Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
MotorcyclesHarleyYamahaSportbikesRacingOff-roadSnowmobilesTechnical
Country Specific
Australian GroupUK GroupClassic (UK Group)
Related Topics
CarsBoatsMore Topics ...

Motorcycle Forum / Country Specific / UK Group / April 2008



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Have we seen this before?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Fr Jack - 29 Apr 2008 20:30 GMT
New type of engine valvgear...

http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html

And in a bike:

http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html
Signature


Fr. Jack

The ex(un)civil servant

Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 20:56 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

How's that work then? With a poppet valve a greater or lesser amount of
fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but that rotary
valve must contain a finite amount of mixture...

Perhaps I should read more of the website?

Signature

Si - XV535

Adrian - 29 Apr 2008 21:19 GMT
"Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" <eastREMOVEkent@gmail.com> gurgled happily,
sounding much like they were saying:

> How's that work then? With a poppet valve a greater or lesser amount of
> fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but that
> rotary valve must contain a finite amount of mixture...

Think about an electrical junction box, rotating the lid so two of the
"ports" are open simultaneously... The head is the body of the JB, with
one port into the chamber, the other to the manifold whilst the lid is
the rotary valve.

Or something.
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 21:50 GMT
> "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot" <eastREMOVEkent@gmail.com> gurgled
> happily, sounding much like they were saying:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Or something.

Got it. Derrrrrrrrrrrrrr :)

Signature

Si - XV535

Simian - 29 Apr 2008 21:21 GMT
> > New type of engine valvgear...
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> of fuel/air mixture can be pushed past the valve as and when, but
> that rotary valve must contain a finite amount of mixture...

I'm constantly surprised by peoples' inability to see the obvious.
Mungo "Two Sheds" Toadfoot - 29 Apr 2008 21:50 GMT
>>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> I'm constantly surprised by peoples' inability to see the obvious.

Fack orf, cahhhhhhhhnt.

Signature

Si - XV535

zymurgy@technologist.com - 29 Apr 2008 23:19 GMT
On Apr 29, 9:50 pm, "Mungo \"Two Sheds\" Toadfoot"
<eastREMOVEk...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >>> New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> Fack orf, cahhhhhhhhnt.

I'm glad reasoned discourse isn't dead on here ..

P.
Scraggy - 29 Apr 2008 21:01 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

Yes mate, here:-

http://www.peraves.ch/

Signature

I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as
members. Groucho Marx

Fr Jack - 29 Apr 2008 22:16 GMT
>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>http://www.peraves.ch/

Err, no that's rather like a wankel engine; my link is a conventional
piston engine, with the cams replaced bt the new fangled valves...
Signature


Fr. Jack

The ex(un)civil servant

Scraggy - 30 Apr 2008 10:04 GMT
>>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> Err, no that's rather like a wankel engine; my link is a conventional
> piston engine, with the cams replaced bt the new fangled valves...

Is it too late to say no?
I f.cking hate Shiraz me, it causes excess stupidity in silly old bastards.

Signature

I don't care to belong to a club that accepts people like me as
members. Groucho Marx

Simian - 29 Apr 2008 21:22 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html

They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off
them.
Pip Luscher - 29 Apr 2008 22:01 GMT
>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>
>> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html
>
>They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off
>them.

And refers to 'intake cycles' and the like.

Signature

-Pip

Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:20 GMT
>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>
>> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html
>
> They've pluralised 'RPM', ffs, I wouldn't buy an adjustable spanner off
> them.

And they have ignotion too.

Signature

Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19

Fr Jack - 30 Apr 2008 01:22 GMT
>And they have ignotion too.

That's when the ignition doesn't work...
Signature


Fr. Jack

The ex(un)civil servant

Pip Luscher - 29 Apr 2008 22:20 GMT
>New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

OK, this is what I spotted:

1) If the spherical valves don't need lubricants because of the
'special materials', then why can't these same materials be used on a
conventional engine?

2) Claim: 'Poppet valves can't open before TDC'. Utter bollocks.

3) Claim: 'Poppet valve engines almost always exceed a temperature of
2,500 degrees F which in turn, at such high temperatures, produce
oxides of nitrogen'. Well if he's referring to combustion temperature,
true up to a point but high max. gas temperature == high thermodynamic
efficiency. Besides which, what makes the balls engine '*combustion*
temperatures lower?

4) Somehow the balls engine is multi fuel capable, yet conventional
valved engines are not. To be fair, he does say it reduces hotspots
and thus allows a higher CR or lower octane rating.

5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and
pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates
engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or
exhaust gases out, then?

6) ...actually, I'm bored now. The sheer amount of bullshit puts me
off bothering further.

Signature

-Pip

Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:21 GMT
>>New type of engine valvgear...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> efficiency. Besides which, what makes the balls engine '*combustion*
> temperatures lower?

Presumably because as the ball valve rotates, it's subjected to cooling air,
probably from the nice cold air coming into the motor from the outside
world. Perfect for those engines that run well on hot air as opposed to the
engines we know that love cold air.

> 4) Somehow the balls engine is multi fuel capable, yet conventional
> valved engines are not. To be fair, he does say it reduces hotspots
> and thus allows a higher CR or lower octane rating.

He could be thinking about engines from the 80's that needed lead in the
fuel. He obviously doesn't know about lead free stuff, or it can't be bought
in leftpondia.

> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and
> pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates
> engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or
> exhaust gases out, then?

Does ANY engine pump mixture in (apart from a turbo or supercharged engine?)
Fuel is pumped, but the air it mixes with isn't. Not that it makes any diff,
because the valves themselves don't affect how the air/mixture reaches them.

> 6) ...actually, I'm bored now. The sheer amount of bullshit puts me
> off bothering further.

