Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Sportbikes / August 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

On topic, non sportbike post...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TroytheTroll - 28 Aug 2006 01:44 GMT
Anyone ridden one of them DR-Z400S type Zooki's? Particularly on the
highway? It looks like an off road bike mostly, so I assume its a better
dirtroad bike than something like the KLR650, but how does it do for REAL
highway work? I assume it isn't as good as a KLR, but lets say I was in a
hotel, 10 miles from some cool dirt roads. Can it do 10 miles? 30 miles? 100
miles?

While I bet I could find a way to ride a KLR650 for 500 miles in a day, the
DRZ400 looks "dirty" enough to not be particularly pleasant over a long
highway haul.

Heres the theory, I had the Titan up four wheeling at about 10,000 altitude
last weekend, and ran into a group of trucks which had hauled pure dirtbikes
up into the boonies, and then they rode the dirtbikes further back in. On
two occasions, I jammed the Titan so far back on ATV trails that I had to
back out, 1/2 mile here or there, to get maneuvered around to drive back out
the regular way. So, I figure I get a streetable bike, keep some decent
knobbies on it, haul it back into to the middle of nowhere, then ride around
to places you can't get in the truck, load it back up, move to another
national forest, repeat as necessary until I have explored any and all jeep
trails in the area.

The KLR, when I did this type of stuff, was real tall, and way heavy up
high, but it would still sorta do it. In exchange for its limitations, you
could still ride it all day to the next jeep trail. While I would do that, I
don't need a real "street" dualsport because I've got the mighty mite, so I
can lean towards something more "dirty" this time around.
Peckhammer - 28 Aug 2006 03:40 GMT
> Anyone ridden one of them DR-Z400S type Zooki's? Particularly on the
> highway? It looks like an off road bike mostly, so I assume its a better
> dirtroad bike than something like the KLR650

I personally think it's a suck a.s dirt bike in that form.  Too heavy.
Not a bad desert ride, but not a woods-crusher by any means. OTOH, it's
streetable.  You should be able to manage 300 miles a day, no worries.

Hell, I just put 225 miles on Bannon's Husky yesterday.  The DR is like
a barcalounger in comparison. Make that 400 miles a day!

>--
Peckham

2003 GasGas TXT200 Pro
2002 GasGas TXT280
2001 GasGas TXT280
2000 Suzuki SV650
1983 Peugeot 103 SP
1981 Peugeot 103 SP
Inlaw Biker - 28 Aug 2006 03:49 GMT
> > Anyone ridden one of them DR-Z400S type Zooki's? Particularly on the
> > highway? It looks like an off road bike mostly, so I assume its a better
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Not a bad desert ride, but not a woods-crusher by any means. OTOH, it's
> streetable.  You should be able to manage 300 miles a day, no worries.

I see the DRZ 400's all the time in the woods. The riders complain
about them constantly but they're out there.  In the desert I think
they work better, as Peckham says.  They come street legal and work
pretty well on pavement.  They're cheap and reliable, heavy and
under-powered.  I see them all the time on the street too, those guys
seem to have no complaints.  For 99% street use I'd get a XR 650 L.

> Hell, I just put 225 miles on Bannon's Husky yesterday.  The DR is like
> a barcalounger in comparison. Make that 400 miles a day!
> Peckham

Bannon I'll trade you mile for mile, the Husky & the KTM.  I think
you'd like it.  Peckham you can ride the KTM all you like, I owe you
big time.

Greg Sumner
Seattle, WA
'98 XR 400 Dualsport
'06 KTM 200 XC-W
Daniel Bannon - 28 Aug 2006 05:13 GMT
>I see the DRZ 400's all the time in the woods. The riders complain
>about them constantly but they're out there.  In the desert I think
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>'98 XR 400 Dualsport
>'06 KTM 200 XC-W

"Cheap and reliable, heavy and underpowered."  Yet loveable by many,
we see.  Two guys in my riding posse have (or had) these: for what it
is, it seems to work OK.  Clif sold his, with an eye for something
more-raucous (TBD: KTM-Aprilia-Husqvarna, perhaps).

From every review I've read your bike is exceptional on the trail (OK,
I jest: one review, KTM 300 vs. the Gas Gas 300, not quite the same
but close).  I'd never talk smack about KTM, they were a finalist in
the Supermoto quest past few months.  Certainly great Seattle-local
dealer support, too.  

BUT: I like dirt bikes fine, but care not for dirt riding.  So there
we go: know thyself.  Might take you up on it, nonetheless, though
yours ain't street legal and mine probably isn't trail legal ;-)
Inlaw Biker - 28 Aug 2006 05:56 GMT
> "Cheap and reliable, heavy and underpowered."  Yet loveable by many,
> we see.  Two guys in my riding posse have (or had) these: for what it
> is, it seems to work OK.  Clif sold his, with an eye for something
> more-raucous (TBD: KTM-Aprilia-Husqvarna, perhaps).

As you recall I almost bought one.  Most people dig them for a while,
but sell them for something more focused.  They make neither excellent
trail bikes or street bikes, but get a solid grade in all areas.

> From every review I've read your bike is exceptional on the trail (OK,
> I jest: one review, KTM 300 vs. the Gas Gas 300, not quite the same
> but close).  I'd never talk smack about KTM, they were a finalist in
> the Supermoto quest past few months.  Certainly great Seattle-local
> dealer support, too.

