Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / August 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Another product recommendation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Dan White - 15 Aug 2007 12:04 GMT
Following a few suggestions from people here, I'd just like to say that
glassesdirect.co.uk rock a fat one.

Memoflex frames with anti reflective, scratch resistant and UV coating on
the lenses, £61. Delivered in 4 days. I is chuffed.

Signature

Dan White
(dan@finex666.org.uk)
Perform an exorcism when replying.

Bill - 15 Aug 2007 14:32 GMT
> Following a few suggestions from people here, I'd just like to say that
> glassesdirect.co.uk rock a fat one.
>
> Memoflex frames with anti reflective, scratch resistant and UV coating on
> the lenses, £61. Delivered in 4 days. I is chuffed.

Dan....
How do you get on about centreing the lenses to the pupil, like they do in
the opticians with a ruler across the forehead. Prescription is easy enough,
just get it from your optician, but it is the measuring that has put me off
buying online.

Bill
Dan White - 15 Aug 2007 14:47 GMT
<snip>

> Dan....
> How do you get on about centreing the lenses to the pupil, like they do in
> the opticians with a ruler across the forehead. Prescription is easy
> enough, just get it from your optician, but it is the measuring that has
> put me off buying online.

Read the PD figure from the prescription, that's the Pupillary Distance
figure that they need. Typically it's about 60mm in total, which I believe
is the distance from the centre of one pupil to the other.

Signature

Dan White
(dan@finex666.org.uk)
Perform an exorcism when replying.

Colin Irvine - 15 Aug 2007 15:55 GMT
><snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>figure that they need. Typically it's about 60mm in total, which I believe
>is the distance from the centre of one pupil to the other.

That still won't centre the lenses over the pupils, because your nose
may well not be half way between the two.

Signature

Colin Irvine
YZF1000R BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk

Dan White - 15 Aug 2007 16:34 GMT
<snip>

> That still won't centre the lenses over the pupils, because your nose
> may well not be half way between the two.

That's why I said "in total". It just happens that my PD reading was
30.0/30.0 too.

Signature

Dan White
(dan@finex666.org.uk)
Perform an exorcism when replying.

Colin Irvine - 15 Aug 2007 19:21 GMT
><snip>
>>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>That's why I said "in total". It just happens that my PD reading was
>30.0/30.0 too.

Er... so you're agreeing?

Signature

Colin Irvine
YZF1000R BOF#33 BONY#34 COFF#06 BHaLC#5
http://www.colinandpat.co.uk

Dan White - 15 Aug 2007 20:03 GMT
>><snip>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Er... so you're agreeing?

Yes, but I'll argue if you want ;-)

Signature

Dan White
(dan@finex666.org.uk)
Perform an exorcism when replying.

Champ - 15 Aug 2007 17:03 GMT
>><snip>
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>That still won't centre the lenses over the pupils, because your nose
>may well not be half way between the two.

Surely it'll be close enough unless you've got a face like a muppet.

Ah...
Signature

Champ
I don't know, but I been told, you never slow down, you never get old
ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R600 (race)
neal at champ dot org dot uk

Grimly Curmudgeon - 15 Aug 2007 19:00 GMT
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember "Bill" <co10@hotmail.co.uk> saying
something like:

>How do you get on about centreing the lenses to the pupil, like they do in
>the opticians with a ruler across the forehead. Prescription is easy enough,
>just get it from your optician, but it is the measuring that has put me off
>buying online.

Mirror, ruler - ruler, mirror. Easy.
Signature

Dave
GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

Teach a man to fish and he and his pikey mates will have the
river cleaned out in a day.

Ben - 15 Aug 2007 15:09 GMT
>Following a few suggestions from people here, I'd just like to say that
>glassesdirect.co.uk rock a fat one.
>
>Memoflex frames with anti reflective, scratch resistant and UV coating on
>the lenses, £61. Delivered in 4 days. I is chuffed.

Well, I'm going to chalk one up for the local optician[1].  Walked in
to a branch I don't normally use and told them I was after a
sunglasses version of the existing specs I have.  First off they
managed to source the frame, which they no longer.  Then they priced
them up with ultra-thin[2] Nikon Transitions lenses and they came out
at 400 quid.

