
I caught what AB was saying. Wish I could afford a personal trainer, and be at the track 3 times a week. I would surely move up the ladder.
In the meantime, I will be taking in as many trackdays as I can. Will start working right away on this body position thing too.
Dam, the 01 Sprint is piling on the miles too.. :)
Be safe,
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
Andrew - 24 Jun 2005 17:08 GMT > I caught what AB was saying. Wish I could afford a personal trainer, and > be at the track 3 times a week. I would surely move up the ladder. If if were a personal bike instructor, yeah, but dude, you don't need no stinking personal trainer. You could be in Playgirl as is!
 Signature Andrew 00 Daytona 00 Speed Triple RCOS #7
Phil Scott - 24 Jun 2005 18:02 GMT > >On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:58:08 GMT, "Coleman E. Howard" > > [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > I caught what AB was saying. Wish I could afford a personal trainer, and > be at the track 3 times a week. I would surely move up the ladder. I recommend you find a road race loop to practice on, something under a minute then have someone time you on each lap..the mark being far ahead enough of the person so that they can hold up fingers each time you pass indicatin the last digit of your lap speed.... for 53 seconds it would be 3 fingers for instance.
You will be entirely shocked at how fast you can improve your lap times and riding ability by those means... for instance hanging off etc.. you will find that the slower the lap speed felt the faster it actually was...and that what felt fastest was actually slowest imo.. this weeds out the bad tactics fast and validates and reinforces the good habits on a real time seat of your pants feel basis.
Id say 50 laps like that could have you running in the top 10 or 20% of the AMAsportsman C class.
Phil Scott
> In the meantime, I will be taking in as many trackdays as I can. Will > start working right away on this body position thing too. [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups > http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com Larry xlax Lovisone - 23 Jun 2005 17:22 GMT This chit is a lot to comprehend, and I need a lot of
> improvement in ALL AREAS. I plan on taking real small baby steps in trying to > solve them. Correct body position is one of things I'm working on too... it ain't easy learning on your own... all you know is that your head and eyes aren't right... but thanks to Andy Burnett's coaching I now have a target body position and target transition moves... so on every ride I practice the targets making them my own... I don't think there is perfection in riding... only learning...
Larry L 94 RC45 #2 Have a wheelie NICE day... Lean & Mean it in every corner of your life... If it wasn't for us the fast lane would rust... V4'S are music to the seat of my pants... 1952 De Havilland Chipmunk... Yank and bank your brains loose... http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/-xlax-/ http://home.comcast.net/~netters2/ http://www.fox302.com/index.pl?s=vg&user=netters2 http://www.reeky.org/gallery/xlax
Yanni c)k - 24 Jun 2005 11:12 GMT > This chit is a lot to comprehend, and I need a lot of >> improvement in ALL AREAS. I plan on taking real small baby steps in [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > targets making them my own... I don't think there is perfection in > riding... only learning... Larry, well done, first time you've said something that I agree with 100%
> Larry L > 94 RC45 #2 [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > http://www.fox302.com/index.pl?s=vg&user=netters2 > http://www.reeky.org/gallery/xlax Phil Scott - 23 Jun 2005 17:53 GMT > I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson > Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > RC51, I even fixed my plate in a legal position with a light! :) How about > that!!! :) As you get older all this stuff self corrects... right now you are still young and inexperienced. At 70 or 80 you will have settled down some.
Myself, I've been having a lot of fun in turns with my butt off to the inside an inch or two at the most, not much, just a little... then using my arms to push the bike up (so its not leaning so much).. that tactic just naturally cures the situation of riding too upright and puts my upper body to the inside...
for some reason that feels good... I started it slow, under 60 mph and now its starting to become more natural... I feel much better on the fast sweepers to and from the golden gate bridge riding that way...counter steering also has become much more second nature that way. Im just more in control for some reason. Before I felt skittish in traffic in those turns (3 lanes), now I have no problem carving the traffic in those turns comfortably now... no way was it comfortable before.
I finally got rid of the front end chicken strips (just barely) but at am at the edge, and Im not riding the streets very agressively either. maybe a 7.
The rear is way over too but the tire wraps almost vertical in the rear so it has 3/4" strips left...last year strips were way over an inch, probably 1.25 "...yet Im standing the bike up in the turns (some would say hanging off, but for me that indicates hanging on the bike..and Im definintely not hanging..Im leaned over then *pushing the bike back up. )
I suppose if I wanted to haul a.s Id crouch, getting the upper body lower while riding that way. I think the right thing feels real good for some reason.. personally I use that as my monitor.
