> Went on the longest ride I have done so far on this bike yet. A far
> cry of what I have done in the past but...the weather wasn't playing
> nice. Got hit by rain mid-way.
> I'm so bored I'm f.cking with Harley salesmen for amusement. Sad
> part is, I know far more about their bikes than they do...
Try Buells!
Realizing they were the only dealer within 50 miles that
could service it was enough to make me think twice.
>> Went on the longest ride I have done so far on this bike yet. A far
>> cry of what I have done in the past but...the weather wasn't playing
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>This is something new for me. I actually enjoy riding in wicked rain
>storms (so long as I'm appropriately dressed).
I don't mind riding in the rain either...when it's 80+ degrees out and
I don't freeze my butt off in the process. Done it in Florida all the
time.
But rain at 40-50 degrees temperatures just does not feel all that
nice...
>But it is friggin spring now and every day I wake it is either 23F or
>42F, gray and pissing. The f.cking sea level is supposed to rise like
>3' due to global warming in this century and this is the best I can
>get?!
It's the melting snow that causes a lot of it, around here anyway. The
ground is still either too frozen or saturated to absorb much of the
water so most of it has to evaporate. And we all know, what goes
up....must come down.
--
Stephan
2003 Yamaha R6
> I hate rain.
>
> This is something new for me. I actually enjoy riding in wicked rain
> storms (so long as I'm appropriately dressed).
The Ford is in the shop again, so I'll be riding the bike in the rain
until it is fixed. 3,000 miles ago, when a bearing in the drive train
went, it was just starting to get really cold and we had a lot of heavy
rain. I have to admit, it is kinda fun when you have good tires.
- Kurt

Signature
Phil Scott
Ideas are bullet proof.
>
>> Went on the longest ride I have done so far on this bike
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> best I can
> get?!
In brief, polar cap melting alone can raise the sea levels 20'
or more... sudden cooling after that, due dust in the air from
a meteor strike or volcanic action, can predipate easily
another 40' of water ... for a40' to 60' total. thats
conservative.
I have not done all the calcs or research, but some of the
numbers are very high...they would need to be checked.
20' is the current projection without a sudden cooling after
the polar caps melt.. that means 10' rise by 2051,,,, and 5'
rise by 2030, and 3' rise in sea levels by 2021... 15
years from now... accompanied by storms the likes of which we
have never seen.
Re the stats:
the 20' figure was around when I was a kid, as a prediction,,,
it was well known and calculated from the volume of water in
the polar caps.
Govt spin
... then about 10 years ago until last week we got nothing but
bogus numbers... 6 inches etc... that was all spin by
government. ludicrous logic, ignoriing the ice cap melt and
addressing only the thermal expansion of warmer ocean water
gives the 6" figure....
the duplicity was obvious. The straight story will crash a
very high percentage of the most valuable real estate prices
world wide... bank security is mostly in real estate..the good
stuff is not in the high deserts either... is low elevation
ocean front property.
that news had to be supressed.
I bring this up because I think we will see a 3' rise within
15 years, maybe more.... why?
Because china and india will use massive amounts of foscil
fuels in that time frame, long before they can go nuclear for
their energy or to hydrogen...and the US can't change fast
enough to cut back...the surge will drive a faster melt than
is currently being put on the table.
This is happening fast enough that you can check your local
high tide tables each year and see to what degree this is
actually happening or not.. its not something anyone can hide.
If the trend is 2" a year, then in 10 years it will be 20"
almost 2'. Thats how you can separate the smoke from whats
actually going on... if your hotel sits on the beach... it
could be worthless in 10 or 15 years....banks loan for 30
years or longer... these will not loan heavily into the
underwater real estate market.
There are entire cities world wide where the real estate
prices will drop 90% if the full impact of the polar melt is
known... even 100 years out.. in the financial markets thats
not long... no large corporation will eager to buy into
property that will be under water in 50 or 100 years.... thats
because even if it will not affect business short term, the
property will be saleable or useful as collateral.
thats why this issue has been lied about for so long.
Atmospheric humidity issues.
There is a chart used in the air conditioning business
developed by Willis Carrier in 1926 or earlier, called the
psychrometric chart.
that shows the percenage by weight of water in air at any
given temperature and relative humidity... pressure and
temperature gradients in the atmosphere cause this to
precipate out.... rain in other words. Most of the water
stays aloft.
No problem.
However with polar cap melt and oceans up 20'..., then even a
modest meteor strike of large vocanic event...would put dust
in the air blocking the solar rays and we will have another
sudden cooling...
How much? for a wild guess lets say that we can wring out
1/16" water column from a 12" column of air... thats very
conservative...we can do that..
To find out how much water that is we say that atmosphere at
an average density of whatever... is 5 miles tall. (air
liners fly at 5 to 7 miles, the air is plenty dense that
high...but lets be
conservative and say its 1 mile...
at 5,280 feet per mile... we are going to assume a meteor
strike or volcano will put enough dust in the air to cool the
atmosphere enough on average to precipitate just a 1/32" of
water in the bottom of each column foot. .. thats a very
conservative amount of water
to get how much water that is per square foot of the earth
surface just multiply (5,280' x 12 to get column inches),
then multiply by 0.0325" per inch of moisture that will give
you inches of water, divide that by 12 to get back to feet,
and you get a hell of a lot of water...
thats just if we wring trace levels of water out of the lowest
1 mile layer of the atmosphere we get a lot of water (many
variables see link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_conversions_and_formulas_for_air_dispersion_
modeling...
another way of getting to a a more obvious number is to
visualize a mile high column of air, and assume that it
contains. .001% by *volume water, water that will precipate
out due to cooling in any particular pressure temperature
range..
