Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / General / Technical / January 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

How much tire weight is too much?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
B. Peg - 17 Jan 2008 22:28 GMT
Had to put nearly 3 ounces (85 grams) of weights on an Avon Storm tire to
get it to static balance.  Seemed like a lot of weight for a premium tire.
Anyone had similar experience?

Dealer said I shouldn't have to balance it since most motorcycle tires are
pretty much balanced from the manufacturer.   Not to doubt him, but that
seems a stretch.

B~
Rob Kleinschmidt - 17 Jan 2008 22:37 GMT
> Had to put nearly 3 ounces (85 grams) of weights on an Avon Storm tire to
> get it to static balance.  Seemed like a lot of weight for a premium tire.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> pretty much balanced from the manufacturer.   Not to doubt him, but that
> seems a stretch.

How well did the wheel balance by itself before the tire
was mounted ?
The Older Gentleman - 17 Jan 2008 22:52 GMT
> Dealer said I shouldn't have to balance it since most motorcycle tires are
> pretty much balanced from the manufacturer.  

Ri-ight.

Signature

K1100LT  750SS  CB400F  CD250  SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5  The bells, the bells.....
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com

Dr Ivan D. Reid - 17 Jan 2008 22:53 GMT
> Had to put nearly 3 ounces (85 grams) of weights on an Avon Storm tire to
> get it to static balance.  Seemed like a lot of weight for a premium tire.
> Anyone had similar experience?

> Dealer said I shouldn't have to balance it since most motorcycle tires are
> pretty much balanced from the manufacturer.   Not to doubt him, but that
> seems a stretch.

    Did you put the splice opposite the valve stem?  It's been a while
since I changed my own tyres, but ISTR that some manufacturers put the
paint dot at the splice and some put it opposite.  I ended up ignoring
that and physically locating the splice myself.  Maybe tyre technology has
changed a lot since, but if the tyre itself is perfectly balanced (e.g. no
splice) you still have to counter the valve stem.  The other problem is if
you don't get the tyre seated properly all the way around -- the
circumferential marking should be equidistant from the rim all the way
around on both sides.

Signature

Ivan Reid, School of Engineering & Design, _____________  CMS Collaboration,
Brunel University.    Ivan.Reid@[brunel.ac.uk|cern.ch]    Room 40-1-B12, CERN
GSX600F, RG250WD         "You Porsche. Me pass!"   DoD #484     JKLO#003, 005
WP7# 3000   LC Unit #2368 (tinlc)   UKMC#00009   BOTAFOT#16    UKRMMA#7 (Hon)
       KotPT -- "for stupidity above and beyond the call of duty".

George R. Young - 18 Jan 2008 01:46 GMT
> Had to put nearly 3 ounces (85 grams) of weights on an Avon Storm tire
> to get it to static balance.  Seemed like a lot of weight for a
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> B~

If I remember rightly, the Avons don't have a designated heavy spot. The
irony is if the tire doesn't have a heavy spot, you need more weight to
counter the valve.

For the record, was the added weight opposite the valve?
B. Peg - 18 Jan 2008 05:38 GMT
> "George R. Young" wrote:
> If I remember rightly, the Avons don't have a designated heavy spot. The
> irony is if the tire doesn't have a heavy spot, you need more weight to
> counter the valve.
> For the record, was the added weight opposite the valve?

George, you're right.  The weight is exactly 180 degrees from the valve.
The previous Avon on the bike had maybe  1-1/2 ounces, but it was maybe 110
degrees from the valve.  The Avons did not have any mark or dot for
positioning next to the valve stem.  They must overlap the rayon belt quite
a bit for 3 ounces.  I would have liked to try and rotate the tire but after
the bead seals, it becomes a major pita to fuss with breaking it down again
by hand.

Fwiw, I haven't seen any tire balance out enough for a dealer to say
"They're good enough as is and don't require balancing."  Probably just
don't want to balance them.  The Metzelers balanced out with far less weight
but the ride was much harsher due to the steel belt and tendency to scallop
around the tread patterns.

I'll try the pair of Maxon's buried in the garage after I shred the Avons in
about 3K miles.  My sportbike tires just don't last very long.

B~
The Older Gentleman - 18 Jan 2008 07:19 GMT
>  Probably just
> don't want to balance them.

Ding. Go to a proper tyre place.

Signature

K1100LT  750SS  CB400F  CD250  SL125
GAGARPHOF#30 GHPOTHUF#1 BOTAFOT#60 ANORAK#06 YTC#3
BOF#30 WUSS#5  The bells, the bells.....
chateau dot murray at idnet dot com

Jack Hunt - 18 Jan 2008 17:03 GMT
>The weight is exactly 180 degrees from the valve.

Break the bead on both sides and rotate the tire 180 degrees on the rim.

It probably won't render you "weightless" but it will probably help.

--
Jack
George Orwell - 29 Jan 2008 22:54 GMT
It doesn't make any difference how much weight is used so long as half is
on the left and half on the right side of the rim or else you will incur
dynamic imbalance.

Are you sure no liquid sealant has been introduced into the tube?  Any
liquid will seek the greatest radius and sit there, imblancing the
assembly.

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this
non corrisponde ad un utente   |message is not related to a real
reale ma all'indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an
di un sistema anonimizzatore   |anonymous system
Per maggiori informazioni      |For more info
                 https://www.mixmaster.it
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.