I noticed that when learning how to do feet on the pegs slides on dirt back in the good old dayz. It looked absolutely hairy but it felt slower and more stable and it felt fantastic.
the previous tactic foot out with weight on the hot shoe was hard as hell on my legs and never felt good, and it felt fast...but it was actually slower than with feet on the pegs.
Pushing the bars up (standing the bike up) for some reason added a lot of stability. Im practicing that to more extreme levels on the city street turns these days, at 20 or 30 mph. I feel much more in control. The bike really wants to turn hard with that tactic.
You can turn way too sharp that way if you are not careful... you can get on it a lot sooner coming out however and that tends to stop the turn from going too sharp.
i found for some reason when I do that I want to crouch the upper body more at that time...as i stab it a little coming out.. sometimes I have my chest over the throttle when doing that but not often. I can't afford an accident so Im taking it easy but it sure feels good and it feels a lot safer than the previous just lean and counter steer... I still counter steer the high speed turns..but may be doing a faint touch of the oposite in turns under 20 or 30 mph.
Phil Scott
Phil Scott
Andy Burnett - 23 Jun 2005 19:54 GMT "Phil Scott" <philscott@philscott.net> wrote in news:d9epek$pse$1 @news.tdl.com:
> As you get older all this stuff self corrects... right now you > are still young and inexperienced. At 70 or 80 you will have > settled down some. Nonsense. It only self-corrects if you have a goal in mind and work to get there. Otherwise you just perpetuate bad habits.
ab
Andrew - 23 Jun 2005 18:02 GMT > I finished my 4th track day on June 19th at Summit Point, on the Jefferson > Circiut. I was a little more relaxed and felt a little more confident since [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > RC51, I even fixed my plate in a legal position with a light! :) How about > that!!! :) You could be in a bit better form. Remember this is coming from a fat guy with bad form!
Take a Superbike School, or some kind of Track Class where they teach you proper body positioning.
You don't look too bad though. Hell, you look great for your age!
 Signature Andrew 00 Daytona 00 Speed Triple RCOS #7
saddlebag@aol.com - 23 Jun 2005 22:41 GMT > You don't look too bad though. Hell, you look great for your age! Can you believe it? Sheesh, something to which we should all aspire. But I do notice that he used to get much bigger lean angles while dragging a hand just piddling around WV backroads. Maybe his mishap has given him the heebejeebies afterall.
Coleman E. Howard - 24 Jun 2005 17:10 GMT "Anonymous User" wrote:
>> You don't look too bad though. Hell, you look great for your age! > >Can you believe it? Sheesh, something to which we should all aspire. But >I do notice that he used to get much bigger lean angles while dragging a >hand just piddling around WV backroads. Maybe his mishap has given him >the heebejeebies afterall. You made a good point there. Down at my old stompin grouds where they have those technical curves, I could go into the curve fast, get on the gas, knee almost plants to the ground around the whole curve.
Not so at that track.:( Different ball game. Yes, I do have the heebee jeebies too. First, I don't want to hit that ground again, and I dam sure don't want to wad my bike. :) I know, I need a track bike. Will get one, but in the meantime, I am riding my RC51, that looks like it is a show bike.
This is a new format, different page, and a new story. Got to start all over fresh. Got to throw all the gangster stuff in the twistees out the window, cause it ain't working here at that track! :)
Good feedback, thanks..
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
Brutus - 23 Jun 2005 18:22 GMT > Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot > of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg Coleman, here's my take:
Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to roll your inside ( into the turn) shoulder further foward and lower. If you look at pictures of the real racers most with be using this body position with of course some variations.
Naturally it takes quite awhile to become comfortable and fluent with any body change, so take it easy while you're making the adjustments.
BTW major thumbs-up to your improving riding skills. It makes a fellow 64 year old feel mighty proud to see another (of any age really) learning new techniques...
Andrew - 23 Jun 2005 19:53 GMT >>Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot >>of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > BTW major thumbs-up to your improving riding skills. It makes a fellow 64 year old feel mighty proud > to see another (of any age really) learning new techniques... Brutus, during the trackday when we had the chicane out at PIR, your advice on body position really helped me out!