Have you watched and listened) to the video. It's lauhable what sound it
makes.

Signature

Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19

Pip Luscher - 30 Apr 2008 19:15 GMT
>> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and
>> pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates
>> engine friction and pumping losses'. So it doesn't pump mixture in or
>> exhaust gases out, then?
>
>Does ANY engine pump mixture in (apart from a turbo or supercharged engine?)

Well, yes; the whole engine is a pump. It has to draw mixture (or air
if DI) in through an intake system.

I'm not saying that the ball valves in themselves would necessarily be
a bad idea, but the exaggerated claims and bullshit kind of swamp any
useful information he presents.

Signature

-Pip

Beav - 30 Apr 2008 20:09 GMT
>>> 5) Claim: 'Conventional engines lose power through friction and
>>> pumping. The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> Well, yes; the whole engine is a pump. It has to draw mixture (or air
> if DI) in through an intake system.

> I'm not saying that the ball valves in themselves would necessarily be
> a bad idea, but the exaggerated claims and bullshit kind of swamp any
> useful information he presents.

What these guys do is sit down and draw up a list of "features and benfits".
Once they run out of REAL features and TRUE benefits, they're so giddy, they
can't f.cking stop yakking and writing.

We see the reuslts in these wild-as-f.ck claims.

Signature

Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19

Greybeard - 29 Apr 2008 22:24 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

The bikes look remarkably like a Harley Softail and the engine crankcase and
primary I would say without doubt are from HD!
Interesting technology though.
Will it catch on?
Signature

Greybeard

FLHR -03 UK (95 cu-in Stg 2. Big Boy2!)
Trumpet Trophy 1200-03
Garmin Zumo 550, To get me home!

ukrm@foxtails[dot]co[dot]uk

Ace - 29 Apr 2008 22:57 GMT
>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>primary I would say without doubt are from HD!
>Interesting technology though.

I was pleased to read Pip L's comments, as I'd thought of several of
them myself, but wasn't sure, not being an engineer, like.

>Will it catch on?

Naah. Direct injection's the way forward. Covers many of the claims
this one makes, but at a much more detailed level, IYSWIM. Oh, and
it's already out there working on hundreds[1] of thousands of cars.

[1] Tens, perhaps. Been in use by Mitsubushi and VW that I knowof for
a few years now, anyway.
Signature

 _______
.'_/_|_\_'.  Ace (b.rogers at ifrance.com)
\`\  |  /`/  
`\\ | //'   BOTAFOT#3, SbS#2, UKRMMA#13, DFV#8, SKA#2, IBB#10
  `\|/`
    `

Pip Luscher - 30 Apr 2008 19:16 GMT
>I was pleased to read Pip L's comments, as I'd thought of several of
>them myself, but wasn't sure, not being an engineer, like.

Ah, well I was pleased that you'd thought of them too, not being an
engineer myself, like!

Signature

-Pip

Dentist - 30 Apr 2008 00:09 GMT
Fr Jack <sp@m.com> wrote;
>New type of engine valvgear...

It's a Cross rotary, but one for each port.
A double-Cross?
Signature

Denis
SprintST1050 Tiger750TR7RV

Beav - 30 Apr 2008 01:19 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/technology.html

Interesting arrangement and if it's as good as they make out, it'll probably
be more common than the Wankel engine. Changing people's minds about the
conventional valve engine isn't going to be easy though.

> And in a bike:
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

When you say "bike", I assume you're taking the piss.

It sounds like a bunch of aliens being squeezed between two dump trucks too.
Must be a shite sound recording.

Signature

Beav

VN 750
Zed 1000
OMF# 19

platypus - 30 Apr 2008 01:26 GMT
> New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

Not dissimilar to a sleeve valve.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeve_valve
Hog - 30 Apr 2008 12:41 GMT
>> New type of engine valvgear...
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleeve_valve

I did some reasonably advanced designs for a rotary valve engine while at
the AEA. Limitations (at the time) were finance to produce and the sealing
materials.
I'd rather see an advanced 2-T design come along TBH and I love the new
Mazda rotary as per the RX-8.

Signature

Hog
'03 ST4S  '96 Bastard12  '89 R100RS  '81 XS650  '78 RD400

Grimly Curmudgeon - 30 Apr 2008 14:21 GMT
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying something
like:

>New type of engine valvgear...
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>http://www.coatesengine.com/motorcycle.html

They make all sorts of dubious claims, imo.

"The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates engine
friction and pumping losses." This is a pile of donkey dung.

Many other words and phrases are in the text that makes me wonder just
who wrote it.

Signature

Dave
GS850x2 XS650 SE6a

"It's a moron working with power tools.
How much more suspenseful can you get?"
- House

Champ - 30 Apr 2008 14:37 GMT
>We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying something
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>"The spherical rotary valve assembly virtually eliminates engine
>friction and pumping losses." This is a pile of donkey dung.

Christ, isn't it.  How can different valvegear affect pumping losses
from the pistons going up and down?
Signature

Champ

ZX10R | GPz750turbo | GSX-R 600 racer
My advice as your attorney is to buy a motorcycle
To email me, neal at my domain should work.

Hog - 30 Apr 2008 14:51 GMT
>> We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
>> drugs began to take hold. I remember Fr Jack <sp@m.com> saying
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
> Christ, isn't it.  How can different valvegear affect pumping losses
> from the pistons going up and down?

I expect they mean within the cylinder head.
Don't F1 engines run crankcases at very low air pressure for such reasons?

Anyway, a nice desmo does the job.

Signature

Hog
'03 ST4S  '96 Bastard12  '89 R100RS  '81 XS650  '78 RD400

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.