They then reduced the price to just over 100 quid because I've been
with them so long (20 years) and I have a contact lense subscription
from them.  Delivery in a week.

[1] Dolland & Aitchison
[2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
in small frames.
Signature

ZX-10R

speedyspic@googlemail.com - 15 Aug 2007 16:04 GMT
> [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
> in small frames.

My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.

--
Lozzo
Ben - 15 Aug 2007 16:07 GMT
>> [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
>> in small frames.
>
>My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
>thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.

Mine wouldn't be far off that.  They're 2-3mm thick at the edges with
the thinnest lenses you can get.

-5.5 and -6.75.
Signature

ZX-10R

Phil Launchbury - 15 Aug 2007 16:25 GMT
>>My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
>>thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> -5.5 and -6.75.

Luxury. -9.5 and -11.5. Which is why I wear hard gas-perm contacts..

Phil.

Signature

            Phil Launchbury, IT PHB
   'I'm training the bats that live in my cube
             to juggle mushrooms'

Tosspot - 15 Aug 2007 19:22 GMT
>>>My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
>>>thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Luxury. -9.5 and -11.5. Which is why I wear hard gas-perm contacts..

f.ck me, you're more short sighted than me and I thought I was the UKRM bat!

Perhaps we should have BAT#s for those that aren't likely to see the
tree before they hit it.
Phil Launchbury - 16 Aug 2007 08:53 GMT
>> Luxury. -9.5 and -11.5. Which is why I wear hard gas-perm contacts..
>
> f.ck me, you're more short sighted than me and I thought I was the UKRM bat!
>
> Perhaps we should have BAT#s for those that aren't likely to see the
> tree before they hit it.

Cool. You can be KOTL and I can look myopically at the list..

I once moved the car without my lenses in (and without my glasses). Not
a pleasant experience.

It's hard to describe to people with good vision how terrifying it is
when *everything* is blurred (except stuff within about 4 inches of my
eyes - if I want to read anything I have to close my left eye and read
it with just my right eye because I have to hold it so close that
steoscopic vision doesn't work..). I can just about function without
glasses or lenses but only at a very basic level - I certainly can't do
any of the things I find enjoyable like reading, using computers,
driving etc etc..

But I do get help from the government towards the cost of my lenses (I
count as partially-sighted) to the princely total of GBP 1.95..

Phil.

Signature

            Phil Launchbury, IT PHB
   'I'm training the bats that live in my cube
             to juggle mushrooms'

Eiron - 16 Aug 2007 09:17 GMT
> It's hard to describe to people with good vision how terrifying it is
> when *everything* is blurred

You don't need to describe it. Just let them try on your glasses.
Actually if you are short-sighted that would make them long-sighted
and vice-versa but you see what I mean.

Signature

Eiron.

Des - 16 Aug 2007 09:20 GMT
>> It's hard to describe to people with good vision how terrifying it is
>> when *everything* is blurred
>
> You don't need to describe it. Just let them try on your glasses.

Or if you have an SLR camera to hand, let them look through the lens at an
object say ten feet away, and the turn the lens around a bit.  '_That's_
what I see when I take my glasses off!'.

D.

Signature

des | 'trop d'la balle, j'kiffe grave!'

ogden - 30 Aug 2007 22:49 GMT
> >> [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
> >> in small frames.
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Mine wouldn't be far off that.  They're 2-3mm thick at the edges with
> the thinnest lenses you can get.

If we're talking concave lenses for myopia, then the greater the
diameter, the thicker the lens will be at the edge. My regular specs are
rimless so don't use the thinnest lens available (too brittle) and my
Oakley sunnies are pretty much on the limit - any thicker and they'd be
unwearable.

Being blind blows goats at times, but I wouldn't dare risk unnecessary
eye surgery.

Signature

ogden
sv650 - surprisingly quick for a girl's bike

speedyspic@googlemail.com - 31 Aug 2007 00:32 GMT
> > >> [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
> > >> in small frames.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Oakley sunnies are pretty much on the limit - any thicker and they'd be
> unwearable.