 Signature Andrew 00 Daytona 00 Speed Triple RCOS #7
Andy Burnett - 23 Jun 2005 19:57 GMT > Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to > roll your inside ( into the turn) shoulder further foward and lower. Similar to this?
http://home.comcast.net/~andy.burnett/Pics/CSS/VIR.jpg
ab
saddlebag@aol.com - 23 Jun 2005 22:48 GMT >>Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to >>roll your inside ( into the turn) shoulder further foward and lower. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > ab I think it's kinda hard to tell from the rear view. He's about 8 ft tall ya know. He is certainly not stiff arming the bars. I mean just look at the contortion his poor legs have to do just to get to the pegs. I think if I bent my leg like that for more than 30 seconds my body would go into irreversible death spasms.
Andy Burnett - 23 Jun 2005 23:03 GMT > I think it's kinda hard to tell from the rear view. He's about 8 ft > tall ya know. He is certainly not stiff arming the bars. Are you talking about the pictures Coleman posted? It's not hard to tell at all and he is absolutely stiff-arming the bars. Have a look at his right arm in particular. It's straight as an arrow and he's pushing the bike under him with it. His hips are twisted to the right (around the gas tank) and that's prying his left knee off the tank. In that position, he cannot anchor himself solidly on the bike and thus *has* to hang on with his arms. Telling him to loosen up before fixing how he anchors himself to the bike is pointless -- if he really loosened up in that position, he'd fall off the bike.
> I mean just look at the contortion his poor legs have to do just to > get to the pegs. I think if I bent my leg like that for more than 30 > seconds my body would go into irreversible death spasms. Aaaah, it isn't that bad!
saddlebag@aol.com - 24 Jun 2005 01:14 GMT >>I think it's kinda hard to tell from the rear view. He's about 8 ft >>tall ya know. He is certainly not stiff arming the bars. > > Are you talking about the pictures Coleman posted? It's not hard to > tell at all and he is absolutely stiff-arming the bars. In the second picture it is hard to tell. In the first, his right arm has a 90 degree bend! Have another look.
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg
If he's stiff arming the bar it's only because his elbow is poking him in the ribs. Maybe somewhere between that and Ben Spies lies the next Mat Maladin?
Have a look at
> his right arm in particular. It's straight as an arrow and he's pushing > the bike under him with it. His hips are twisted to the right (around the > gas tank) and that's prying his left knee off the tank. The crack of his a.s appears to me to be parallel with the centerline of the bike and offset about 8 inches to the inside. You're one picky dood.
Andy Burnett - 24 Jun 2005 05:23 GMT > In the second picture it is hard to tell. In the first, his right arm > has a 90 degree bend! Have another look. > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg You and I are seeing the shot differently. That's the one I was looking at too. His arm is pointing down and forward at a 45 degree angle and the elbow is very nearly straight. It simply has to be when he's sitting so upright.
You actually can't literally see whether the arm is bent or not from that angle, but you can judge the length of his arms from shoulder to elbow on the left, which is bent a bit. Because the bars are a reach forward and his body is upright, the arm can't be bent very much and still reach the bar. A lot of guys do this; that photo is what they look like from behind.
>> Have a look at his right arm in particular. It's straight as an >> arrow and he's pushing the bike under him with it. His hips are [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > of the bike and offset about 8 inches to the inside. You're one picky > dood. You have no idea! ;)
I'm not worried about how much his a.s is off the seat; I'm interested in the fact that the rest of his body isn't off with it. While his a.s is off the seat, his head and shoulders are almost directly behind the bubble. If you envision the relationship between hips and spine as a T- square, you see that if the a.s is off the side and the upper body isn't, the hips must rotate a little on the seat. Even three degrees of rotation will pry the outside knee off the tank and your point of contact is now shear force across the back of the tank. If your hips are square to the tank, you can lock your knee into the tank scoop and your weight is pressing the knee straight into the side of the tank. If your hips are turned, the knee comess off the outside of the tank and you're being held on by the friction of leather against paint on the back of the tank. Not too secure. Riders who do this ride around feeling like they're falling off and tighten up on the bars to compensate. That's why I care.
ab
Yanni c)k - 24 Jun 2005 11:23 GMT <snip> Thanks or excellent appraisal
Jamin Kortegard - 24 Jun 2005 09:26 GMT > In the second picture it is hard to tell. In the first, his right arm > has a 90 degree bend! Have another look. http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg
In the above shots, Coleman's upper body isn't lined up with the bike. He's actually leaning in toward the bike's centerline, so that his shoulders and head are closer to the centerline than his hips are. If his right arm were relaxed and bent, he wouldn't be able to do that.