The 300 and 200 are very different but both exceptional trail bikes.
The 200 is quicker and lighter but the most common complaint is the
motocross-like power hit.  The 300 has a lot more torque but not so
much quickness, and is heavier, and only comes in 5 speeds (the 200 has
6).  The 200 is built on the 125 frame, while the 250's and 300's have
a larger frame.   I could go on and on, but this is the sport bike
group right?  Gas Gas is generally considered the best dirt bike you
can get, but I think it's just splitting hairs at that point.  And at
my skill level it doesn't make much difference.

> BUT: I like dirt bikes fine, but care not for dirt riding.  So there
> we go: know thyself.  Might take you up on it, nonetheless, though
> yours ain't street legal and mine probably isn't trail legal ;-)

Mine isn't street legal but it has a license plate.  Which only serves
to scare away the forest rangers.  It's no fun on the street anyway.
Anyhow it's yours any time you wanna ride it.

Greg Sumner
Seattle, WA
'98 XR 400 Dualsport
'06 KTM 200 XC-W
Peckhammer - 28 Aug 2006 14:54 GMT
> The 200 is quicker and lighter but the most common complaint is the
> motocross-like power hit.

Easily solved.  You need an 8 to 12 oz. flywheel weight.  There are two
ways to do this.  The first is to send in yer flywheel in and have it
machined.  The second, and easier way, is to bolt on a flywheel weight.
There is a company in Oregon that makes an excellent one.  It
transformed my CR into a great woods machine.
Inlaw Biker - 29 Aug 2006 00:09 GMT
> > The 200 is quicker and lighter but the most common complaint is the
> > motocross-like power hit.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>  There is a company in Oregon that makes an excellent one.  It
> transformed my CR into a great woods machine.

That was the 1st thing I did, I added a 12oz weight.  Not so much for
the hit but so I'd quit stalling.  After riding the "unstallable" XR I
killed the KTM about 30 times on my first ride.  Gotta keep the revs up
on the 2-stroke.

Anyhow back to Troy's original question, for putting around the woods
off your pickup truck a DRZ400 would go anywhere you point it, no
problem.  For "serious all-dirt riding" most guys get a lighter bike,
but for what you want it's probably perfect.
TroytheTroll - 29 Aug 2006 00:14 GMT
> Anyhow back to Troy's original question, for putting around the woods
> off your pickup truck a DRZ400 would go anywhere you point it, no
> problem.  For "serious all-dirt riding" most guys get a lighter bike,
> but for what you want it's probably perfect.

Thats what I was wondering. Jeep trails aren't anywhere near "dirt riding",
I just want to zip on through a Jeep trail without an average speed of 2mph
like they do. Zip back on the bike, look around, zip back to the truck,
maybe down the road a little and try out another back road.
BryanUT - 29 Aug 2006 00:29 GMT
> Thats what I was wondering. Jeep trails aren't anywhere near "dirt
> riding", I just want to zip on through a Jeep trail without an average
> speed of 2mph like they do. Zip back on the bike, look around, zip back to
> the truck, maybe down the road a little and try out another back road.

Troy,

Seriously this is what you want:

http://www.yamaha-motor.com/sport/products/modelhome/10/0/home.aspx

I've ridden (mountain bike) and driven many of the trails in the Wasatch and
Unitas, I think this bike would be excellent.

On the other hand,  I really think you should get an old Trail 90.  There
are many in excellent condition for about $1500.

Bryan
TroytheTroll - 29 Aug 2006 01:29 GMT
> Troy,
>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Bryan

You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more interesting
than just a small trailie?
BryanUT - 29 Aug 2006 02:23 GMT
> You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more interesting
> than just a small trailie?

Not really.  I suggested the 200cc bike over the 90cc due to your
experience, age and perceived weight.

You suggested going faster than the jeeps, no problem on the trail 90 or
theYamaha.

Those trails in the Rockies can get nasty in second, a light bike with low
seat height is a confidence builder.  Falling off a taller bike on a narrow
or weird rutted trail is much more painful than stepping off an old school
trailie.

You may want to try the dirt newsgroups, you'll get a whole new perspective.

Bryan
Andrew - 29 Aug 2006 05:02 GMT
>> You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more interesting
>> than just a small trailie?
>
> Not really.  I suggested the 200cc bike over the 90cc due to your
> experience, age and perceived weight.

Perceived weight...hehehe
Troy and I have gravitational pull.

Signature

Andrew
00 Daytona
00 Speed Triple
71 Kawi H1
05 Toddler

TroytheTroll - 29 Aug 2006 05:04 GMT
>>> You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more interesting
>>> than just a small trailie?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Perceived weight...hehehe
> Troy and I have gravitational pull.

I like having gravitational pull.
BrianNZ - 29 Aug 2006 05:23 GMT
>>> You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more
>>> interesting than just a small trailie?
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Perceived weight...hehehe
> Troy and I have gravitational pull.

The polite phrase for that overhang is....'The verandah over the toy
shop'........
Inlaw Biker - 29 Aug 2006 17:14 GMT
> >>> You don't think I would find a REAL dual sport a little more
> >>> interesting than just a small trailie?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> The polite phrase for that overhang is....'The verandah over the toy
> shop'........

How bout  "a fuel tank for an ass-whoopin machine!"

Greg
Daniel Bannon - 29 Aug 2006 04:37 GMT
>> Anyhow back to Troy's original question, for putting around the woods
>> off your pickup truck a DRZ400 would go anywhere you point it, no
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>like they do. Zip back on the bike, look around, zip back to the truck,
>maybe down the road a little and try out another back road.

An Apriia RXV450 would make even shorter work of it.  A wild ride,
while it lasted!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.