Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Sportbikes / March 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Wouldn't something like this solve certain racing class issues?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
TroytheTroll - 25 Mar 2007 03:16 GMT
http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562

Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
without all the usual gyrations required to pretend to make things equal.
BryanUT - 25 Mar 2007 03:34 GMT
> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>
> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
> without all the usual gyrations required to pretend to make things equal.

Honestly Troy, when it comes to racing  the sanctioning bodies try to level
the playing field and give everyone a chance to win something.  Whether by
age, weight or other criteria....
Jamin - 25 Mar 2007 18:21 GMT
> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>
> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
> without all the usual gyrations required to pretend to make things equal.

Seems like a good idea, but once you add rider weight the ratios will end up
being different again. Lighter bikes' hp:wt ratios will be lower than
heavier bikes, when you factor in riders of the same weight. Maybe it
doesn't end up mattering that much, though.

Signature

Jamin
"I don't want a pickle..."

P.Roehling - 25 Mar 2007 21:28 GMT
>> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
>> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> heavier bikes, when you factor in riders of the same weight. Maybe it
> doesn't end up mattering that much, though.

It does if one rider weighs 120 and another weighs 220. But again, that's
going to be true in almost any sort of motorcycle racing. (Rossi isn't
exactly the Charles Atlas type.)
bsr3997@my-deja.com - 25 Mar 2007 23:28 GMT
> >> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
> >> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> going to be true in almost any sort of motorcycle racing. (Rossi isn't
> exactly the Charles Atlas type.)

In go-kart racing they use the combined weight of the driver and
kart.  Just a thought.

Bruce
TroytheTroll - 27 Mar 2007 02:50 GMT
>> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> up
> being different again.

Weigh the entire package.
Steve Mackay - 26 Mar 2007 10:15 GMT
> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>
> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
> without all the usual gyrations required to pretend to make things equal.

You mean like the current ASRA and CCS thunderbike classes? Which are
power to weight ratio classes, and as far as i can tell, the same thing
as the Canadian Thunder classes.
TroytheTroll - 27 Mar 2007 02:52 GMT
>> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> power to weight ratio classes, and as far as i can tell, the same thing as
> the Canadian Thunder classes.

I didn't notice any detuned 600cc sportbikes or R1's running against the
Buells, which under the Canadian rules is perfectly reasonable.

So you are saying they were there, and finished so poorly that they got
whupped by sv650's as well?
Steve Mackay - 27 Mar 2007 16:21 GMT
>>> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> So you are saying they were there, and finished so poorly that they got
> whupped by sv650's as well?

Yeah, and you wont see any 600 4 cyl bikes in the "Thunder twins class"
in Canada as well. Did you MISS the "twins" part?

It's going to be made up of BMWs, Buells, SVs, Ducatis, and the a
Bimota here and there.

*JUST* like the ASRA and CCS Thunderbike classes.
TroytheTroll - 28 Mar 2007 02:05 GMT
>> I didn't notice any detuned 600cc sportbikes or R1's running against the
>> Buells, which under the Canadian rules is perfectly reasonable.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Yeah, and you wont see any 600 4 cyl bikes in the "Thunder twins class" in
> Canada as well. Did you MISS the "twins" part?

Who cares? Make the power to weight ratio equal and I wouldn't care if you
ran 6 cylinders or 1. Pick your own poison.

> It's going to be made up of BMWs, Buells, SVs, Ducatis, and the a Bimota
> here and there.
>
> *JUST* like the ASRA and CCS Thunderbike classes.

So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to vtwins
only?
tomorrow@erols.com - 28 Mar 2007 02:30 GMT
> >> I didn't notice any detuned 600cc sportbikes or R1's running against the
> >> Buells, which under the Canadian rules is perfectly reasonable.
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to vtwins
> only?

I believe the thinking is that there are plenty of classes that the
600s and 1000cc fours already qualify for, and that there is a certain
segment of the viewing public who prefer to watch twins race, and
therefore those classes are limited to twins.  I guarantee you that if
the grids didn't fill and/or the spectators demanded otherwise, the
multis would assuredly be permitted to enter.
BrianNZ - 28 Mar 2007 02:41 GMT
>>>> I didn't notice any detuned 600cc sportbikes or R1's running against the
>>>> Buells, which under the Canadian rules is perfectly reasonable.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> the grids didn't fill and/or the spectators demanded otherwise, the
> multis would assuredly be permitted to enter.

Do you guys have BEAR's (British, European and American Racing) classes?