He's putting effort into hanging off the bike, but I don't know how much he's really reducing his lean angle at any given speed since his upper body isn't leaned out that far. I think he'd be better off leaving his butt closer to the middle of the seat and leaning in with his inside shoulder and pointing his chin into the corner.
 Signature Jamin Kortegard popular sportbike / popular car
"Hokey 600s and trackday usability are no match for a good literbike at your side, kid." - Michael
~kurt - 24 Jun 2005 03:22 GMT > he cannot anchor himself solidly on the bike and thus *has* to hang on with > his arms. Telling him to loosen up before fixing how he anchors himself to Maybe some of those Stomp tank grip pads would help. It sure makes it a lot easier to hold on with the legs and use the handlebars as control surfaces.
- Kurt
Andy Burnett - 24 Jun 2005 05:24 GMT > Maybe some of those Stomp tank grip pads would help. It sure makes it > a lot easier to hold on with the legs and use the handlebars as > control surfaces Certainly wouldn't hurt!
ab
G C - 24 Jun 2005 00:01 GMT >>Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to >>roll your inside ( into the turn) shoulder further foward and lower. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > ab I would love to look that compact on the bike! In order to do it, I would need to lenghten the bike about 8". Tucked down, My elbows are behind my knees. I'm building rearsets now to move the feet back but not up a whole hell of a lot. 6'-1" on a Ducati just isn't cutting it. This Sunday is my next track day. After the last one the organizers wouldn't let me continue anymore in the superstreet group and have moved me up. I'm not really looking forward to putting the target on my back again, but as the speed increases, so the lines get better. (I liked be one of the fastest in the slow group, now I'll be THE slowest in a fast group.)
 Signature Gopher 33 28 19N 112 01 49W '77 CB750K '78 CB750K '00 ZG1000 '96 Ducati 900SS **********pull 'mychain' to reply*********** ("I've abandoned the idea of trying to appear a normal, pleasant person. I had to accept myself as I was, even if no one else could accept me. For the rest of my life I would continue to say precisely the wrong thing, touch people in the raw and be generally unpopular. I had a natural gift for it" W. F. Temple)
saddlebag@aol.com - 24 Jun 2005 01:33 GMT > I would love to look that compact on the bike! In order to do it, I > would need to lenghten the bike about 8". Tucked down, My elbows are [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > one of the fastest in the slow group, now I'll be THE slowest in a fast > group.) I'm thinking just the opposite. I signed up for the fast group this time in hopes of being the slow guy. I don't particularly like having to pass on the outside. On fast sweepers it's OK, but when the track snakes, the outside lane soon becomes the inside and I don't want to get kicked out for making an inside pass. My bikes are reasonably fast, but with me on it it won't keep up with the thin guys on the latest hardware down the straights. So it can be - catch up and dawdle - catch up and dawdle - with the newbies. Besides, isn't the idea to catch on from following the fast guys around?
G C - 24 Jun 2005 06:06 GMT >> I would love to look that compact on the bike! In order to do it, I >> would need to lenghten the bike about 8". Tucked down, My elbows are [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > catch up and dawdle - catch up and dawdle - with the newbies. > Besides, isn't the idea to catch on from following the fast guys around? Yeah, thats how I got quick enough to eventually be fast. But thank Diety of Choice that we are not restricted to only passing on the outside. The old Duc doesn't have the oomph to do that to all the liter bikes out on the track with me. I'd guess that 75% of all my passes are on the inside. More often than not, the newbie is going to go wide in the corner. I'd much rather be going faster on the inside.
The top group is outside my desire at this time. I don't want to hold up folks like Jensen, Ledezma, Stone, Elchlepp etal.
I remember street riding with Stone before either of us started track riding. He kicked my a.s in the mountains on his H-D Tourbike. Damn near wanted to throw the Kawi away. Instead, I started to learn how to ride swiftly.
Funny thing about the track for me. The more I time spend on the track, the less time I want to spend on the road.
