Have we seen this before?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Fr Jack - 29 Apr 2008 20:30 GMT New type of engine valvgear...
http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html
And in a bike:
http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html
 Signature
Fr. Jack
The ex(un)civil servant
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 20:56 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html How's that work then? With a poppet valve a greater or lesser amount of fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but that rotary valve must contain a finite amount of mixture...
Perhaps I should read more of the website?
 Signature Si - XV535
Adrian - 29 Apr 2008 21:19 GMT "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" <eastREMOVEkent@gmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
> How's that work then? With a poppet valve a greater or lesser amount of > fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but that > rotary valve must contain a finite amount of mixture... Think about an electrical junction box, rotating the lid so two of the "ports" are open simultaneously... The head is the body of the JB, with one port into the chamber, the other to the manifold whilst the lid is the rotary valve.
Or something.
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 21:50 GMT > "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" <eastREMOVEkent@gmail.com> gurgled > happily, sounding much like they were saying: [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > Or something. Got it. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrr :)
 Signature Si - XV535
Simian - 29 Apr 2008 21:21 GMT > > New type of engine valvgear... > > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > of fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but > that rotary valve must contain a finite amount of mixture... I'm constantly surprised by peoples' inability to see the obvious.
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 21:50 GMT >>> New type of engine valvgear... >>> [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > I'm constantly surprised by peoples' inability to see the obvious. Fack orf, cahhhhhhhhnt.
 Signature Si - XV535
zymurgy@technologist.com - 29 Apr 2008 23:19 GMT On Apr 29, 9:50 pm, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" <eastREMOVEk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Fack orf, cahhhhhhhhnt. I'm glad reasoned discourse isn't dead on here ..
P.
Scraggy - 29 Apr 2008 21:01 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html Yes mate, here:-
http://www.peraves.ch/
 Signature I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members. Groucho Marx
Fr Jack - 29 Apr 2008 22:16 GMT >> New type of engine valvgear... >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >http://www.peraves.ch/ Err, no that's rather like a wankel engine; my link is a conventional piston engine, with the cams replaced bt the new fangled valves...
 Signature
Fr. Jack
The ex(un)civil servant
Scraggy - 30 Apr 2008 10:04 GMT >>> New type of engine valvgear... >>> [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > Err, no that's rather like a wankel engine; my link is a conventional > piston engine, with the cams replaced bt the new fangled valves... Is it too late to say no? I f.cking hate Shiraz me, it causes excess stupidity in silly old bastards.
 Signature I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as members. Groucho Marx
Simian - 29 Apr 2008 21:22 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > > http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off them.
Pip Luscher - 29 Apr 2008 22:01 GMT >> New type of engine valvgear... >> >> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html > >They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off >them. And refers to 'intake cycles' and the like.
 Signature -Pip
Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:20 GMT >> New type of engine valvgear... >> >> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html > > They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off > them. And they have ignotion too.
 Signature Beav
VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
Fr Jack - 30 Apr 2008 01:22 GMT >And they have ignotion too. That's when the ignition doesn't work...
 Signature
Fr. Jack
The ex(un)civil servant
Pip Luscher - 29 Apr 2008 22:20 GMT >New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html OK, this is what I spotted:
1) If the spherical valves don't need lubricants because of the 'special materials', then why can't these same materials be used on a conventional engine?
2) Claim: 'Poppet valves can't open before TDC'. Utter bollocks.
3) Claim: 'Poppet valve engines almost always exceed a temperature of 2,500 degrees F which in turn, at such high temperatures, produce oxides of nitrogen'. Well if he's referring to combustion temperature, true up to a point but high max. gas temperature == high thermodynamic efficiency. Besides which, what makes the balls engine '*combustion* temperatures lower?
4) Somehow the balls engine is multi fuel capable, yet conventional valved engines are not. To be fair, he does say it reduces hotspots and thus allows a higher CR or lower octane rating.
5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or exhaust gases out, then?
6) ...actually, I'm bored now. The sheer amount of bullshit puts me off bothering further.
 Signature -Pip
Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:21 GMT >>New type of engine valvgear... >> [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > efficiency. Besides which, what makes the balls engine '*combustion* > temperatures lower? Presumably because as the ball valve rotates, it's subjected to cooling air, probably from the nice cold air coming into the motor from the outside world. Perfect for those engines that run well on hot air as opposed to the engines we know that love cold air.
> 4) Somehow the balls engine is multi fuel capable, yet conventional > valved engines are not. To be fair, he does say it reduces hotspots > and thus allows a higher CR or lower octane rating. He could be thinking about engines from the 80's that needed lead in the fuel. He obviously doesn't know about lead free stuff, or it can't be bought in leftpondia.
> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and > pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates > engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or > exhaust gases out, then? Does ANY engine pump mixture in (apart from a turbo or supercharged engine?) Fuel is pumped, but the air it mixes with isn't. Not that it makes any diff, because the valves themselves don't affect how the air/mixture reaches them.