I really enjoy watching this class as it has all sorts in it, old and
new.....and the sound of twins racing beats the scream of high revving
multi's by far. And the people are borderline 1%'ers and associates who
know how to party afterwards.
tomorrow@erols.com - 28 Mar 2007 03:53 GMT
> tomor...@erols.com wrote:
> >>>> I didn't notice any detuned 600cc sportbikes or R1's running against the
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
>
> Do you guys have BEAR's (British, European and American Racing) classes?

We used to.  We don't any more.
TroytheTroll - 28 Mar 2007 03:37 GMT
>> So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to vtwins
>> only?
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> the grids didn't fill and/or the spectators demanded otherwise, the
> multis would assuredly be permitted to enter.

Well, I was approaching this from more of the "gee whats really fair" type
angle for everything. I didn't consider that twins guys want to really see
twins going at it without throwing other configurations into the mix,
because they might get confused, because they are fans of only their
favorite breed, etc etc.
tomorrow@erols.com - 28 Mar 2007 03:53 GMT
> >> So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to vtwins
> >> only?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Well, I was approaching this from more of the "gee whats really fair" type
> angle for everything.

Yeah, I understand that.

> I didn't consider that twins guys want to really see
> twins going at it without throwing other configurations into the mix,
> because they might get confused, because they are fans of only their
> favorite breed, etc etc.

Personally, I don't think it's that complicated.  I think fans of
twins racing like the SOUND of twins.

I don't give a sh.t if a 600cc Yamaha beats a 600cc Kawasaki, Honda,
and/or Suzuki.

I would love to see Ducati Superbikes mixing it up with RC51s and
TL1000Rs and Aprilia RSVs, etc.   Not because I don't like other
brands, but because hearing that race would be like a mechanical
symphony.
BrianNZ - 28 Mar 2007 03:57 GMT
>>>> So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to vtwins
>>>> only?
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> brands, but because hearing that race would be like a mechanical
> symphony.

....standing ovation....encore.....
Paul Elliot - 28 Mar 2007 18:25 GMT
>>>>> So whats wrong with opening up the idea to not just be limited to
>>>>> vtwins
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> ....standing ovation....encore.....

Ditto!

Signature

Heaven is where the police are British, the chefs Italian, the mechanics
German, the lovers French and it is all organized by the Swiss.

Hell is where the police are German,  the chefs British, the mechanics
French, the lovers Swiss and it is all organized by Italians.

http://new.photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart/albums/

Tweak - 28 Mar 2007 20:24 GMT
> >> I would love to see Ducati Superbikes mixing it up with RC51s and
> >> TL1000Rs and Aprilia RSVs, etc.   Not because I don't like other
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Ditto!

HWT, Thunderbike, etc. in any of a number of club racing orgs.  

Signature

Tweak

TroytheTroll - 28 Mar 2007 04:09 GMT
> I don't give a sh.t if a 600cc Yamaha beats a 600cc Kawasaki, Honda,
> and/or Suzuki.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> brands, but because hearing that race would be like a mechanical
> symphony.

Lets not forget that outstanding racing champion against sv650's, the
Buell!! Wouldn't be fair not to include them in a noise contest, now would
it?

How about this then, a singles class with 1 power/weight ratio number, a
twins class with another, a triples or I4's class for the upper echelon,
state of the art, top flight class? Or, if you prefer the twins, how about
THEY get top billing and the best power to weight number, and the triples
and I4's can be relegated to support class?

I really don't care, but it would be nice if the megabuck factories could
have their $$ power diminished somewhat, they'll still buy the best talent
no matter what, so they'll still win no matter what, but it would give up
and comers a chance to get noticed, if they could afford near parity on the
machine itself. Think...Barney back at Daytona a year or two ago.
Scott & the boys - 30 Mar 2007 23:07 GMT
How about just a diplacement limit, and the rest determined by power/weight
ratio. Something like motoGP, except that it would reflect the sales floor?

>> I don't give a sh.t if a 600cc Yamaha beats a 600cc Kawasaki, Honda,
>> and/or Suzuki.
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> and comers a chance to get noticed, if they could afford near parity on
> the machine itself. Think...Barney back at Daytona a year or two ago.
tomorrow@erols.com - 27 Mar 2007 02:56 GMT
> http://www.roadracingworld.com/news/article/?article=28562
>
> Seems reasonable to me anyway. Buells would be free to compete against
> Busa's and itsy bitsy bikes and Superbikes and 250 two strokes and such
> without all the usual gyrations required to pretend to make things equal.

And I could've raced my EX500 Superbike .... at 233 pounds!
H'mmmmm.....
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.