 Signature Gopher 33 28 19N 112 01 49W '77 CB750K '78 CB750K '00 ZG1000 '96 Ducati 900SS **********pull 'mychain' to reply*********** ("I've abandoned the idea of trying to appear a normal, pleasant person. I had to accept myself as I was, even if no one else could accept me. For the rest of my life I would continue to say precisely the wrong thing, touch people in the raw and be generally unpopular. I had a natural gift for it" W. F. Temple)
Andrew - 24 Jun 2005 17:06 GMT > Funny thing about the track for me. The more I time spend on the track, > the less time I want to spend on the road. I think it's that way for all of us.
 Signature Andrew 00 Daytona 00 Speed Triple RCOS #7
Brutus - 24 Jun 2005 04:14 GMT > > Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to > > roll your inside ( into the turn) shoulder further foward and lower. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > ab Yeh, that's closer to the form that I have in mind. Although I think that you too might be able to roll your body a little bit further foward and perhaps move your head down. As I remember, this photo was taken while you were instructing during a track day and I'm pretty sure you aren't riding up to your race pace, it still looks mighty fast though!
There's a saying in racing about putting your head down and going for it....
One other thing that I notice alot even in club race events is riders not placing their hang-off leg further foward. Many riders seem pleased to hang their leg at a 90 degree angle to the bike, while this might look good to some I don't think it's the correct ( if there is a correct) form for the really fast rider.
A number of years ago Troy posted some photos of riders hanging off at a track day and asked for opinions about who was going faster. It turned out that the rider that was over exaggerating his hang-off leg (90 degrees out) was in fact going slower. Of course if you aren't able to get your braking, turn-in points, and other go fast techniques down, body position form may not be all that relevant.
Andy Burnett - 24 Jun 2005 05:34 GMT > Yeh, that's closer to the form that I have in mind. Although I think > that you too might be able to roll your body a little bit further > foward and perhaps move your head down. As I remember, this photo was > taken while you were instructing during a track day and I'm pretty > sure you aren't riding up to your race pace, it still looks mighty > fast though! I don't know for sure who I was working with when the shot was taken, but I think the pace was pretty casual. At times, I do bring my head and shoulders down and to the inside, but I don't do it if I don't need to.
> A number of years ago Troy posted some photos of riders hanging off > at a track day and asked for opinions about who was going faster. It > turned out that the rider that was over exaggerating his hang-off leg > (90 degrees out) was in fact going slower. Of course if you aren't > able to get your braking, turn-in points, and other go fast techniques > down, body position form may not be all that relevant. There's truth to that, though it can be different for different riders. Some guys reach a cornering clearance limit because they're not hanging off. Working on body position is the next step for these guys. Once they get a little clearance back, something else may become more important.
Also, some riders end up slowing down a little when they are hanging off for the first time. If you're changing something about your riding, it'll take some of your attention. Since you need a few extra cycles to change your technique, you might have to slow down a little to give yourself the bandwidth. If you're truly riding at 100%, there isn't any "spare change" for altering your technique. With that in mind, someone who is trying out a new position that feels wierd may slow down quite a bit, at least temporarily.
ab
Coleman E. Howard - 24 Jun 2005 17:01 GMT >Your upper body looks to be a bit to upright. Why don't you try to roll your inside ( into the >turn) shoulder further foward and lower. If you look at pictures of the real racers most with be [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >BTW major thumbs-up to your improving riding skills. It makes a fellow 64 year old feel mighty proud >to see another (of any age really) learning new techniques... 1+
I got two sweet trackdays coming up at VIR with my girlfriend. We both are going to be working on body position 80% of the time. And my changes will be done in baby steps too. ;)
Yeah, at 64 I am feeling like a kid with a sweet sucker in his mouth! :) On the 29th of this month I am doing a AFF skydive, that is going to add a few more grey hairs to the old noggin too. :)
Be safe over there,
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
Jamin Kortegard - 24 Jun 2005 09:14 GMT > Pic of the old man's bad form at Summit Point on the JC.. Yeah, I got a lot > of work to do when I turn 65 too..:) > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform2.jpg Coleman, it looks to me that you're stiff-arming the bars. You might try relaxing your arms a bit more, keeping your elbows bent and flexible. This might require you to lower your upper body some, closer to the tank.