> 6) ...actually, I'm bored now. The sheer amount of bullshit puts me > off bothering further. Have you watched and listened) to the video. It's lauhable what sound it makes.
 Signature Beav
VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
Pip Luscher - 30 Apr 2008 19:15 GMT >> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and >> pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates >> engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or >> exhaust gases out, then? > >Does ANY engine pump mixture in (apart from a turbo or supercharged engine?) Well, yes; the whole engine is a pump. It has to draw mixture (or air if DI) in through an intake system.
I'm not saying that the ball valves in themselves would necessarily be a bad idea, but the exaggerated claims and bullshit kind of swamp any useful information he presents.
 Signature -Pip
Beav - 30 Apr 2008 20:09 GMT >>> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and >>> pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Well, yes; the whole engine is a pump. It has to draw mixture (or air > if DI) in through an intake system.
> I'm not saying that the ball valves in themselves would necessarily be > a bad idea, but the exaggerated claims and bullshit kind of swamp any > useful information he presents. What these guys do is sit down and draw up a list of "features and benfits". Once they run out of REAL features and TRUE benefits, they're so giddy, they can't f.cking stop yakking and writing.
We see the reuslts in these wild-as-f.ck claims.
 Signature Beav
VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
Greybeard - 29 Apr 2008 22:24 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html The bikes look remarkably like a Harley Softail and the engine crankcase and primary I would say without doubt are from HD! Interesting technology though. Will it catch on?
 Signature Greybeard
FLHR -03 UK (95 cu-in Stg 2. Big Boy2!) Trumpet Trophy 1200-03 Garmin Zumo 550, To get me home!
ukrm@foxtails[dot]co[dot]uk
Ace - 29 Apr 2008 22:57 GMT >> New type of engine valvgear... >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >primary I would say without doubt are from HD! >Interesting technology though. I was pleased to read Pip L's comments, as I'd thought of several of them myself, but wasn't sure, not being an engineer, like.
>Will it catch on? Naah. Direct injection's the way forward. Covers many of the claims this one makes, but at a much more detailed level, IYSWIM. Oh, and it's already out there working on hundreds[1] of thousands of cars.
[1] Tens, perhaps. Been in use by Mitsubushi and VW that I knowof for a few years now, anyway.
 Signature _______ .'_/_|_\_'. Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com) \`\ | /`/ `\\ | //' BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10 `\|/` `
Pip Luscher - 30 Apr 2008 19:16 GMT >I was pleased to read Pip L's comments, as I'd thought of several of >them myself, but wasn't sure, not being an engineer, like. Ah, well I was pleased that you'd thought of them too, not being an engineer myself, like!
 Signature -Pip
Dentist - 30 Apr 2008 00:09 GMT Fr Jack <sp@m.com> wrote;
>New type of engine valvgear... It's a Cross rotary, but one for each port. A double-Cross?
 Signature Denis SprintST1050 Tiger750TR7RV
Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:19 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > > http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html Interesting arrangement and if it's as good as they make out, it'll probably be more common than the Wankel engine. Changing people's minds about the conventional valve engine isn't going to be easy though.
> And in a bike: > > http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html When you say "bike", I assume you're taking the piss.
It sounds like a bunch of aliens being squeezed between two dump trucks too. Must be a shite sound recording.
 Signature Beav
VN 750 Zed 1000 OMF# 19
platypus - 30 Apr 2008 01:26 GMT > New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html Not dissimilar to a sleeve valve.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeve_valve
Hog - 30 Apr 2008 12:41 GMT >> New type of engine valvgear... >> [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeve_valve I did some reasonably advanced designs for a rotary valve engine while at the AEA. Limitations (at the time) were finance to produce and the sealing materials. I'd rather see an advanced 2-T design come along TBH and I love the new Mazda rotary as per the RX-8.
 Signature Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400
Grimly Curmudgeon - 30 Apr 2008 14:21 GMT We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying something like:
>New type of engine valvgear... > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > >http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html They make all sorts of dubious claims, imo.
"The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates engine friction and pumping losses." This is a pile of donkey dung.
Many other words and phrases are in the text that makes me wonder just who wrote it.
 Signature Dave GS850x2 XS650 SE6a
"It's a moron working with power tools. How much more suspenseful can you get?" - House
Champ - 30 Apr 2008 14:37 GMT >We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the >drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying something [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] >"The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates engine >friction and pumping losses." This is a pile of donkey dung. Christ, isn't it. How can different valvegear affect pumping losses from the pistons going up and down?
 Signature Champ
ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle To email me, neal at my domain should work.
Hog - 30 Apr 2008 14:51 GMT >> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the >> drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > Christ, isn't it. How can different valvegear affect pumping losses > from the pistons going up and down? I expect they mean within the cylinder head. Don't F1 engines run crankcases at very low air pressure for such reasons?
Anyway, a nice desmo does the job.
 Signature Hog '03 ST4S '96 Bastard12 '89 R100RS '81 XS650 '78 RD400
|
|
|