.001 x 5,280 = 5.28' of water in a one mile column of air,
Do the math yourself, the numbers will amaze you... even the
very rough numbers indicate enough water to flood thousands of
the worlds cities under 100' elevation.
....in summary the figure will run between 20' and over 100 ft
column of water. per every square foot of the surface of the
earth... thats being ultra conservative, hard calcs at the
extremes go much higher.
The earth has always been very active with severe climate
changes,,, new studies are showing some of these happen in
months or a few short years... and those were without mankind
creating greenhouse gasses etc. The next spike will be much
faster than previous ones, and you will be able to notice it
by looking at tide chart peaks as they change over time....
its a no bullshit deal that way.
If we get modest meteor strike or good sized volcanic
erruption about now, that will stop the global warming and
start a cooling cycle or as in the past, create an ice age.
These are random events... mankinds addition of green house
gas simply exacerbates one of the scenario's...warming... it
would save us though in the event of naturally caused
cooling.. the green house gasses would be good then.
So what does all this mean to a bike rider...it means ride
hearty... haul a.s... keep it clean...and eat sushi.. because
regardless there is not a damn thing we are going to be able
to do about any of it as things stand now...
well you can look at the tide tables and sell your sea level
property if the peak tide charts start to show a rising
trend... extrapolate accordingly... you will have to be at
least 10 or 20 years early to profit though..if you dont mind
screwing the buyer.
Other property is sinking at a couple of inches a year... in
florida and the gulf coast... due to ground water pumping...
add a 2" a year sea level increase, and the whole mess is a
deep salt water bogg.
That will be good for bass fishing though. Most of us will
live to see much of this unfold.
You see, land at 20' elevation will be underwater in most
storms when the high tide tables go up 10' from current
levels...and thats all that counts... if yer hotel is sucking
mud all winter, thats bad for business.
Btw the scientology Hotel in clearwater florida and its huge
new (block square) super power building is at 20'
elevation...two blocks from the gulf.... in 30 or 40 years
storm surges will be washing through their lobby.
However much sooner, in a year or two, we will see cat 5 and
higher storms in the gulf. with storm surges over 40'... its
going to be nasty for this entire part of the US.
Phil Scott
.
> I'm so ready to go on a warm sunny spring vacation that this
> is killing
> me. I'm so bored I'm f.cking with Harley salesmen for
> amusement. Sad
> part is, I know far more about their bikes than they do...
JohnS - 26 Mar 2006 06:47 GMT
Hello group,
Got myself a '92 VFR, first bike, love the machine. You're a nice
bunch-a-folks, very entertaining at times :)
At times such as this :-
[snip]
> we will have another sudden cooling...
>
> How much? for a wild guess lets say that we can wring out 1/16" water
> column from a 12" column of air... thats very conservative...we can do
> that..
[snip]
I've been lurking here a while and generally I like the [OT] issues that
Phil brings up.
This one goes just a little over the board.
For source numbers see:
Saturated Water Pressure, Density for Water -
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/kinetic/watvap.html
Capacity and Volume conversion online -
http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/volume
Assuming the bottom 1 mile of the atmosphere has average temperature of 20C
(68F) and it is saturated to 100% relative humidity, every cubic meter of
air will have 17.3 grams of water vapors. Assuming that the global cooling
will drop average temperature to 0C (32F), (which in itself would be much
bigger problem than the precipitation), at that temp the air will hold about
4.85 g/m3, precipitating the difference 17.3 - 4.85 = 12.45 g/m3
Converting the difference to imperial units we get:
(m3 = 35.3147 ft3) : 12.45 / 35.31467 ~ 0.3525 gram/foot3
(gram of water = 1 milliliter = 0.06102374 cubic inch) : 0.3525 * 0.061 ~
0.02151 cubic inches of water per cubic foot of air
over a square foot (144 square inches) : 0.02151 / 144 ~ 0.0001494" thick
layer (that's 1/6700 of an inch).
for a mile (5280 feet) : 0.7888 inches of water layer
While 0.8 inches of water is still very noticeable amount, it's very very
different from the suggested 330 feet.
HTH
--john
Phil Scott - 26 Mar 2006 07:07 GMT

Signature
Phil Scott
Ideas are bullet proof.
> Hello group,
> Got myself a '92 VFR, first bike, love the machine. You're a
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> HTH
> --john
errrr John... I think your .8" number is about as loopy as the
330' I hinted at. I think we are missing something here
although your numbers looked well derived.
Think about this intuitively... you are saying yer 1 mile
column of air is holding less than 0.8" column of water.?..
not.
Maybe 8" at the least.
after having typed this I will go look at yer charts... I
wasnt able to find them myself.. but .8 sounds way low.
Phil Scott
JohnS - 26 Mar 2006 07:34 GMT
>> While 0.8 inches of water is still very noticeable amount, it's very very
>> different from the suggested 330 feet.
>
> Think about this intuitively... you are saying yer 1 mile column of air is
> holding less than 0.8" column of water.?.. not.
To be precise, I'm saying 1 mile can hold about 1.1" of water at 68F and it
will drop .8" out if cooled to 32F.
This of cause does not count water droplets that may be in the air such as
clouds or fog.
Sometimes intuition can be wrong, esp when body did not have a lot of
experience with a phenomena.
Say I hear it's very hard to tell distance on the water or height in the air
when paragliding.
I certainly can not tell apart 17g/m3 from say 4g/m3 with a naked eye.
--john
Troy the Troll - 26 Mar 2006 17:07 GMT
> While 0.8 inches of water is still very noticeable amount, it's very very
> different from the suggested 330 feet.
>
> HTH
> --john
Well, if you have been lurking for any length of time, you are familiar with
Filbert and his senility...and how it affects his ability to talk coherently
about....well...ANYTHING.