I know that when I let my elbows and arms get tense, I feel very awkward going into curves. If I catch myself doing that, I deliberately think about loosening up, holding onto the bike with my feet and legs more, and only using my arms for working the controls and turning the bars, trying to keep as light a touch as possible. I've even been known to flap my elbows like a duck when heading toward a curve, just to be sure they're nice and relaxed.
I think it's great that you're having so much fun with all the track days. Thanks for letting us tag along! :)
 Signature Jamin Kortegard popular sportbike / popular car
"Hokey 600s and trackday usability are no match for a good literbike at your side, kid." - Michael
Coleman E. Howard - 25 Jun 2005 10:15 GMT > Coleman, it looks to me that you're stiff-arming the bars. You might try > relaxing your arms a bit more, keeping your elbows bent and flexible. This [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] > I think it's great that you're having so much fun with all the track days. > Thanks for letting us tag along! :) Jamin, I got a ton of info from you all here on where I am going wrong, the next thing is to apply it in small steps. The fun is over the top, I have been a track-nut in my later years! :) Who would have thought that!!
Here is another glancing pic of me stiff arming the bike..
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/jc102ch.jpg
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
Andy Burnett - 25 Jun 2005 16:37 GMT "Coleman E. Howard" <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote in news:ih9ve.1533 $Tk2.400@trnddc02:
> Here is another glancing pic of me stiff arming the bike.. > > http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/jc102ch.jpg On the plus side, you have a nice tight line there.
ab
Coleman E. Howard - 26 Jun 2005 00:24 GMT >"Coleman E. Howard" <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote in news:ih9ve.1533 >$Tk2.400@trnddc02: [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > >ab I do have my moments! :) :) :)
Dam Andy, I wish you were somewhere close by. Would love to hook up with you. I would be a teacher that loves to teach, and a student that loves to learn!! :)..
In the next couple months, there is going to be a new Coleman..:) I am not fast anyway, so need to say I will get slower to get faster, but all my attention will be going on to getting the tall old slim body in the right position..:)
Thanks much to all(AMS),
ceh 2001 GSX R1000 2003 RC51 (64 & fast)
-- Sent via MotorCycle Newsgroups http://www.motorcyclenewsgroups.com
~kurt - 26 Jun 2005 18:06 GMT Coleman E Howard <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote:
> Dam Andy, I wish you were somewhere close by. Would love to hook up with > you. I would be a teacher that loves to teach, and a student that loves > to learn!! :).. You should sign up for CLASS down at VIR this July. They appear to still have openings on both Thursday July 21 and Fri July 22. I'll be bringing my RC51 down there Thur (it was $45 cheaper than Fri). I just got the frame sliders on - so the bike should be good to go.
<http://www.classrides.com/calendar05/calendar.html>
> In the next couple months, there is going to be a new Coleman..:) I am > not fast anyway, so need to say I will get slower to get faster, but all > my attention will be going on to getting the tall old slim body in the > right position..:) I still highly recommend the Stomp tank pads:
<http://www.speedwerks.com/catalog/c132m151bm10b0s1pn1p4823np0>
I actually bought the generic version through Keith Code's Superbike school store, but you can now buy ones that are custom fit for your bike. The generic one actually fit the RC51 perfectly when the pad was turned upside down.
They are not the best looking things in the world, but they make a world of difference in how the bike feels.
- Kurt
saddlebag@aol.com - 26 Jun 2005 21:26 GMT > Coleman E Howard <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > have openings on both Thursday July 21 and Fri July 22. I'll be bringing > my RC51 down there Thur (it was $45 cheaper than Fri). $80 bucks cheaper to ride Mid-O Tuesday than Monday. I asked the lady manning their phones why. She said to get people to try and even out the numbers both days but admitted that everyone had signed up for Tuesday. Might actually be better to go Monday...one might have the track to themselves.
> I actually bought the generic version through Keith Code's Superbike school > store, but you can now buy ones that are custom fit for your bike. The [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > They are not the best looking things in the world, but they make a world of > difference in how the bike feels. Back to AB's point about turning hips to the right. Look at ALL of these guys.
http://www.proframe.org/sport/tt2005-motogp.html
They are all turning their hips substantially farther than Coleman. The cracks of all their a.ses are at anywhere from a 30 to 45 degree angle off the centerline of the bike. What gives? When I look at Colman's pic:
http://mysite.verizon.net/cehowardrc51/badform.jpg
and AB's pic:
http://home.comcast.net/~andy.burnett/Pics/CSS/VIR.jpg
What I see is that both of those two keep their butts parallel with the centerline of the bike. AB manages to keep his back along the same path where Coleman's angles slightly back to the left. But neither is riding the GP Chubbie Checker twist style of those guys.