I'm talking about having serious double vision[1] which requires a 15
prism shared between both lenses. At the moment I have a 3 prism in
each solid lens, with a 9 prism floppy fresnel lens stuck inside the
left lens of my specs. It's been like that for about 2 years while I
made sure that's what I needed - with a pair of lenses alone costing
around £270 I wasn't taking any chances on my prescription changing
soon. I'm also terrifically long sighted in my left eye but my right
is only slightly short-sighted.

> Being blind blows goats at times, but I wouldn't dare risk unnecessary
> eye surgery.

If my double vision had required anything above a 18 prism I would
have been up for surgery that involves adjustable sutures being fitted
at the edge of each eye. They tweak each suture up over time until the
eyes are pulled into the correct place to cure the double vision.

[1] Caused by a combination of smashing my head one too many times[2]
in bike and car accidents and having a TIA a couple of years ago. I
only needed a 6 prism until I had the mini-stroke.
[2] The final straw was smashing the old works van through the armco
on the A1 near Baldock, that time I lost 2 tyres and drove it into the
Little Chef car park. I hit my head against the B post and side window
quite hard in that accident.

--
Lozzo
wessie - 31 Aug 2007 02:00 GMT
>> If we're talking concave lenses for myopia, then the greater the
>> diameter, the thicker the lens will be at the edge. My regular specs
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> at the edge of each eye. They tweak each suture up over time until the
> eyes are pulled into the correct place to cure the double vision.

<scribbles notes>

<adds data to "works with troubled teenagers, must be f.cked in the
head" hypothesis>

Signature

wessie at tesco dot net

BMW R1150GS

"Wessie is a lovely man with many wonderful qualities" TM Blaney

platypus - 31 Aug 2007 09:26 GMT
>>> If we're talking concave lenses for myopia, then the greater the
>>> diameter, the thicker the lens will be at the edge. My regular specs
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> <adds data to "works with troubled teenagers, must be f.cked in the
> head" hypothesis>

<re-reads> f.cked in the eyes, surely?

Signature

platypus

somewhere to go for the night

ogden - 31 Aug 2007 07:31 GMT
> > > >My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
> > > >thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> I'm talking about having serious double vision[1] which requires a 15
> prism shared between both lenses.

Oh, I know you're a special case. I meant "we" as in "Ben and I".

Signature

ogden
sv650 - surprisingly quick for a girl's bike

speedyspic@googlemail.com - 31 Aug 2007 09:04 GMT
> speedys...@googlemail.com wrote:

> > I'm talking about having serious double vision[1] which requires a 15
> > prism shared between both lenses.
>
> Oh, I know you're a special case. I meant "we" as in "Ben and I".

<licks window>

--
Lozzo
Buzby - 15 Aug 2007 16:10 GMT
speedyspic@googlemail.com wibbled:

> > [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look
> > silly in small frames.
>
> My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
> thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.

Fark. They must weigh a ton - have you tried the ultra thin lenses? Not
cheap, but worth every penny IMO

Signature

Buzby
There's nothing more dangerous than a resourceful idiot

Wicked Uncle Nigel - 15 Aug 2007 20:32 GMT
Using the patented Mavis Beacon "Hunt&Peck" Technique,
speedyspic@googlemail.com typed

>> [2] Because bats have better sight than me and bottle tops look silly
>> in small frames.
>
>My new prescription will make my lenses somewhere between 8 and 10mm
>thick. Don't talk about bottle bottoms to me.

He wasn't. He was talking about bottle *tops*. Are you bli...

Oh! Wait...

Signature

Wicked Uncle Nigel - "He's hopeless, but he's honest"

WS* GHPOTHUF#24 APOSTLE#14 DLC#1 COFF#20 BOTAFOT#150 HYPO#0(KoTL) IbW#41
SBS#39 OMF#6 Enfield 500 Curry House Racer "The Basmati Rice Burner",
Honda GL1000K2 (Fallen apart) Kawasaki ZN1300 Voyager "Oh, Oh, It's so big"
Suzuki TS250 "The Africa Single" Honda ST1100 wiv trailer Norton 850 Commando
Kawasaki GTR1400

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.