Phil Scott - 26 Jun 2005 22:11 GMT > > Coleman E Howard <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote: > > [quoted text clipped - 40 lines] > where Coleman's angles slightly back to the left. But neither is riding > the GP Chubbie Checker twist style of those guys. Thats because those guys are pushing the edge.. way out of whack for the normal rider to develop and accomodate to .... especially when riding on the street...the racers are demonstrating an extreme.
Andy is demonstrating whats useful on the back roads where one is not counting on even traction and is not pushing the G forces to the same limit....leaning off at those extremes on the street would force turn speeds needed to keep the bike up way too high.
Lately Ive been leaning my upper body, shoulders and head into the turn so my chest is over the outside bar and Im looking past the side of my tall somewhat narrow wind screen.. that presses the outside knee into the tank naturally.. seems to provide a lot more stabiltiy and instill confidence, and the bike is not laid over near as far in relation to corner speed...I'd say corner speed is up30% or more as compared to straight up riding.
With clip ons, from the rear it would look typical to Andy's race course picture...not that good of form no doubt ...but along those lines.
With the higher wider bars I have no idea how it looks.. but it feels real good to say the least. Even at the edge of the front tire it feels better. I think it might something related to the center of gravity being inboard of the axis of lateral rotation. In other words the CG is *inboard of that axis so ones body wt has leverage against centrifical forces.
As speeds pick up I tend to get the upper body lower but with higher bars thats limited.. thus for haul a.s riders the necessity for clip ons.
With the CG in the center of the rotating mass, as with Colemans pic, the net CG it has no leverage against centifical force on the center of lateral rotation forced by the bikes contact with the road.
With the CG say outside the center the rotating mass, as if keeping the body upright in a turn, the CG has leverage in favor of centrifical forces tending to high side the bike.
Thats why you see the world class flat trackers leaning way in, with the body mass low.. the more of that you do, the farther inboard of the bikes natural CG is the net actual center of gravity rider included.
Why is it then that the dirt track riders lean in but DO NOT hang off and also keep the bikes much closer to upright than road racers.
Thats because on the dirt... traction is a killer issue. and so the bike needs to be kept largely upright on the tire patches for maximum traction/
centrifical forces are countered by crossing the bike up and having rear wheel traction drive the front end of the bike into the turn against these forces.
So the rider leans in, but the bike stays closer to vertical. On short tracks the bike is very often entirely verticle in the turns. It doesnt high side only because the rear wheel is spinning and there is not enough traction to keep the back from drifting out...so its a balance... maintained by the rider/ bike body mass inboard of the bikes CG.
On the street, with unpredicatable traction a mix of the two works best apparently.
For demo's one would look at motard racing pics.
Phil Scott
Phil Scott
Andy Burnett - 27 Jun 2005 00:49 GMT "Phil Scott" <philscott@philscott.net> wrote in news:d9n5lj$nkj$1 @news.tdl.com:
> Thats because those guys are pushing the edge.. way out of > whack for the normal rider to develop and accomodate to .... > especially when riding on the street...the racers are > demonstrating an extreme. It isn't because of that at all. These guys are hanging off the way they are because that's how they learned and it's what they are accustomed to. There's definitely more than one way to go about it, but some ways are more secure for most people than others. Doohan was another example of a guy who rode around crossed up on the bike and made it work.
Two notable examples of current roadracers who don't cross up much if at all: Mladin & Rossi. Go find pictures of them.
The shots in the link Saddle found are shots of guys who are working a little harder than necessary. Doesn't make them wrong, but it does make their jobs a little tougher.
ab
Jim S - 27 Jun 2005 05:54 GMT "Coleman E. Howard" <cehowardrx7@netzero.net> wrote in message After each session, she would tell me how awkward I was looking in
> the turns. Ok, but no one ever said that Joey Dunlap looked cool either. But no one ever saw him except from the rear, as he disappeared around the next corner. Times are what count, looking awkward might get the job done in your case.
 Signature Jim Stinnett VTR1000 R1100RS YZF R1 http://moto-rama.com
|
|
|